Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Calendar > Document library > Agenda and minutes
Venue: Buchan Street Community Centre, 6 Buchan Street, Cambridge CB4 2XF
Contact: Glenn Burgess Committee Manager
No. | Item | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apologies for Absence Minutes: Apologies were received from City Councillors Kerr, Tunnacliffe and Ward, and County Councillor Sales and Wilkins. |
|||||
Declarations of Interest Members of the committee are asked to declare any interests in the items on the agenda. In the case of any doubt, the advice of the Head of Legal Services should be sought before the meeting. Minutes: None |
|||||
Welcome and Introduction Minutes: The Chair welcomed the public and explained the format of the meeting. It was noted that The Meadows Community Centre would be holding an event to celebrate their 14 Birthday on 23 July 2011. The event would run from 11am – 3pm and all members of the public would be welcome. It was also noted that on the weekend of 9-11 September the City Council would be taking part in the University of Cambridge ‘Open Cambridge’ events. From 2pm – 3pm the Sergeant-at-Mace would be giving talks about the civic charters and insignia and the public would be able to see inside the Council Chamber and the Mayors Parlour. Mr Michael Bond informed the meeting that the Friends of Milton Road Library had set up a public survey on www.mycca.org.uk |
|||||
Community Consultation (CB4): Local Priorities PDF 67 KB The committee’s
community consultation, asking what people liked about living in north area and
the one thing they would like improved, concluded on 30 June. A large number of
people took part and returned CB4 postcards. Some of the issues were shown at a
community event on 18 June and the people who attended started to prioritise
them. You will be
asked to discuss at your tables, if a long-list of issues (displayed on the
screen) reflects what you think needs attention in north area and to then
prioritise a smaller number of issues and actions that could form part of a
community plan for the committee, to help direct its work over the longer-term.
Minutes: The Head of Community Development
introduced the report and gave some feedback on the CB4 Community Consultation
event held on 18 June 2011. Councillors and members of the
public were asked to consider the full list of issues arising from the “CB4”
engagement process (see appendix A). Through table based discussion groups,
two tasks were then undertaken. Councillors and members of the public were
asked to add issues that were thought to be missing, and to allocate a total of
up to 12 priority points to the augmented list. The Chair confirmed that a draft
Action Plan to address some of these issues would be brought back to the
September meeting based on the consultation and the table based exercises. It was agreed that the full list of issues raised at this meeting, along with the short list of priorities, would be added to the North Area Committee webpage. |
|||||
Improving Health in North Area Agencies involved in improving health in Cambridgeshire are looking to increase their understanding about what local people, of a working age, feel could reduce ill-health in north area. The final Joint Strategic Needs Assessment document (JSNA) will support general practice commissioning and inform a local Prevention Strategy. You will be asked to discuss, at your tables, what you think are the main causes of ill-health in the area, (from a long-list), and what services you think are important in tackling them, (from a long-list). Minutes: A representative of NHS Cambridgeshire introduced the item
and explained that agencies
involved in improving health in Cambridgeshire were looking to increase their
understanding about what local people, of a working age, felt could reduce
ill-health in north area. Councillors and
members of the public were asked to consider the main causes of
ill-health in the area and what services they thought were important in
tackling them. It was noted
that this information would feed into the Joint Strategic Needs Assessment
document (JSNA) that would then support general practice commissioning and
inform a local Prevention Strategy. It was agreed that the full list
of issues raised at this meeting, would be added to the North Area Committee
webpage. Councillors and members of the public were also encouraged
to complete the full Joint Strategic Needs Assessment survey via: http://www.cambridgeshire.nhs.uk/Have-your-say/joint-strategic-needs-assessment.htm
|
|||||
Additional documents: Minutes: The minutes of the 19 May 2011 meeting were approved and signed as a correct record. Update on Action List: Councillor Nimmo-Smith confirmed that he had forwarded responses
to
24 March ‘Open Forum’ questions (ref: public toilets and need to retain pubs
and shops) to Mr Michael Bond. Copies of the letter written by Julian Huppert MP to the
Metropolitan Police Commissioner regarding the Police handling of republican
activists in the run up and during the Royal Wedding had been circulated to members. Councillor McGovern confirmed that more information on Restorative
Justice, in the form of a Constabulary Presentation, was now available for members.
