A Cambridge City Council website
A Cambridge City Council website
Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Agenda and minutes
Venue: Committee Room 1 & 2, The Guildhall, Market Square, Cambridge, CB2 3QJ. View directions
Contact: Toni Birkin Committee Manager
| No. | Item | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Apologies To
receive any apologies for absence. Minutes: Apologies were received from Councillor Bird. Councillor Gawthrope was present as the alternate. |
||||||||||
|
Declarations of Interest Members are asked to declare at this stage any interests
that they may have in an item shown on this agenda. If any member of the
Committee is unsure whether or not they should declare an
interest on a particular matter, they should seek advice from the Head of Legal
Services before the meeting. Minutes:
|
||||||||||
|
To approve the minutes of the previous meeting. Minutes: The minutes for the meeting of the 24th September 2015 were approved and signed as a correct record. |
||||||||||
|
Public Questions Please see information at the end of the agenda. Minutes: There were no public questions. |
||||||||||
|
Housing Revenue Account Budget Setting Report Additional documents:
Minutes: This item was chaired by Diana Minns (Vice Chair
/Tenant Representative) Matter for
Decision The report
referred to the 2016/17
budget process. The range of assumptions upon which the Housing Revenue Account
(HRA) Business Plan and Mid-Year Financial Review were based, were reviewed in
light of the latest information available, culminating in the preparation of
the HRA Budget Setting Report. Decision of
Executive Councillor for Housing The Executive Councillor for Housing resolved to: a)
Approve that council dwellings rents for existing
tenants be reduced by 1%, in line with legislative requirements, introduced as
part of the Welfare Reform and Work Bill 2015, with effect from 4th April 2016.
This equates to an average rent reduction at the time of writing this report of
£1.01 per week on a 52 week basis. b)
Approve inflationary increases of 2% in garage and
parking space rents for 2016/17, in line with the base rate of inflation for
the year assumed in the HRA Budget Setting Report. c)
Approve the proposed service charges for Housing
Revenue Account services and facilities, as shown in Appendix B of the HRA
Budget Setting Report. d)
Approve the proposed leasehold administration
charges for 2016/17 as detailed in Appendix B of the HRA Budget Setting Report.
e)
Approve that service charges for gas maintenance,
door entry systems, lifts and electrical and mechanical maintenance are
increased by a maximum of inflation as measured by CPI at September 2015
(-0.1%) plus 1%, if required, to continue to recover full estimated costs as
detailed in Appendix B of the HRA Budget Setting Report. This will result in a
cap in increases for these charges of 0.9%. f)
Approve that caretaking, building cleaning, estate
services, grounds maintenance, temporary housing premises and utilities,
sheltered scheme premises and utilities, digital television aerial, flat
cleaning and catering charges continue to be recovered at full cost, as
detailed in Appendix B of the HRA Budget Setting Report. g)
Approve that the charge for the full cost of the
provision of the alarm service in sheltered housing and dispersed community
alarm properties be identified separately, as a charge which is ineligible for
housing benefit, following cessation of funding for this service by the County
Council from April 2016. Revenue – HRA Revised Budget 2015/16: h)
Approve with any amendments, the Revised Budget
identified in Section 4 of the HRA Budget Setting Report, which reflects a net
reduction in the use of HRA reserves for 2015/16 of £19,300. i)
Approve release, cessation of use, and
appropriation, of an ear-marked reserve currently standing at £121,900, held in
respect of monies received for the placement of aerials on HRA flat blocks,
into general HRA reserves, to allow alternative future use. Budget 2016/17: j)
Approve with any amendments, the Non-Cash Limit
items shown in Appendix D (1) of the HRA Budget
Setting Report. k)
Approve with any amendments, the Unavoidable
Revenue Pressures, Savings and Increased Income proposals, shown in Appendix D
(1) of the HRA Budget Setting Report. l)
Approve the deletion of the Priority Policy Fund
(PPF) allocation of £150,000 from 2017/18, and instead approve the creation of
a fund for Service Development and Transformation/ Invest to Save Initiatives,
of £120,000 per annum for 5 years from 2016/17. Approve delegated authority to
the Strategic Advisor, to invest this fund, in either one-off projects, or to
fund ongoing activity as required. m)
Approve the resulting Housing Revenue Account revenue
budget as summarised in the Housing Revenue Account Summary Forecast 2015/16 to
2020/21 shown in Appendix J of the HRA Budget Setting Report. Treasury
Management n)
Request that, in 2016/17, officers review the
existing approach to treasury management, which required 25% of the value of
