Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Agenda and minutes
Venue: North Cambridge Academy, Arbury Road, Cambridge CB4 2JF.
Contact: Toni Birkin Committee Manager
No. | Item |
---|---|
Election of Chair and Vice Chair - NAC Minutes: The Committee Manager took the Chair whilst the North Area Committee elected
a Chair. Councillor Price proposed, and Councillor Perry seconded, the nomination
of Councillor Todd-Jones as Chair. Resolved
(unanimously) that Councillor Todd-Jones be Chair for the ensuing year. Councillor Todd-Jones assumed the Chair from the Committee Manager at
this point. Councillor Gawthrope proposed, and Councillor Austin seconded, the
nomination of Councillor Perry as Vice Chair. Councillor Tunnacliffe proposed, and Councillor Bird seconded, the
nomination of Councillor Austin as Vice Chair. Resolved (6 by votes for Councillor Perry and 2 votes for Councillor Austin) that Councillor Perry be Vice Chair for the ensuing year. |
|
Apologies for Absence Minutes: Apologies were received from Councillors Sarris and O’Reilly. |
|
Welcome and Introduction (including Declarations of Interest) Minutes: The Chair welcomed the new councillor for West Chesterton, Councillor Mike Sargeant. The Chair noted the Committee’s thanks to former Councillor Mike Pitt, a former Chair of the North Area Committee, for his contributions whilst in office. |
|
To Confirm What was Said (Minutes) at the Last Meeting and What we Have Done (Action List) Minutes: The minutes of the meeting of the 31st March 2016 were agreed and signed as a correct record. The following updates to the action sheet were noted: 14/26/NAC Tree roots in Green End Road – Councillor Manning reported that the City Deal Board had discussed this matter earlier today. 14/74/NAC Chesterton Sports Pavilion – The Pavilion was now completed and was open would be available shortly for public use. 16/19/NAC Use of the Meadow Centre – Councillor Todd-Jones undertook to investigate further. 16/21/NAC Q3 Hanging Baskets – Completed. |
|
'This is Arbury' Short Film followed by Q&A Jane Rich, Director of Cambridge Community Arts will bring along some of the young people involved in making this short film about Arbury. Minutes: The Principal of North Cambridge Academy welcomed the North Area Committee and gave an update on the improved facilities now available on the site. The Committee watched a short film produced by students of the Academy. |
|
You Want to Know (Open Forum) Minutes: Q1 Doug Whyte: What can be done to improve the
street lighting in Callander Close? A. As street lighting was a County Council issue, Councillor Todd-Jones undertook to pass this question on the County Councillor Onasanya. Action: Councillor Todd-Jones / Councillor Onasanya Q2. Michael Bond: In
April there was some publicity surrounding the incursions onto Chesterton
Recreation ground by an individual exercising his trotting horse much to the
consternation of children and others using the recreation ground at the time.
When I investigated I found a section of fence between the recreation ground
and the joint user path had been cut away and removed to allow access for the
horse and trotting cart from St Andrew's churchyard. This access is still open.
