Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Agenda
Venue: Downing Place United Reformed Church, 4 Downing Pl, Cambridge CB2 3EL
Contact: Democratic Services Email: democratic.services@cambridge.gov.uk
Note: Please note the change of meeting location
| No. | Item |
|---|---|
|
Apologies for absence |
|
|
Declarations of Interest |
|
|
Minutes |
|
|
Mayor's announcements |
|
|
Public questions time |
|
|
To deal with oral questions |
|
|
To consider the recommendations of the Cabinet for adoption There are none for this meeting. |
|
|
To consider the recommendations of Committees for adoption There are none for this meeting. |
|
|
To consider the following notices of motion, notice of which has been given by: |
|
|
Councillor Ashton: The Guildhall This Council recognises the historic and enduring
significance of the Guildhall as the ceremonial and democratic heart of Cambridge,
having served as the home of local governance and Civic life for over 800
years. The Council affirms that, notwithstanding the
transition to a Unitary Council, the Guildhall shall continue to hold its
rightful status as the principle venue for local democracy and civic
ceremonies, reflecting its heritage and ongoing role in public life. |
|
|
Councillor Hossain: Review and Amendment of Parking Policy for Morello Place, King's Hedges Background: Morello Place is a social housing area in King’s Hedges
(postcode CB4 2ZH), where residents are facing significant financial
challenges. Despite being council housing, the residents of Morello Place are
required to pay for parking. In contrast, neighbouring council housing areas,
such as Hawkins Road, Atkins Close, Wilson Close, and Jackson Road, offer free
parking for their residents, even though they share the same postcode. This
discrepancy creates an unfair financial burden on Morello Place residents and
leads to increased congestion in the surrounding areas. Issues: 1. Financial
Strain: Residents of Morello Place are struggling financially, and the
requirement to pay for parking adds to their burden. Meanwhile, residents in
nearby council housing areas receive free parking, which is fundamentally
unfair. 2. Increased
Congestion: Due to the cost of parking at Morello Place, residents often park
in surrounding streets, leading to congestion, blocked driveways, and
inconvenience for other road users. This negatively impacts residents’ quality
of life and makes the area less pleasant and more congested during peak times. Motion: 1. Review
and Amendment of Fees: We propose that the parking fees for Morello Place be
aligned with those of nearby council housing areas, ensuring fairness and
relieving the financial burden on Morello Place residents. 2. Equity
in Council Housing: We call for a consistent parking policy across all council housing
areas in Cambridge, ensuring that residents of Morello Place receive the same
benefits as their neighbours. 3. Immediate
Reversal: We request that the Council immediately reverses the current parking
policy at Morello Place to eliminate this unfairness and reduce congestion in
the surrounding areas. Conclusion: This motion aims to promote fairness and improve the quality
of life for Morello Place residents and the wider community. Action Requested: We urge the Council to consider and vote on this motion at
the meeting on 27th November 2025. |
|
|
Councillor Bick : A Thriving City Centre For All Our city centre, like others, continues to experience the
impact of both increased online retailing and neighbourhood convenience
shopping, yet council NOTES that: ·
Cambridge’s city centre is challenged to meet an
unusually wide spectrum of needs, as the core of two universities and a magnet for
tourism (both important contributors to our local economy), in addition to its
local residents who often feel the last to be considered; ·
There continues to be a strong aspiration for a
‘social crossroads’ where all parts of the community can meet a variety of
needs - still including physical shopping, but also access to services,
employment, leisure and culture at a scale which is not possible in other
locations where there is less easy public or active transport connection; ·
Although our city centre is not suffering from
the economic decline experienced by many others elsewhere, it is widely seen by
local residents as imbalanced towards the hospitality and tourism sectors, as
not providing for some parts of the community and as dominated by chains at the
expense of independent businesses; ·
The city council’s current plans for full
utilisation of the Guildhall, modernisation of the Corn Exchange and
refurbishment of the Market Square leverage the council’s own assets in
expressing confidence in a centre that is for all. Council BELIEVES that: ·
There is an opportunity for the council to use
the soft power of its ‘convening’ role for a placemaking initiative beyond the
current reach of planning powers, by working with the BID, commercial
landlords, the universities, cultural organisations and other public service
and transport providers to develop a vision to drive future developments and
uses in consultation with the public; ·
Stakeholders have a shared interest in
maximising value and pride in a city centre which is balanced, inclusive,
vibrant, accessible, clean, safe and efficiently managed - and this common interest needs to be activated;
·
The basic infrastructure of an inviting high
street must be vigilantly protected - including ATMs, banks, Post Office and
public toilets – and further developed, considering water fountains, wi-fi,
charging points, sympathetic waste collection and reduced highway
conflicts; ·
A new unitary council, by bringing together all
responsibilities for the public realm, offers the chance to develop an
integrated city centre management team, and that it would be beneficial now to
start early stage thinking about how this might be organised; ·
A thriving and inclusive city centre in
Cambridge must be complementary to successful neighbourhood centres in existing
and new communities in and around the city, which meet equally important needs. Council therefore CALLS ON the Director of
Economy and Place to scope out this wider placemaking project and report back
to the appropriate part of the council by summer 2026 on the form it might
take, and how it could be initiated in the short run and carried forward into a
new unitary council. |
|
|
Written questions No discussion will take place on this
item. Members will be asked to note the written questions and answers document as
circulated around the Chamber.
|
|