the housing debt to be set-aside by the point at which the loan portfolio
matures, recognising the financial constraints that have been placed upon the
HRA as a result of recent change in national housing policy. A separate report
will be brought back to Housing Scrutiny Committee in 2016/17 following this
review. Housing Capital o)
Approval of capital bids, shown in Appendix D (2)
of the HRA Budget Setting Report, to include meeting the capital cost of
re-locating staff to a single area housing office, with the cost to be funded
from existing repairs and renewals funds for the service. p)
Approval of amendment to the Decent Homes Programme
investment, recognising the ability to make savings of £810,000 in 2015/16 in
respect of boiler replacements, roof structure works, communal areas
investment, garage refurbishment, asbestos removal and fire safety works, as
detailed in Section 5 and Appendix E (2) of the HRA Budget Setting Report. q)
Approval of the need to re-profile resource of
£570,000 from 2015/16 into 2016/17 in respect of roof covering works and
bathroom replacements, and £102,000 from 2015/16 into later years of the
programme in respect of remedial works due to sulphate, as detailed in Section
5 and Appendix E (2) of the HRA Budget Setting Report. r)
Approval of the latest budget, spend profile and
funding mix for each of the schemes in the new build programme, as detailed in
Section 5 and Appendix H of the HRA Budget Setting Report, recognising the most
up to date information available as each scheme progresses through the design, planning,
build contract and completion process. s)
Recognition of the need to incorporate into the
Housing Capital Investment Plan, grants awarded by the Homes and Communities
Agency in respect of Aylesborough Close, Water Lane, Ditchburn Place and Clay Farm. t)
Approval to earmark the required level of
additional funding for new build investment between 2016/17 and 2017/18 to
ensure that commitments can be met in respect of the investment of all right to
buy receipts retained by the authority, up to the end of September 2015. u)
Approval to earmark additional resource of
£3,110,000 towards the cost of the re-development of Anstey Way, in
anticipation of a revised scheme being brought forward for the site,
recognising the lower level of HRA resource available than anticipated when the
scheme was first considered. v)
Approval of allocation of funds for a scheme to
re-develop a mixed use HRA site in Akeman Street,
subject to the approval of a separate report for the scheme, to be considered
in Part 2 of this committee agenda. w)
Approval of the revised Housing Capital Investment
Plan as shown in Appendix K of the HRA Budget Setting Report. x)
Approve a provisional addition to the Housing
Capital Allowance of £34,303,000 in respect of anticipated qualifying
expenditure in 2016/17. General y)
Approval of delegation to the Head of Finance, as
Section 151 Officer, to make the necessary detailed budgetary adjustments in
the HRA, in respect of savings approved as part of the HRA Mid-Year Financial
Review, following the outcome of consultation with both tenants and staff about
proposed service changes and resulting final savings. Reason for the Decision As set out in the Officer’s report. Any Alternative Options Considered and Rejected Not applicable. Scrutiny
Considerations The Committee
received a report from the Principal Accountant / Business Manager on the HRA
Budget-Setting Report. It set out the key parameters for the detailed recommendations
and final budget proposals, and is the basis for the finalisation of the
2016/17 budgets. Due to the Liberal Democratic proposed amendment to the budget the
Principal Accountant / Business Manager advised the order of the vote would be
reversed with part two of the recommendations (O to Y) being taken first, in
order for the Councillors to vote on the capital before the Committee voted on
the first half of the recommendation (A to N). The Committee made the following comments in response to the report:
i.
Sought clarification regarding the following
issues: Star Surveys; progress with shared Housing Management Service;
recharges for building cleaning costs; HRA receipts for aerials; and why an
office move for the area housing offices produced a need for new furniture.
ii.
Suggested that both Area Housing Manager posts be
retained while major changes were delivered.
iii.
Requested updates on any representations to Central
Government regarding the rent reductions.
iv.
Expressed regret that extending the life of older
boilers would have an impact on climate change reduction targets and on costs
to tenants.
v.
Suggested that a reduced
provision of emergency alarms would increase cost to other services such as the
NHS. In response to Members’ questions the Director of Customer and Community
Services and Business Manager / Principal Accountant stated that:
i.
The Star Survey would be reviewed at the March
meeting. The need to manage expectations in line with the need to meet savings
targets.
ii.
