Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Agenda and minutes
Venue: Shirley Primary School, Nuffield Road, Cambridge CB4 1TF. View directions
Contact: Toni Birkin Committee Manager
No. | Item | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Election of Chair and Vice Chair - NAC Minutes: The North Area Committee Lead Officer assumed the Chair and invited
nominations for the Chair. Councillor Bird was proposed by Councillor Todd-Jones, and seconded by
Councillor Sarris. On a show of hands, Councillor Bird was elected unanimously. She assumed the Chair. The Chair invited nominations for the Vice Chair. Councillor Todd-Jones was proposed by Councillor Sargeant
and seconded by Councillor Gawthrope. On a show of hands, Councillor Todd-Jones was elected unanimously. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Apologies for Absence Minutes: Apologies were received from Councillors O’Reilly, Price and Manning. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Welcome and Introduction (including Declarations of Interest) Minutes: The Chair welcomed the new city councillor for Arbury elected in May, Councillor Patrick Sheil and County Councillors Scutt and Meschini. No declarations of interest were made. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Minutes: The minutes of the meeting held on 2 March were approved as a correct
record and signed by the Chair. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Updated Action Sheet PDF 151 KB Minutes:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
You Want to Know (Open Forum) Minutes: Members of the public asked a number of questions, as set out below. 1. Lillian Rundblad raised the following issues:
i.
In the Cambridge
Residents’ Parking Scheme, Extension Delivery Plan, for Zone 12, only the
southern area of Histon Road was included. It was,
therefore, likely that the northern area would experience displaced commuter
parking when the plan comes into force. She requested whether a Local Highways
Initiative (LHI) bid be proposed regarding double yellow lines on Carisbrooke
Road, running along the edge of Mayfield School towards Warwick Road? A
positive response in support of this idea had been received from the Head at
Mayfield School.
ii.
Queried why there
was no public transport link from the Histon Road
area to the new Cambridge North Station. Would it be possible for the Guided
Bus to stop at Akeman Street bus stop? Councillor Todd-Jones said that in relation to the
anticipated parking displacement issues, he would like to liaise with Mayfield
School and the Highways Officer to initiate discussion about a project based
around safety outside the school and where double yellow lines may be required.
If an LHI bid was required it could be submitted with the next round of bids
later in the year. Councillor Scutt
highlighted the difficulty created by boundary changes which had made it
unclear whether her query should be raised in this area committee or West Area
Committee. The McManus estate is in the city Castle zone but the Arbury county
zone and County is responsible for highways related issues. A discussion needed
to be had with the Executive City Councillor on how issues are dealt with when
they cross boundaries. Councillor Scutt would be
prepared to sit on West Area Committee if this helped the situation. Councillor Smart suggested that perhaps the yellow
lines could be paid for and incorporated within the package of measures under
the Cambridge Residents Parking Scheme. Lillian Rundblad responded
by confirming that Zone 12 did not cover the relevant parking area and
therefore could not be incorporated in the City Deal money. Action Point: Councillor Todd-Jones to liaise with Mayfield School and
Highways Officers about the potential for implementing double yellow lines. Action Point: Democratic Services Manager to clarify implications of
boundary changes on the Area Committee decision process. 2. Kay
raised the following issue: i.
Road repairs had
been undertaken on one half of French’s Road, when would the other half be
completed? Councillor Scutt
confirmed that she was on the County Council Highways Committee. There was
still funding available so enquires would be made. Councillor Todd-Jones confirmed that the
yellow lines and the areas in most need of repair on French’s Road had already
been addressed. ACTION POINT: Councillor Scutt to report back
regarding whether the second half of French’s Road would be repaired. 3. Barbara Taylor raised the following issue:
i.