When is it going to be closed? A. Councillor Todd-Jones reported that the City Council’s
asset management team were proposing to install sections of steel bow top fencing along this
small section. The fence will be approximately 1 metre in height and will be
far more difficult to damage for access. Q3. What action is
being taken to remove travellers from green spaces near the King Hedges Learner
Pool? A. Chief Inspector Ormerod stated that it was
difficult to move on travellers unless there were aggravating factors. Q4. City Deal decision regarding trees have been
delegated to County Council officers. Why are they not being taken in public? A. Councillor Scutt suggested Mr Taylor ask this question at the County
Council Full Council meeting. She also undertook to raise this with the City
Deal Board on his behalf. Action:
Councillor Scutt Councillor Todd-Jones stated that a Local Liaison Forum would be set up
soon to represent stakeholders in cross authority decisions. Councillor Manning stated that the initial meeting of the forum, on the
13th June, would not be open to the public as this would be a
procedural meeting. Future meeting would be open for public. Q5. Milton Road residents were concerned that the
County Council regarded their area as a route into the City Centre and not as a
residential area with its own needs. A. Councillors recognised the strength of feeling in the area. Q6. Why were hedges in Mere Way being removed? A. Councillor Todd-Jones stated that the need for improvement work to
footpaths in the area had been identified previously and money had been
allocated accordingly. Q7. What progress has been made regarding
improvement to speed bumps on Campkin Road. A. Councillor Onasanya reported that this work would be completed in the
next few weeks. Q8. Corona Road
Public Art (ornamental gates) might be lost due to a dispute between residents
and the developer. A. Councillor Sargeant undertook to investigate this matter with the
Planning Officer involved. Action:
Councillor Sargeant Q9. Member of the
public complained that they did not know who Councillors were, which Wards they
represented or which political parties they belonged to. Members introduced themselves. |
|
Stagecoach - Andy Campbell Minutes: The Committee
welcomed Andy Campbell, Managing Director of Stagecoach East and Tom Waterhouse,
Operations Manager at Cambridge to North Area Committee. The following questions were asked by
members of the public and Councillors. Q1 Why had the route of the Citi 8 changed so
that is now terminates at Drummer Street when it previously went on to
Addenbrooke’s Hospital? A petition will be presented to the County Council
seeking a full reinstatement of the route. A. This bus serves a rural community and the unpredictable nature of
Hills Road traffic caused timetabling issues and delays. Most bus users used
tickets that allow them to use more than one bus without additional expense and
once in the central area, there were a number of buses that allowed passengers
easy access to the hospital. A decision had been taken that termination at
Drummer Street would allow greater efficiency. Q2. Milton Road currently has a poor service.
Could the Citi 2 be re-routed for some of its trips? A. This would not be possible. However, increased demand as Waterbeach grows could lead to an improved services as some
future date. Q3. Would a bus lane be viable in Histon Road? A. Most of Histon Road was too narrow for this
option. Q4. Have cashless buses been considered? A. Cashless trips where encouraged and the online purchase of tickets
was increasing. However, some member of the public still preferred to purchase
on the bus. Q5. Milton Road was experiencing all the pain of
City Deal Improvements but would see little gain. A. The City Deal offers little extra profit for the bus companies. Any
changes would involve high risk commercial outlay. Q6. Would there a be a link from the Histon Road and Milton Road to the Cambridge North Station? A. There could be service changes such as the Citi 2 terminating at the
station or services from St Ives and Northstowe going
to the station. Q7. What can be done to give buses better road
priority? A. Increased use of rising bollards, bus lanes and improved signalling. Q8. Guided buses and Park and Ride buses should
stop more frequently in the City. A. This would make it less popular with those using it to come in from
rural area. Parking charges, and confusion about how to pay for parking, had
already reduced use of Park and Ride. Q9. Why do all buses go to Drummer Street? Have
orbital routes been considered? A. Service users want to go into central Cambridge. A proper bus station
was needed. Q10. The voice of bus providers and users is not
listened to by decision makers. Q11. Mitcham’s Corner is badly served by buses. A. This is an issue for the City Deal Board. Q12. Have tidal bus lanes been considered? A. This can work but signage and bus stop access would need careful
consideration. Q13. Citi 1 is full of students when it arrives at
