Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Agenda and minutes
Contact: Democratic Services Committee Manager
No. | Item | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Welcome, Introduction and Apologies for Absence |
|||||||
Declarations of Interest Minutes:
|
|||||||
Minutes To follow. Minutes: The notes of the meeting held on 13 March 2023 were pending. |
|||||||
Matters and Actions Arising from the Minutes PDF 8 KB Minutes: No matters or actions from Minutes were discussed. |
|||||||
Policing and Safer Neighbourhoods EAC PDF 568 KB Minutes: The Committee
received a report from the Anti-Social Behaviours Officer. The report outlined
actions taken since the last reporting period. The current emerging
issues/neighbourhood trends for each ward were also highlighted (see report for
full details). Previous local areas of concern and engagement activity noted in
the report were: i.
Drug
dealing and associated anti-social behaviour, including threatening behaviour
and safeguarding of young people; ii.
Road
safety focussing on delivery mopeds and electric scooters illegally used on
public highways, particularly those vehicles at night without lights; iii.
Street
begging; and iv.
Supporting
the new (police campaign) expected on drugs with focus on frequent users and
the night-time economy. Previous local areas of concern and engagement activity
noted in the report were: Members welcomed and
supported the work of the Police and the Anti-Social Behaviour Team. Members
expressed concerns regarding:
i.
Littering
hotspot at Fison Road.
ii.
Illegal
encampments on Green Spaces.
iii.
Graffiti,
specifically at Mill Road Cemetery.
iv.
Illegally
modified motorcycles/cars and noise pollution. Anti-Social
Behaviours Officer added there was one update not in the report, it was
Anti-Social awareness week the following week. They would be scheduling a drop
in event at either Petersfield or Abbey. This would be advertised on social
media once confirmed. Members welcomed and
supported the work of the Police and the Anti-Social Behaviour Team. Members
expressed concerns regarding:
i.
Noise
pollution from vehicles late at night on Hills Road. Stated residents have been
recording the noise , including the dates and times of incidents.
ii.
A
Transphobic attack on Mill Road.
iii.
Regarding
illegally modified motorcycles/cars and noise pollution, would be happy to have
specific reports brought to him regarding dates and times of incidents.
iv.
People
riding non-Voi scooters.
v.
Bike
theft.
vi.
Would
like increased police presence at anti-social behaviour hot spots. Sergeant Neil
Campbell of the Cambridgeshire Police said the following in response to
Member’s questions:
i.
If
residents had complaints regarding vehicle nuisance on Hills Road stated, he
would be happy to send some units there at the times reported by residents.
ii.
Regarding
Transphobic attacks in city there had recently been 5 reports during the recent
Pride event in the city. Stated does not think it is a major issue in the city
however would be happy to be contacted about any specific reports to
investigate.
iii.
Police
had been stopping and advising people using non-Voi scooters about the law.
iv.
When
Police had a definite location of a stolen bicycle, they can enter that
property. However, if they do not know that a stolen bicycle in on the premises
they cannot enter.
v.
Had
regular meetings with management of Cambridge Leisure Park to combat
anti-social behaviour. |
|||||||
Mill Road Bridge Closure Verbal update requested by Chair from County Councillor Beckett. Minutes: As per request from
the Chair, Members received a report regarding the Mill Road Bridge Closure
from County Councillors Beckett and Shailer who provided a verbal report. He
highlighted the following:
i.
Works
were due to begin in early September and last 5-6 weeks.
ii.
Would
include full closures overnight for several nights.
iii.
Temporary
traffic lights would be installed.
iv.
May
be some daytime working.
v.
Details
would be publicised to the public before it happens.
vi.
Final
traffic restrictions would come into effect on 16 October 2023. There would be
a grace period of approximately a month when the enforcement cameras would be
live, warning notices would be sent out but there would be no fines issued for
that month period. vii.
There
had to be a road safety audit, site investigation and procurement of the
sub-contractor. viii.
Had
to do traffic management planning.
ix.
Rat
running along Mill Road would continue to be monitored. This would be done pre
and post implementation. If issues occured would work with public and
businesses to address any concerns.
x.
Generally
Blue Badges are for parking and placed in the windshield of a vehicle. However,
the Blue Badge scheme in relation to the Mill Road scheme, the Blue Badge would
be detected by the number plate. |
|||||||
Open Forum Minutes: Members of the public asked the following question(s): 1)
The Cambridge Playlaws Project will be coming to
Coleridge Rec on the Weekend of 01 July 2023 (See https://cambridgeplaylaws.fun/come-play/).