The Policy Authority would also be liaising with the Committee Manager regarding
a future presentation on the Policing Plan and Crime Commissioners. |
|||||
YOU WANT TO KNOW (OPEN FORUM) Minutes: 1) Resident: Highlighted that disabled people,
wheelchair users and parents with prams were having difficulty getting around
the city centre because of ‘A’ boards and street furniture. It was felt that
shop owners needed to be educated and made aware of these issues. Councillor Nimmo-Smith confirmed that he was aware of these issue and that the Leader of the Council was looking into them. Councillor McGovern confirmed that in his role as Executive Councillor for Customer Services and Resources he was responsible for city centre management. Discussions were ongoing with shop owners Resident: Questioned whether shop owners needed permits
for ‘A’ boards and street furniture and whether there would be a crack down on
those without the proper authority. Councillor McGovern responded that, whilst it was important that access be kept clear, when handled properly tables and chairs outside of cafes and restaurants were a nice feature of the city centre. ‘Love Cambridge’ also played a big role in management of the city centre and any member of the public would be welcome to join. It was noted that the County Council were responsible for ‘A’ board and street furniture applications and further information would be fed back at the next meeting regarding this. 2) Resident: Highlighted the good work currently being
undertaken with young people by Romsey Mill, and asked how it could be of more
service to the local area. Councillor Nimmo-Smith acknowledged the good work being undertaken by Romsey Mill and suggested that this could be looked at in more detail when a community plan was developed. 3) Resident: Highlighted the issue of poor lighting in
the Nuns Way area. Councillor Nimmo-Smith agreed to look into the issue with the appropriate officers. 4) Resident: Questioned the planting scheme agreed for
the Kendal Way Environmental Improvement Project and felt that more
consultation with residents was required. The Environmental Projects
Manager responded that the scheme had been agreed as a result of a site visit
conducted with the Executive Councillor and local residents. Resident: Stated that the
species selected for the planting scheme were inappropriate. The Environmental Projects
Manager responded that specialist advice had been sought on the species of
plant suitable for the scheme. It was noted that Street Scene would be
undertaking planting and future maintenance of the scheme. 5) Resident: Stated that
the Guided Bus had been delayed again and asked when the County Council would
finally take responsibility for the misuse of residents money spent on this
project. Councillor Pellew agreed to
progress this issue with the resident outside of the meeting. 6) Resident: Questioned whether
the City Council would help residents maintain pressure on the County Council
to retain and adequately resource Milton Road Library. It was noted that
Friends of Milton Road Library were currently carrying out a residents survey
that could be accessed via: www.mycca.org.uk
Councillor Nimmo-Smith
confirmed that City Councillors were notifying local residents through their
ward websites and newsletters. Councillor Pellew confirmed
that an announcement on libraries was due from the County Council with the next
few days. Resident: Confirmed that the Friends of Milton Road
library had a meeting planned with the Head of Libraries, Archives and
Information and he was hoping for ongoing dialogue to be established. These comments were noted. 7) Resident: Noted that he was impressed with the
Chair declaring the police priorities at the last meeting. It was felt that
democracy needed to be seen to be done and a ‘hand up’ vote would be the best
way to do this. These comments were noted. Resident: Requested an update on his suggestion for a
presentation at a future meeting on Restorative Justice. This was covered during item 11/43/NAC above Resident: Questioned whether the North Area Committee would
be seeking ‘Neighbourhood Forum Status’ for planning under the Localism Act and
whether the City Council would grant it. Councillor Nimmo-Smith stated that these where
important questions but, at this stage, was unable to give a full answer. 8) Resident: Suggested that the ‘Community Forum’