Expressed
concern over the illegal parking on Milton Road verges. Councillor Smart had made enquiries but unfortunately this was not a police issue unless the vehicles were physically blocking pavements. County parking services had not yet responded; residents should get in touch with them to issue parking tickets when required. Councillor Sargeant suggested that reinforcing the double yellow lines would be the most appropriate way of tackling the issue. City Deal needed to be involved in order to do this. Councillor Bird confirmed that the police could issue warning tickets onto vehicles which warn of future potential fines. Councillor Scutt confirmed that if parking inspectors were informed of the times that the vehicles were usually illegally parked they could attempt to visit at these specific times. She encouraged residents to report incidents. Councillor Meschini confirmed that a number of LHI Bids to ban parking in certain areas of King Hedges had been successful so exploring this could also be an option. ACTION POINT:
Councillor Meschini to look into the possibility of applying for a LHI
Bid to ban parking on Milton Road. 4. Richard Spencer raised the following point:
i.
An
outstanding issue with Cambridge North
Station regarding a breach of planning permission concerning the destruction of
trees and habitat behind Long Reach Road. Councillor Sarris confirmed that he had been working with Councillor Manning to apply pressure on both City and South Cambridgeshire District Council Planning Officers to take action. He affirmed that in order for good relations to be maintained with the rail company they must respect their previous assurances. 5. Cab Davidson raise the following points:
i.
Had
the shared waste service undertaken a risk assessment to see what impact the
bin smell in hot weather had on the public?
ii.
The
City Deal had messed up the replanting along Arbury Road. Were they planning to
rectify this? Councillor Scutt highlighted that the Arbury Road replanting issue had been raised by other residents. She undertook to speak to City Deal about it further. Councillor Sarris confirmed that he would take up the bin issue with Executive Councillor Rosy Moore and report back. ACTION POINT:
Councillor Scutt to raise the concern
about the replanting of the hedge and border on Arbury Road with City
Deal. ACTION POINT: Councillor Sarris to liaise with
Executive Councillor Rosy Moore to establish whether
a risk assessment had been undertaken on the public health impact of waste
disposal in hot weather. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cambridge North Station Update Alan Neville: Greater Anglia Minutes: The Committee received a presentation from Alan Neville (Customer
Engagement Manager, Abellio Greater Anglia) which
provided an update on Cambridge North Station after its first month of opening.
·
The design and layout of the station was
contemporary with a community feel. ·
Cycle facilities were in high demand. ·
They have had a high media interest and focussed
heavily on promoting the new facility. Public feedback about the site and
services on offer had largely been positive. ·
Demand for the station was increasing weekly. ·
The official opening had been delayed because of
the pre-election period but plans were in place to hold an official opening in
the near future. The Customer Engagement Manager said the following in response to
Members’ and public questions:
i.
Greater Anglia had not given input on the amount of
female public toilets that had been built. He recognised that the current
allocation of two for the whole station was not enough, so confirmed that
comments would be fed back.
ii.
The lifts being out of order had been treated as a
very serious issue. Engineers had been called to repair them as soon as the
problem occurred and everything had been done to accommodate those impacted. Action was
being taken at Director level to ensure the problems
did not occur again.
iii.
There had been a few problems with the ticket
machines due to the model of machine being used. Efforts were being undertaken
to address this. iv.
Confirmed that Greater Anglia were
in discussion with local bus companies to discuss potential collaboration and
onward travel plans. He advised that if the Councillors and public had any
specific questions or would like to recommend bus stops on key routes then they
should email him; he would raise them at the next travel plan meeting.
v.
Directors from Greater Anglia were liaising with
their cycle guttering provider to fix the issues that had arisen. One of the
key problems was that the channel appeared to have been placed too near the
wall. A time span for repair could not be provided yet. vi.
Selective door opening from the train doors was
thought to be a problem with specific train companies who are working on the
issue. vii.
Confirmed that although it might seem unnecessary
for trains to stop a long way down the platform it was for complex operational
reasons; the signalling and birthing was based there. As this caused an
inconvenience to customers it would be looked into. viii.
The lack of adequate signage from Fen Road had been
raised prior to the meeting so action would be taken to provide more. ix.
A fixed date for the opening of the coffee shop
could not be confirmed. However, work had begun on building it.
x.
The train timetable would undergo changes based
upon service progress in the future; this was likely to improve links. xi.
They recognised that access for blind or visually
impaired people was not satisfactory. An officer from Cam Site had visited the
station to assess the design. The issues had also been raised with the head of
safety from Abellio Greater Anglia which they would
look to address. xii.