I was at the event at the Cambridge Leisure Park on 18 July and numbers seemed
to be on the low side. Please could officers and councillors ensure that: Posters are displayed in advance of the event
at nearby shops eg the Co-ops on Mill Road, Radegund Road, and Adkins
Corner/Perne Road, and also the Sainsbury's on Coldham's Lane. Ask a volunteer
to flier the nearby primary schools (eg Morley, St Philips, and Ridgefield) for
30 mins at the end of a school day. That the Coleridge Neighbourhood Forum
and/or Cambridge City Council has a small marque similar to what Abbey had with
their Big Lunch event with both information and interactive activities for the
public. (Ranging from what they want to see more of in the neighbourhood to
asking what they would be prepared to do in return to help make things happen -
similar to the processes of Neighbourhood Agreements piloted in Oldham in the
2000s http://moarcommunities.com/services/neighbourhood-agreements/) Invite local community groups to have 'pop up
stalls' (eg the Museum of Cambridge, CamCycle) nearby . I'd be interested in having a pop up stall for
the Cambridgeshire Association for Local History which meets monthly at St John
the Evangelist Church where Queen Edith's ward boundary meets with both
Trumpington and Coleridge, so may be of interest to local residents. In response Members said the following:
i.
The playlaws project funding was S106 funding.
Events took place in specific areas. Had been actively promoting events in
those areas including in Coleridge. Had done radio and TV interviews with
artists.
ii.
The event in Abbey was part of focus on Abbey. It
was being promoted locally. It was aimed at children.
iii.
There was excellent outreach last year, including
pop ups. Hoping to do so again this winter.
iv.
Would be happy to put up posters for the event in
Coleridge.
v.
As Chair of Colegirdge Community Forum felt it was
a good idea to have a stall there. They were having a Cambridge Live event in
July. Having two close together would not be possible.
vi.
Does not have capacity for leafletting. 2)
i.
Can
you please provide both indicative timescales, and the approach that's
envisaged for the Mill Road streetscape design phase.
ii.
Rat
running along Mill Road and through South Petersfield will continue to be a
problem after bridge restrictions are in place. Can you please outline the
county council's planned approach to deal with this. In response Members said the following:
i.
Does
not have new on where the funding would come from as of yet.
ii.
Does
not have exact timescale.
iii.
Would
like to thank Mill Road People and would like any feedback they would have. iv.
It
was a priority however a constrained funding environment.
v.
Would
like to express frustration that this hasn’t moved forward more quickly. vi.
Advised
could explore other sources of grants and funding. vii.
Regarding
the Rat Run, everything that was done in regards to reducing it needed to be
evidenced beforehand. viii.
Councillor
Pounds stated that she has recorded actions going forward. 3)
We
have noticed that Mill Road toilets are permanently closed. Why you as local
Authorities promoting active travelling and from other hand closing public
facilities which are very important for public to use. Closure of Mill road
bridge and lack of public amenities will have a big impact on any activities such
as Mill Road Winter fair and other small gatherings. I would like to know the
reason for this decision and why Mill Road traders were not informed. In response Councillor Moore said the following:
i.
Council
needed to make savings and all public toilets were considered. Were among the lowest used toilets in the
city. There was also a high amount of vandalism. Toilets need to be cleaned and
repaired. Hard decisions needed to be made and decision was to close Mill Road
Public Toilet, amongst others.
ii.
There
was public feedback sought. 4)
“The closure of the Mill Road Bridge is
expected to benefit some businesses but prove damaging to others. The Council
have talked about improving the environment of the Mill Road and making it a
more attractive place to spend time and have claimed to be supportive of the
Mill Road businesses. My question to the Committee is how can permanently closing the Public
Toilets on Mill Road be anything but damaging to the Mill Road businesses? Can
the committee explain how closing a Public Toilet, designed with the disabled
in mind, can be considered compatible with our obligations to provide disabled
access to toilets in this important shopping community. The nearest
public toilets are in Gonville Place, Romsey Rec and Coleridge Rec. This might
be acceptable if you are young, fit and in good health but for many the closure
means it is now difficult to spend time in Mill Road.” In response Councillor Moore said the following:
i.
This and other public
toilets chosen for closure were the lowest used. The buildings would be used
for something else, that was currently being explored. If people had
recommendations would be happy to hear them. 5)
"The
developers of the land south of Coldham's Lane (east of Romsey and Coleridge
Wards, and West of Cherry Hinton) which although mainly in Cherry Hinton
touches on three of the East Area wards, has a website up at
https://www.cherryhintoninnovation.co.uk/ They have a
public event at St Andrew's Church, Cherry Hinton from 11am-3pm
https://www.cherryhintoninnovation.co.uk/june-exhibition. Please could
councillors invite their local residents interested/affected to go along to the
event (and share on their social media pages). Please could I
ask councillors and/or to get in touch with the developer's representative (see
the screengrab enclosed) and urge him to get in touch with Rail Future East
Anglia (https://www.railfuture.org.uk/East-Anglia) *and* the Combined Authority
to discuss possibilities of upgrading the railway line that runs along the
southern side of the development site. This is because their existing transport
plans are not nearly sufficient to cope with the amount of extra road traffic
that will be generated by cars and the proposed shuttle buses/public transport
on a road that historically has had traffic congestion problems for years. In response Members said the following: i.
Had contacted Coldhams Lane Residents Association
and had put them in touch with developers. ii.
Developers were looking at the site being a green
site. iii.
Regarding Rail Futures and the Combined Authority
regarding rail improvements. They are engaging with Network Rail to see if the
track could be doubled. Would continue to work with Network Rail and Rail
Futures to ensure longer term investment and improvements. iv.
Needed to look at impact of traffic congestion. |