section of the meeting needed to be more structured and better facilitated. It
was felt that this would increase participation and minimize confusion. Councillor Nimmo-Smith welcomed the feedback and
confirmed that members and officers would work on these issues for future
meetings. 9) Resident:
Questioned how the City Council could afford to loan £42.5m to 18 other
local authorities when less than £5000 would be received back in interest
payments. Councillor Nimmo-Smith and Councillor McGovern
confirmed that the best way for the City Council to gain interest from
short-term investments was to deal with other local authorities. |
|||||
Environmental Improvement Programme PDF 440 KB Additional documents: Minutes: The Environmental Projects Manager reported the
progress on the following approved schemes: -
Downhams Lane renovation of
native hedge -
Akeman Street Planting -
Kendal Way Planting
Refurbishment -
Mortlock Avenue -
Woodhead Drive/Milton Rd -
Alex Wood Road Mobility
Crossing Member’s attention was drawn to the following
additional new scheme suggestions as included in the supplementary agenda document: -
Buchan Street Area Planting -
Gilbert Close semi-raised bed refurbishment planting -
Rear Block Hazelwood -
Perse Way Grass seeding and Shrub Removal The Environmental Projects Manager confirmed that the
County Council had very recently decided to apply their third party funding
policy to all City Council schemes that affected the public highway. In order
to achieve consistency in its third party funding policy across the county, the
County Council now required that the City Council funds any additional
maintenance liabilities, in the same way as other parties such as parish
councils. The City Council was currently reviewing this change and the impact
that it would have on the Environmental Improvement Project Programme. It was noted that any of the current
North Area Committee proposed projects that affected the highway may not
therefore at this moment in time be adopted. The Environmental Projects Manager confirmed that
further assessment of the maintenance liabilities needed to be carried out and
the value of any commuted sum required to be paid to the County Council from
within the Environmental Improvement Programme budget established. The following newly suggested Scheme Items (4.1, 4.2, 4.3,
4.7, 4.8 and 4.9 of the officers report) could not at this stage be considered
for funding from this programme until the maintenance liabilities had been
confirmed and evaluated with the County Council. -
Brimley Road Traffic
Calming -
Kendal Way Verge Parking
Prohibition -
Milton Road Verge Parking
Prohibition -
Victoria Park/Victoria Road
Verge Parking Prohibition -
Victoria Road Lay-by
removal -
Water Street/Water Lane
Closure Refurbishment Members discussed in detail
the option of deferring all of the schemes and bringing them back to a future
meeting. A decision was however made to, where possible, determine the
schemes. Brimley Road Traffic Calming (4.1 of the officers report) Decision: DEFERED Kendal Way Verge Parking
Prohibition (4.2 of the officers report) Decision: DEFERED to allow further
investigation regarding issues around the Traffic Regulations Order Milton Road Verge Parking Prohibition (4.3 of the officers report) Decision: DEFERED to allow further
investigation regarding issues around the Traffic Regulations Order Franks Lane Landscaping (4.4 of the officers report) Decision: APPROVED (by 8 votes to 0) that the scheme be progressed at an estimated cost of
£10,000. Highworth Avenue Planter Refurbishment (4.5 of the officers report) Decision: APPROVED (by 9
votes to 0) that the scheme be
progressed at an estimated cost of £5000. Rackham Close (4.6 of the officers report) Decision: APPROVED (by 9
votes to 0) that the scheme be
progressed at an estimated cost of £23,000. Victoria Park/Victoria Road
Verge Parking Prohibition (4.7 of the officers report) Decision: DEFERED to allow further investigation regarding issues around
the Traffic Regulations Order Victoria Road Lay-by
removal (4.8 of the officers report) Decision: DEFERED Water Street/Water Lane
Closure Refurbishment (4.9 of the officers report) Decision: APPROVED (by 8 votes to 0) that the scheme be amended to only include replacement