Confirmed that he could not comment on the amount
of time the gates were shut on the level crossing on Fen Road because Network
Rail were responsible for this. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brief overview of Wider Developments in the North Area Paul Mumford, South Cambs District Council Minutes: The Committee received an update from the Team Leader, New Communities at South
Cambridgeshire District Council regarding the wider developments in the North
Area. The presentation outlined ·
The proposed plans from Brookgate
for the development around Cambridge North Station and pre-applications which
had been received for locations in the North of the city. ·
The proposed new development of 6500 new houses in Waterbeach. ·
Large scale building proposals needed to be
considered before changes to the transport infrastructure could be made. The A10 study was
also currently underway; the outcome which would guide future application
processes. The Team Leader, New Communities said the following in response to
Members’ and public questions:
i.
The same developer from Cambridge Station was now
undertaking the work at Cambridge North Station; he assured that the problems
which had occurred at the former site would not be repeated. Lots of research
had been undertaken and all the applications were undergoing a strict design
process.
ii.
Cycle routes from the new Waterbeach
development to Cambridge were a top priority. Relocating the train station at Waterbeach was also an option that they may consider.
iii.
In order to ensure that developers did not deviate
from their agreed plans they would be subject to more intense scrutiny through
Planning Committees. This would ensure that decision making was accountable and
the position was clearer to developers. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Policing and Safer Neighbourhoods PDF 149 KB Additional documents: Minutes: The Committee
received an update from Sargent Misik regarding
policing and safer neighbourhoods trends. The report
outlined actions taken since the last reporting period. The current emerging
issues/neighbourhood trends for each ward were also highlighted (see report for
full details). Recommendations for future priorities were suggested and asked
to priorities. Louise Walbank, Anti-Social Behaviour Officer added an
update for the City Council’s perspective. The Committee and members of the public
asked the following question regarding the report: Q1. Councillor Bird asked if there had been
an increase in reports of child sex exploitation. If this was the case were
figures or statistics available? A. Confirmed that
child sex exploitation was certainly occurring but it would be wrong to release
specific figures. Work with the Make Safe Team was ongoing. Q.2 Councillor Bird asked if they would be
able to have feedback on the CCTV which had been placed on Fen Road. A.
The Anti-Social
Behaviour Officer confirmed that her team were now responsible for the
administration of CCTV. In order to provide feedback information and supporting
evidence was required. Q3. Councillor
Sarris raised the issue of communication between the public and police. He had
received a number of reports where crime and complaints had been reported to
the police but no response had been received. He too had reported a problem via
email and had not received a response. This issue was undermining the public
faith in policing. A. Confirmed that the police website had
advertised the incorrect email address and assured that this would be corrected
as soon as possible. There were alternative ways via the police website to make
contact with the North Area Team. Q4. Doug White
raised a concern about increased instances of vehicles racing along Kings
Hedges Road in the early house of the morning. A.
The
most appropriate way to report this issue would be to call 101. If specific
information detailing times and locations could be provided an application
could be made to investigate and attend during these periods. Q5. Councillor Sargeant queried why the six police priorities had been
created for them rather than the Committee feeding back the local priorities
reported to them by the residents? A. The police only attend area committees on a
biannual basis so six months would be too long to wait to outline issues. The
six priorities had been collated by the local North Area Team; they were not
city wide issues. The police held regular area team meetings to outline
neighbour priorities; Councillors were invited to attend these if they
wished Q6. Councillor
Austin asked if it would be possible to receive feedback on the enquiries the
police receive for North Area? A. Confirmed that it would be difficult to
quantify the data just for North Area because of the volume being received and
the way it is submitted. Q7. Councillor
Austin confirmed that bike theft across the city was increasingly difficult to
report because victims were asked for information that they could not provide
such as the time and locality of CCTV to the incident. Could some information
be provided so that Councillors can advise residents when reporting such
crimes? A. Bike theft needed to be reported by calling
101. Questions regarding the time, location and locality to CCTV were not
unreasonable; it allowed police to locate any CCTV images much quicker.
Resources had to be prioritised; watching hours of CCTV was not proportionate
to the magnitude of the crime. Q8. Councillor
Austin asked whether the child sexual exploitation priority had included
internet exploitation? A.
