Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Issue
This item was
chaired by Councillor Thittala Varkey (Chair)
Matter for
Decision
The report sought budget
and approval to proceed with the redevelopment of Fanshawe Road flats, adjacent
houses, and garages to provide 93 new highly sustainable, affordable homes on
the site, with enhanced open space, as well as improvements to the community
pavilion on neighbouring Coleridge recreation ground.
Decision
of Executive Councillor for Housing
i.
Approved that the scheme be brought forward and included in
the Housing Capital Programme, with an indicative capital budget of
£27,937,291.53 to cover all site assembly, construction costs, professional
fees and further associated fees, to deliver a 100% affordable housing scheme
which meets the identified need in Cambridge City. Budget would be drawn down
from the sum already ear-marked and approved for investment in new homes.
ii.
Authorised the Strategic Director in consultation with the
Executive Councillor for Housing to approve variations to the scheme including
the number of units and mix of property types, sizes and tenure as outlined in
the officer’s report.
iii.
Authorised the Strategic Director in consultation with the
Executive Councillor for Housing to adopt option b; to deliver a minimum of 44
(approx. 47%) affordable homes for Council rent and the balance as market homes
for private sale, should grant not be available once the scheme is at a
deliverable point, subject to continued financial viability.
iv.
Approved that delegated authority be given to the Executive
Councillor for Housing in conjunction with the Strategic Director to enable the
site to be developed through Cambridge Investment Partnership (CIP) subject to
a value for money assessment to be carried out on behalf of the Council.
v.
Delegated authority to the Strategic Director to commence
Compulsory Purchase Order (CPO) proceedings on leasehold properties to be
demolished to enable the development, should these be required.
vi.
Delegated authority to the Strategic Director to serve
initial Demolition Notices under the Housing Act 1985.
vii.
Delegated Authority to the Head of Housing to amend the local
lettings plan for Cromwell Road to allow for the proposed decant from Fanshawe
Road to be accommodated.
Reason for the Decision
As set out in the Officer’s report.
Any Alternative Options Considered and Rejected
Not applicable.
Scrutiny
Considerations
The Committee received a report from the Senior Development Manager.
The Senior Development Manager, Director of Enterprise and Sustainable
Development and Head of the Housing Development Agency said the following in
response to Members’ questions:
i.
If
the redevelopment went ahead residents would be offered alternative housing at
the Cromwell Road development but acknowledged that this may not be appropriate
for everyone and that there was also alternative housing stock elsewhere in the
ward which could be explored. Pre-application advice had been sought from the
Planning Department some homes would be 2 storeys others estimate 3-4 storeys
in the middle of the development.
ii.
All
properties would need to be compliant with M42 standards and 5% of the properties
(approximately 4-5 properties) would need to be fully adapted for wheelchair
users. The ability to deliver passivhaus properties
had been explored however the orientation of properties was crucial as they
would need to be south facing and the early indication of the development
layout was that the properties would be east/west facing. The scheme would
include Passivhaus principles. Acknowledged that
there would be a trade-off between competing interests. The important factor is
the output achieved in terms of carbon emissions, fuel bills for residents and
low maintenance costs and not just the passivhaus
badge. The Council is involved with including passivhaus
pilots with learning to be fed back.
iii.
The
amount of bike storage proposed would accommodate the number of
bedrooms/occupants who would be on the site.
iv.
Officers
regularly checked the housing register to see how many people needed a fully
accessible home.
v.
Advised
that the council sought to build mixed and balanced communities when sites were
redeveloped. The inclusion of market
homes within a development meant that more affordable housing could be built.
The council had to be careful when selling properties not to act or apply a
policy which was discriminatory.
The Committee resolved by 6 votes to 0 to endorse the recommendations.
The Executive Councillor
approved the recommendations.