Sharing services with South Cambs
would provide savings in future. Work was ongoing to examine potential new ways
of working and to identify potential savings.
iii.
Negotiations were on-going regarding the building
cleaning contract. However, a refund for past poor performance had been secured. iv.
Aerial revenues funds were used to fund the
following: CCTV and the laundry room at Kingsway flats and a laundry room and
community room at Princess and Hanover Courts. Any remaining revenue would be
added to the HRA budget.
v.
The existing furniture of the area housing offices
would be reused where possible following any move. However, some smaller
furniture might be required to maximise usable office space in the new
location. vi.
Local Authorities were holding meetings to discuss
the potential impact of the Housing Bill. However, until the Bill became law,
no legal challenge was possible. Submissions would be made to the Housing
Commission. vii.
A future report of provisions to sustain tenants
and to assist them to manage their budget and to maintain their rent payments
following changes to welfare provision and the loss of Area Housing Offices,
would come to this committee later in the year. viii.
Tenants would be informed of alternative provision
for the payment of rent and access points for housing advice. Councillor Price stated that he had met with
the Housing Minister and had written to him regarding the rent reductions and
the requirement to sell high value properties. The Business Manager / Principal Accountant
stated that there were no proposals to remove the alarms from sheltered Housing
schemes. However, the County Council subsidy for this service was being
withdrawn. The Head of City Homes stated that his team were aware of how
important this service was and that the current provision went above and beyond
what many providers offered. He invited Members to contact him if they would
like to visit to the Care Call service. The Committee discussed the level of council
garage voids and potential solution. It was suggested that many were too small
for modern cars and that rent levels for alternative uses, such as storage,
were prohibitively expensive compared to other storage options. Councillor Avery
proposed the Liberal Democrats Group alternative budget and outlined the
proposals for the Committee’s consideration. He thanked officers for their time
and assistance over the Christmas period.
2.
Recommendations Changes to
recommendations in the original report are highlighted in Bold Italics. All of the
recommendations have been re-stated in full for clarity. Under Part 1 of
the agenda, the Executive Councillor, is recommended, following scrutiny and
debate at Housing Scrutiny Committee, to: Review of Rents and Charges a)
Approve that council dwellings rents
for existing tenants be reduced by 1%, in line with legislative requirements,
introduced as part of the Welfare Reform and Work Bill 2015, with effect from
4th April 2016. This equates to an average rent reduction at the time of
writing this report of £1.01 per week on a 52 week basis. b)
Approve inflationary increases of 2% in
garage and parking space rents for 2016/17, in line with the base rate of
inflation for the year assumed in the HRA Budget Setting Report. c)
Approve the proposed service charges
for Housing Revenue Account services and facilities, as shown in Appendix B of
the HRA Budget Setting Report. d)
Approve the proposed leasehold
administration charges for 2016/17 as detailed in Appendix B of the HRA Budget
Setting Report. e)
Approve that service charges for gas
maintenance, door entry systems, lifts and electrical and mechanical
maintenance are increased by a maximum of inflation as measured by CPI at
September 2015 (-0.1%) plus 1%, if required, to continue to recover full
estimated costs as detailed in Appendix B of the HRA Budget Setting Report.