Confirmed
that online grooming played a part but that it was harder for the neighbourhood
team to police online crime. Q9. Councillor
Todd-Jones asked if it was possible for Councillors to voice the view of
residents and put forward some priorities for future consideration? A.
Affirmed
that the voice of councillors and residents was valued, the police encouraged
them to contribute. Q10. Councillor Scutt asked what work would be undertaken for road safety
if that particular priority was chosen? A. Selecting the issue as a priority allowed
officers to allocate more time and resource to it, focusing efforts and
monitoring progress. Increasing patrols and intelligence. He reassured that
work would still be undertaken on the priorities that were not chosen, they had
still been identified as issues for North area so they would not be neglected. Q11. Councillor Scutt queried the report by the Cambridge News that an
estimated 7000 offences had not been recorded by the police? A. There had been an increase in crime because
the way that all crimes were now recorded had changed. The new system involved
recording even the most minor incidents which previously would not have
required any paperwork, as such the statistic had seen an increase. As a
general principle they aimed to record above 97% of reported crime. Q12. Councillor Meschini had recently attended a Cambridgeshire Police and
Crime Panel where residents from the Orchard Park area were reporting high
levels of cyber bullying and cybercrime as a local issue. A. Trends had changed over the years and there
had definitely been an increase in online crime. However the focus of the
neighbourhood community team had to be on the ground rather than on online
offences. A member of the
public thanked the police for their continued efforts to tackle the antisocial
driving on Kings Hedges Road; residents would be pleased to hear that action
would be taken. Councillor Gawthrope suggested that roaming CCTV cameras should be
placed in key locations where the perpetrating vehicles of antisocial driving
regularly congregate such as the Business Park and on Kings Hedges Road. Richard Taylor
referred to an earlier statement by Sargent Misik and
queried why it should take hours for police to look through CCTV footage when
basic mechanisms of binary searching could speed up the process. Bike theft was
an ongoing problem so this could be an efficient solution. Richard Taylor raised an issue regarding communication with specific reference to the suspected package left on Kings Parade on 5 June 2017. Police had told the Cambridge News that they were not going to comment until the following day. Mr Taylor emphasised the importance of the role that the media played in informing and communicating with residents and that waiting for 24 hours was unacceptable. Richard Taylor queried why there were not any statistics available on traffic offences given that two of the priorities put forward were traffic related. Councillor Bird highlighted the increase in speeding and road accidents within East Chesterton. There were 6 recommendations of which the Committee was asked to nominate their top 3 for focus over the coming months. 1 Combating ‘county lines’ drug dealing. This work would be a combination of partnership working to safeguard vulnerable people and enforcement work against offenders. 2 Child sexual exploitation. The work undertaken in relation to this priority would be above and beyond the work carried out in relation to this issue. It would involve patrols of hotspot areas and other areas of vulnerability such as school gates to gather intelligence and deal with offenders. 3 Anti-social behaviour around Fen Road. This work would consist of increased patrolling of the area in question by members of the partnership team and supported by wider policing resources. 4 Theft from motor vehicles. This work would involve increased patrolling of areas suffering from theft from motor vehicles. 5 Road safety. This work would invovle high visibility policing to prevent and detect offences and continuing to promote SpeedWatch. 6 Anti-social behaviour in green spaces. This work would consist of targeted patrols of the various green spaces across the area. The Committee voted on each priority individually: 1. Combating ‘county lines’ drug dealing (by 3
votes to 0). 2. Child sexual exploitation (by 9 votes to
0). 3. Anti-social behaviour around Fen Road (by 8
votes to 0). 4. Theft from motor vehicles (by 5 votes to
0). 5. Road safety (by 10 votes to 0). 6. Anti-social behaviour in green spaces (by
10 votes to 0). Councillor Todd-Jones proposed a change to recommendation 5: · Road safety with specific reference to Arbury Road, Gilbert Road, Fen Road and Kings Hedges Road. The amendment was agreed with no one opposed The following priorities were agreed:
i. Child sexual exploitation.
ii. Anti-social behaviour around Fen Road.
iii. Road safety with specific reference to
Arbury Road, Gilbert Road, Fen Road and Kings Hedges Road. |