Gilbert Road in the mornings. Can an alternative service be provided for them? A. Varying a service at certain times of the day is confusing for users
and unpopular. Q14. When will the Guided Bus service be
re-tendered? A. This is not a tendered service. Q15. Addenbrooke’s site is growing. What
infrastructure is in place for the increased demand? A. A new bus station could cope with double capacity. Also, a there was
potential for a rail station and an additional park and ride site at Four Went
Ways. Q16. Bus costs impact on young people. A. Operators need to cover costs. Q17. Disabled people feel discriminated against due
to lack of space and what space there is being occupied by push chairs. A. Drivers are instructed to assist disabled people and if an
alternative bus is not expected shortly, they can arrange alternative provision
such as a taxi. |
|
NAC Policing & Safer Neighbourhoods PDF 144 KB Minutes: The Committee received a report from Sergeant Wragg regarding
Policing and Safer Neighbourhood Trends. The report outlined actions taken since the
North Area Committee of the 20 January 2016. The current emerging issues/neighbourhood
trends for each ward were also highlighted (see report for full details). Sarah Steggles, Anti-Social Behaviour
Officer added an update for the City Council’s perspective. The Committee and members of the public
asked the following question regarding the report: Q1. Do drivers get
fined if caught speeding by roving speed units? A. Follow up action is taken. Q2. Is follow up action taken if drivers were
caught by speed watch volunteers? A. Follow up letters can be sent. Q3. Neighbourhood Watch signs, which had incurred
a charge to resident groups, had been removed during street lighting work. A. Councillor Scutt stated that this matter was under
investigation with Balfour Beatty and suggested that Neighbourhood Watch co-coordinators could contact Kate
Waite at Parkside Police Station for more information. Q4. Grumpy’s Corner, East Chesterton, continues to be an area
of concern. A. Joint working with the shop keeper last year
led to him installing his own camera monitoring the parking area in front of
the shops. This area could be added as a priority. Q5. Violent
crime appeared to be on the increase. Why? A. There has been an
increase in population in the area (Orchard Park and Growth of CRC). Also,
recording methods had changed. Q6. Why
is there no detailed information on domestic violence in the recorded
statistics? A. It was not
possible to break down the statistic into that much detail. The Committee resolved unanimously to
prioritise:
i.
Continue
with Class A drug work – this underpins much criminality and also impacts on
community safety.
ii.
Monitor
anti-social behaviour around Grumpy’s and the Fen
Road area. |
|
Environmental Reports - NAC PDF 1 MB Minutes: The Committee
received a report from the Community Engagement and Enforcement team. Community Enforcement officers were present to answer
questions. The report
outlined an overview of City Council Refuse and Environment and Streets and Open
Spaces service activity relating to the geographical area served by the North
Area Committee. The report identified
the reactive and proactive service actions undertaken in the previous quarter,
including the requested priority targets, and reported back on the recommended
issues and associated actions. It also included key officer contacts for the
reporting of waste and refuse and public realm issues. The following were suggestions for Members on what action could be
considered for priority within the North Area for the next quarter: ·
Continue to address litter left dropped on route
from CRC to local shops ·
Continue to tackle fly tipping. ·
Investigate litter around Green End Road Co-op. ·
Investigate fly tipping/litter around
Elizabeth Way underpass. – this falls within the East area and will be
monitored by the team The Committee resolved unanimously to
prioritise: Continue the
following existing priorities:
i.
Enforcement
joint working and patrols to deal with littering from students of Cambridge
Regional College in the areas of Campkin Road and
Nuns Way Recreation Ground and to work with the local businesses to address
litter from their premises.
ii.
Enforcement
patrols to tackle fly tipping on communal archways and green areas at Minerva
Way, Nuns Way, Campkin
Road, Arbury Court, Nicholson Way and Maitland Avenue area.
iii.
Patrols
to address dog fouling on Kings Hedges “Pulley” Recreation Ground, Nuns Way
Recreation Ground and Arbury Town Park including early mornings, evenings and
weekends. iv.
Enforcement
patrols to tackle littering issues from shops at Carlton Terrace, and deal with
waste management issues.
v.
Enforcement
patrols to tackle fly tipping and litter in the alleyway between Kinross Road to
Pakenham Close. New Priority: vi.
Monitor
litter and fly tipping around Elizabeth Way underpass. |
|
Additional documents: Minutes: The Committee noted the Community Events. |