This will result in a cap in increases for these charges of 0.9%. f)
Approve that caretaking, building
cleaning, estate services, grounds maintenance, temporary housing premises and
utilities, sheltered scheme premises and utilities, digital television aerial,
flat cleaning and catering charges continue to be recovered at full cost, as
detailed in Appendix B of the HRA Budget Setting Report. g)
Approve that the charge for the full
cost of the provision of the alarm service in sheltered housing and dispersed
community alarm properties be identified separately, as a charge which is
ineligible for housing benefit, following cessation of funding for this service
by the County Council from April 2016. Revenue – HRA Revised Budget 2015/16: h)
Approve with any amendments, the
Revised Budget identified in Section 4 of the HRA Budget Setting Report, which
reflects a net reduction in the use of HRA reserves for 2015/16 of £19,300. i)
Approve release, cessation of use, and
appropriation, of an ear-marked reserve currently standing at £121,900, held in
respect of monies received for the placement of aerials on HRA flat blocks,
into general HRA reserves, to allow alternative future use. Budget 2016/17: j)
Approve with any amendments, the
Non-Cash Limit items shown in Appendix D (1) of the HRA Budget Setting Report,
as amended in line with Appendix D (1) to this report. k)
Approve with any amendments, the
Unavoidable Revenue Pressures, Savings and Increased Income proposals, shown in
Appendix D (1) of the HRA Budget Setting Report, as amended in line with
Appendix D (1) to this report. l)
Approve the deletion of the Priority
Policy Fund (PPF) allocation of £150,000 from 2017/18, and instead approve the creation
of a fund for Service Development and Transformation/ Invest to Save
Initiatives, of £120,000 per annum for 5 years from 2016/17. Approve delegated
authority to the Strategic Advisor, to invest this fund, in either one-off
projects, or to fund ongoing activity as required. m)
Approve the resulting Housing Revenue
Account Summary Forecast 2015/16 to 2020/21, shown originally in Appendix J of
the HRA Budget Setting Report, as subsequently amended and re-stated in full at
Appendix J to this report. Under Part 2 of the agenda, the Executive Councillor for
Housing is asked to recommend to Council (following scrutiny and debate at
Housing Scrutiny Committee): Treasury Management n)
Request that, in 2016/17, officers
review the existing approach to treasury management, which required 25% of the
value of the housing debt to be set-aside by the point at which the loan
portfolio matures, recognising the financial constraints that have been placed
upon the HRA as a result of recent change in national housing policy. A
separate report will be brought back to Housing Scrutiny Committee in 2016/17
following this review. Housing Capital o)
Approval of capital bids, shown in
Appendix D (2) of the HRA Budget Setting Report, to include meeting the capital
cost of re-locating staff to a single area housing office, with the cost to be
funded from existing repairs and renewals funds for the service. p)
Approval of amendment to the Decent
Homes Programme investment, recognising the ability to make savings of £810,000
in 2015/16 in respect of boiler replacements, roof structure works, communal
areas investment, garage refurbishment, asbestos removal and fire safety works,
as detailed in Section 5 and Appendix E (2) of the HRA Budget Setting Report. q)
Approval of the need to re-profile
resource of £570,000 from 2015/16 into 2016/17 in respect of roof covering
works and bathroom replacements, and £102,000 from 2015/16 into later years of
the programme in respect of remedial works due to sulphate, as detailed in
Section 5 and Appendix E (2) of the HRA Budget Setting Report. r)
Approval of the latest budget, spend
profile and funding mix for each of the schemes in the new build programme, as
detailed in Section 5 and Appendix H of the HRA Budget Setting Report, and
amended by this report, recognising the most up to date information available
as each scheme progresses through the design, planning, build contract and
completion process. s)
Recognition of the need to incorporate
into the Housing Capital Investment Plan, grants awarded by the Homes and
Communities Agency in respect of Aylesborough Close,
Water Lane, Ditchburn Place and Clay Farm. t)
Approval to earmark the required level
of additional funding for new build investment between 2016/17 and 2017/18 to
ensure that commitments can be met in respect of the investment of all right to
buy receipts retained by the authority, up to the end of September 2015. u)
Approval to invest net HRA
resource of £1,764,000 (£5,564,000 build cost less £3,800,000 sales receipts at
base year prices), over and above that already approved for land assembly
costs, for the re-development of Anstey Way, as a mixed tenure scheme
comprising 24 social rented homes and 10 dwellings for market sale. v)
Approval of
allocation of funds for a scheme to re-develop a mixed use HRA site in Akeman Street, to deliver a mixed tenure scheme comprising
8 social rented homes and 2 dwellings for market sale, subject to the approval
of a separate report for the scheme with recommendations amended as proposed by
this amendment, when considered in Part 2 of this committee agenda. w) Approval
of the revised Housing Capital Investment Plan as shown in Appendix K of the
HRA Budget Setting Report, as amended by Appendix K to this report.
Scrutiny
Considerations of Liberal Democrat Alternative Budget amendment The Committee made the following comments in response to the report:
i.
Questioned the advantages to be had from using
private developers to develop Anstey Way.
ii.
