Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Decision register
Decision Maker: Planning
Made at meeting: 07/09/2022 - Planning
Decision published: 07/09/2022
Effective from: 07/09/2022
Decision:
Councillor Porrer
withdrew from the meeting for this item and did not participate in the
discussion or decision making.
The Committee received
an application for change of use to residential with first floor extension.
Mrs Hawkins
(Applicant’s Agent) addressed the Committee in support of the application.
The Committee:
Resolved (by 5 votes to 1) to grant the application for change of use in accordance with the Officer recommendation, for the reasons set out in the Officer’s report, and subject to the conditions recommended by the Officer.
Wards affected: Market;
Decision Maker: Planning
Made at meeting: 07/09/2022 - Planning
Decision published: 07/09/2022
Effective from: 07/09/2022
Decision:
Mr Unwin
(Applicant’s Agent) addressed the Committee in support of the application.
The Committee:
Unanimously resolved to grant the application for S73 permission in accordance with the Officer recommendation, for the reasons set out in the Officer’s report, subject to conditions and the prior completion of a S106 Agreement as set out in the Officer recommendation.
The Executive Councillor is recommended to: Note the findings of the Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman
Decision Maker: Executive Councillor for Climate Action and Environment
Decision published: 06/06/2022
Effective from: 28/08/2022
Decision:
Matter for
Decision
The Local Government & Social
Care Ombudsman Service has found “there was fault causing injustice” in
relation to a complaint about how the Council used rat poison at a residential
property within the City which incurred vet bills after their dog came into contact with it.
This customer also
complained that the Council failed to provide details of the poison or an
emergency contact number, causing distress and did not deal with this complaint
properly, causing them time and trouble.
Decision
of Executive Councillor for Climate Change, Environment & City Centre
Noted the findings of the
Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman Service in respect of this case
and the actions taken by the Council in response to these findings.
Reason for the Decision
As set out in the Officer’s report.
Any Alternative Options Considered and Rejected
Not applicable.
Scrutiny
Considerations
The Committee received a report from the Environmental Health Manager.
In response to the report Councillors commented that it showed the need
for signage and councillors noted actions taken by officers.
The Committee unanimously resolved to endorse the recommendation.
The Executive Councillor
approved the recommendation.
Conflicts of Interest Declared by the Executive Councillor (and any
Dispensations Granted)
No conflicts of interest
were declared by the Executive Councillor.
Lead officer: Claire Adelizzi