of the bollards up to a maximum cost of £5000 APPROVED (by 7 votes to 1) that additional consultation be undertaken on the
requirements of the wider scheme. Buchan Street Area Planting
(4.10 of the supplementary agenda) Decision: DEFERED
(by 5 votes to 4) until
the next meeting. Gilbert Close semi-raised
bed refurbishment planting (4.11 of the supplementary agenda) Decision: APPROVED
(by 4 votes to 3) that the
scheme be progressed at an estimated cost of £1,444 Rear Block Hazelwood (4.12
of the supplementary agenda) Decision:
APPROVED (by 4 votes to 3)
that the scheme be progressed at an estimated cost of £2,902. Perse Way Grass seeding and Shrub Removal (4.13 of the
supplementary agenda) Decision: APPROVED (by 4
votes to 3) that the scheme be
progressed at an estimated cost of £2,447
|
|||||
Appendix A - CB4 Consultation: Issues Minutes: APPENDIX
A “CB4”
COMMUNITY CONSULTATION LONG LIST
OF ISSUES A. Improvements in the
Street-scene §
Reduce the amount of
litter on the streets §
More dog bins §
Better pavements, as some are
uneven §
Reduce the amount of dog
fouling on pavements and in green spaces §
Improve the appearance of
recycling areas §
More frequent rubbish
collections §
Prevent dumping around flats §
Reduce parking on grass
verges §
Being able to park §
Too many cars parking on
bends §
Reduce the noise from the A14 §
Fewer cars §
Better care for trees B.
More things for young people to do §
Activities for young
people in the evenings §
More organised recreational
activities in open spaces §
Encourage clubs for 8 – 13
year olds §
Provide tennis courts §
Extend the opening hours of
the community centres §
Provide free Wi-Fi in the
area §
More activities on the river §
Local swimming pool C. To feel safer §
Increase the number of
police and PCO foot patrols §
More Rangers in the area §
Greater attention given to
disruptive families who can spoil it for the rest §
Prevent drug dealing §
Clamp down on drug taking §
People abusing alcohol and
being rowdy §
Anti-social behaviour outside
pubs §
Young people hanging around
in groups §
Feeling safe at night §
Reduce the number of
burglaries §
Too much late-night noise §
Reduce racism in the area D.
People to get along better §
More opportunities for
people to get together as a community (carnivals, etc.) §
Better promotion of the
good things about the area §
Work to reduce tensions where
people live close to each other §
Greater investment in local
services §
Encourage more people to get
involved in organising community events §
Improve the level of respect
people have for each other §
Local people encouraged to
get involved in local decision-making E. To get around easier §
Cheaper bus fares §
More frequent buses into town §
Buses should run on time §
More bus stops §
Reduce the speed of cars §
Better on-street parking §
Dedicated cycle lanes §
Reduce conflict between
cyclists and pedestrians on pavements §
More speed restricted areas §
Better lighting on cycle
paths §
Being able to use Park and
Ride without driving to Milton §
Less congestion F. Better shops §
Encourage new tenants for
shops with a wider range §
Bigger retail outlets in area §
A local bank §
More charity shops §
A good coffee shop G. Improved green open
spaces §
Cleaner playgrounds with
regular maintenance §
Better equipped
playgrounds, with more equipment for young children §
More playgrounds §
More fitness equipment in
open spaces §
Fences around playgrounds to
keep dogs out §
Reduce the number of
overhanging trees §
Help for older people to
maintain their gardens H. To keep libraries in the area open and maintain opening
hours I. More local jobs with decent pay J.
Better local housing §
Improve the quality of social
housing §
Provide affordable rents §
Reduce the amount of
high-density housing §
Bigger gardens §
More affordable house prices K. Health inequalities reduced §
Easier access to GP surgeries §
More “give up smoking” groups Possible Hotspots A. Improvements in the Streetscene
i) Students leaving litter around Tesco
ii) Uneven
pavements on Campkin Road and Mitcham’s Corner iii)Support for community clean-ups B. More things for young people to do i) Improve Nun’s Way Recreation Ground C. To feel safer i) Look at anti-social behaviour at Cam
Causeway, Hawkins Road and
Sackville Close E. To get around easier i)
Look at cycling along Arbury and Histon Roads
|