Suggested that the proposals would result in asset
stripping and stated that the best reserve for the Council was housing stock
and land. Councillor Avery
stated that he was not in favour of selling off land but that there was a need
to deliver social housing as soon as possible. Delivering Anstey Way would be
sending Central Government a message that Cambridge would continue to build
social housing. It would also generate income. The Chair noted
the Tenant and Leaseholder representative’s comments that it was unfair that
they could not vote on recommendations n to x. The following votes were chaired by Councillor
Todd-Jones The Liberal
Democrats Group alternative budget: 2
votes in favour to 6 against. The amendment fell. Resolved
(6 vote to 0, with 2 abstentions) to
endorse the original recommendations n to x and y (noting the corrected
numbering) of the budget proposals. The following vote was chaired by Diana Minns (Vice
Chair /Tenant Representative) Resolved (8 votes to 0, with 5 abstentions) to
endorse the original report recommendations a to m of the budget proposals The Executive
Councillor approved the recommendations. Conflicts of
Interest Declared by the Executive Councillor (and any Dispensations Granted) No conflicts of
interest were declared by the Executive Councillor. |
||||||||||
|
Budget Proposals 2015/16 to 2019/20 Report to follow Minutes: This item was chaired by Councillor Todd-Jones Matter for
Decision The
report detailed the budget proposals relating to the portfolio that were
included in the Budget Setting Report (BSR) 2016/17 and which would be
considered at the following meetings: Date Committee Comments 18 January 2016 Strategy & Resources 21 January 2016 The Executive 8 February 2016 Strategy & Resources 25 February 2016 Council
The report included a recommendation concerning the review
of charges for this portfolio. Decision
of Executive Councillor for Housing The
Executive Councillor for Housing resolved to:
i.
Review of Charges: Approve the proposed charges for this
portfolio for 2016/17 as detailed in Appendix A of the Officer’s report.
ii.
Revenue: Consider
the revenue budget proposals as shown in Appendix B of the Officer’s report. Reason for the Decision As set out in the Officer’s report. Any Alternative Options Considered and Rejected Not applicable. Scrutiny
Considerations The Committee received a report from the Principal Accountant / Business
Manager. Councillor Avery stated that he was not against the proposals but would
be abstaining from the vote. The Committee resolved by 6 votes to 0 to endorse the recommendation. The Executive
Councillor approved the recommendations. Conflicts of
Interest Declared by the Executive Councillor (and any Dispensations Granted) No conflicts of
interest were declared by the Executive Councillor. |
||||||||||
|
Council New Build Redevelopment 74-82 Akeman Street - Scheme Approval Additional documents:
Minutes: This item was chaired by Councillor Todd-Jones Matter for
Decision The
report provided details of the proposal to redevelop the shops and flats at
74-82 Akeman Street to provide 10 new homes. The area currently consisted of 5 No. commercial
units with flats above and associated land to the rear. Decision
of Executive Councillor for Housing
i.
Noted the indicative mix of the proposed scheme.
ii.
Approved the scheme capital budget of £1,985,510 as detailed in the
report to cover the construction cost of the scheme and professional fees and
other costs, also noting that a final scheme will be brought back to committee
for scrutiny and approval.
iii.
Approved that delegated authority be given to the Director of Customer
and Community Services following consultation with the Head of Legal Services
to seal a contract with the chosen contractor following procurement in
accordance with Council regulations. Reason for the Decision As set out in the Officer’s report. Any Alternative Options Considered and Rejected Not applicable. Scrutiny
Considerations The Committee received a report from the Head of Strategic Housing. The
Committee noted an error in the recommendations. Recommendation ii should have
read £1,985,510 as at 4 (a) of the report. The Committee made the following comments in response to the report:
i.
Welcomed the report.
ii.
Suggested that the development would help to break
down social barriers in the area.
iii.
Suggested that at a time of housing need, there was
an opportunity to increase the density of the site without losing the quality. iv.
The commercial units were an asset to the community
and should be retained if possible. The Chair stated that the
existing Community Room was an important element of the site for meeting
community needs in an ethnically mixed area. The final scheme might be quite
different to the original plan. It was hoped that there would be an opportunity
for tenants being decanted to return, if they wished, once the scheme was
completed. The Committee resolved by 6 votes to 2 to endorse the amended recommendations. The Executive
Councillor approved the recommendations. Conflicts of
Interest Declared by the Executive Councillor (and any Dispensations Granted) No conflicts of
interest were declared by the Executive Councillor. |
||||||||||
|
HOUSING COMPANY - Lettings and Rent Policy Minutes: This item was chaired by Councillor Todd-Jones Matter for
Decision As the Housing Scrutiny Committee was the Council’s main committee that scrutinises housing services, the Committee was requested to comment on the proposed Lettings and Rent Policy for the Council’s new ‘pilot’ Housing Company. Decision
of Executive Councillor for Housing
i.
Noted the comments of the Housing Scrutiny
Committee on the proposed Lettings and Rent Policy for the new ‘pilot’ Housing
Company. Reason for the Decision As set out in the Officer’s report. Any Alternative Options Considered and Rejected Not applicable. Scrutiny
Considerations The Committee received a report from
the Head of Strategic Housing regarding the Housing Company – Lettings and Rent
Policy. The Committee made the following
comments in response to the report:
i.
The scheme pilot was welcomed.
ii.
Questioned the affordability of rents
at 80% of the upper quartile of market rents.
iii.
Suggested there was a risk to the
general fund as the profit margins would be very narrow.
iv.
Suggested that a wider tenure mix
might make the scheme more financially viable.
v.
Expressed concerns that Right to Buy
Exceptions could be changed making these properties vulnerable to Right to Buy applications. In response to Members questions the
Head of Strategic Housing stated that:
i.
The tenancies would be offered on
standard assured short hold conditions.
ii.
Potential tenants would be subject to income
checks as with any private rental arrangement.
iii.
Rents would be subject to an annual
rent rise. The Committee unanimously resolved to endorse the recommendations. The Executive
Councillor approved the recommendations. Conflicts of
Interest Declared by the Executive Councillor (and any Dispensations Granted) No conflicts of
interest were declared by the Executive Councillor. |
||||||||||
|
Social Lettings Agency Model Additional documents: Minutes: This item was chaired by Councillor Todd-Jones Matter for
Decision The Council had been piloting a social lettings (Town Hall Lettings) agency for two years. The report built on the report presented to Housing Scrutiny Committee in March 2015 and aimed to inform Members of the proposed direction of travel for Town Hall Lettings beyond April 2016. The report detailed the outcomes delivered by the social lettings agency to date, covered the proposed role for THL in managing the intermediate market and outlined the business plan moving forward. Decision
of Executive Councillor for Housing i.
Noted that the proposed role for Town Hall Lettings in managing the
‘intermediate market’ properties as set out in the officer’s report and
appendix 1 ii.
Noted the 5 year business plan for Town Hall Lettings as detailed in
appendix 1 Reason for the Decision As set out in the Officer’s report. Any Alternative Options Considered and Rejected Not applicable. Scrutiny
Considerations The Committee received a report from
the Housing Advice Service Manager regarding the Social Lettings Agency Model. Members questioned the 7 year subsidy
included in the plan and asked if this had been a factored in to the pilot
projections. The
Housing Advice Service manager stated that: i.
An assumption of tenant turnover in
the first three years was in line with the experience of the private sector and
had little financial impact on the project. ii.
Tenant deposits would be held in line
with the legal requirements of letting arrangements.
iii.
Agency fees of 2 to 3% were considerable
less that high street agencies that typically charged
10 to 11%. The Committee resolved unanimously to endorse the recommendation. The Executive
Councillor approved the recommendations. Conflicts of Interest
Declared by the Executive Councillor (and any Dispensations Granted) No conflicts of
interest were declared by the Executive Councillor. |
||||||||||
|
Exclusion of the Press and Public The Scrutiny Committee resolved to exclude members of the public from the meeting on
the grounds that, if they were present, there would be disclosure to them of
information defined as exempt from publication by virtue of paragraph 3 of Part 1 of Schedule 12A of the Local
Government Act 1972. |
||||||||||
|
Recommendation to sell 12 Mortlock Avenue to Cambridgeshire County Council and buy 188 Kendal Way from the County Council Minutes: This item was chaired by Councillor Todd-Jones Matter for
Decision Recommendation to sell 12 Mortlock
Avenue to Cambridgeshire County Council and to purchase 188 Kendal Way from
Cambridgeshire County Council. Decision
of Executive Councillor for Housing
i.
Approved
the Officer’s recommendations as detailed in the restricted report. Reason for the Decision As set out in the Officer’s report. Any Alternative Options Considered and Rejected Not applicable. Scrutiny
Considerations The Committee received a report from the Strategy Officer. The Committee unanimously resolved to endorse the recommendations. The Executive
Councillor approved the recommendations. Conflicts of
Interest Declared by the Executive Councillor (and any Dispensations Granted) No conflicts of interest
were declared by the Executive Councillor. . |
PDF 101 KB