Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Meetings > Agenda and minutes
Venue: Council Chamber, The Guildhall, Market Square, Cambridge, CB2 3QJ
Contact: Democratic Services Committee Manager
| No. | Item | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
To elect a Mayor for the Municipal Year 2025/26 Minutes: Councillor Davey proposed, and Councillor Gardiner-Smith
seconded the nomination of Councillor Dinah Pounds as Mayor for the
Municipal Year 2025/26. Resolved (unanimously) that: Councillor Pounds be elected Mayor for the Municipal
Year 2025/26. Councillor Pounds then made the statutory declaration
of acceptance for the Office of Mayor. |
||||||||||
|
To elect a Deputy Mayor for the Municipal Year 2025/26 Minutes: Councillor S Smith proposed, and Councillor Nestor seconded
the nomination of Councillor Richard Swift as Deputy Mayor for the
Municipal Year 2025/26. Resolved (unanimously) that: Councillor Swift be elected Deputy Mayor for the
Municipal Year 2025/26. Councillor Swift then made the statutory declaration of
acceptance for the Office of Deputy Mayor. |
||||||||||
|
Additional documents:
Minutes: The following amendments were made to the minutes of the
meeting held on 17 March, (deleted text to be 25/32/CNL, page 52 of the agenda pack: Councillor Ashton proposed and Councillor Moore seconded a
motion of 25/26/CNL, page 35 of the agenda pack: Declaration of Interest, Councillor Bennett - Member of the
Low-Income Tax Reform Group, which had a large involvement in The minutes of the meetings on 24 February and 17 March 2025, including the Extraordinary Meeting, were then confirmed as a correct record and signed by the Mayor. |
||||||||||
|
To note the Returning Officer's Report that the following have been elected to the Office of Councillor East Chesterton – Bob Illingworth West Chesterton – Jamie Dalzell Minutes: Jamie Dalzell (West Chesterton Ward) Bob Illingworth (East Chesterton Ward) |
||||||||||
|
To Pass a Resolution of Thanks to the Outgoing Mayor Minutes: Resolved (unanimously) on the proposal of
Councillor Davey seconded by Councillor Holloway. This Council
expresses its appreciation of the manner in which the
duties of the Mayor and Mayor’s consorts were discharged by Councillor Baiju
Thittala and consort Ancy Thittala during their period of office. |
||||||||||
|
Mayor's announcements Minutes:
Apologies were received from Councillor Payne and Councillor Divkovic |
||||||||||
|
Declarations of Interest Minutes:
|
||||||||||
|
To elect from among the Members of the Council Bailiffs of the City for the Municipal Year 2025/26 Minutes: Resolved (unanimously) to: Appoint Councillors Gawthorpe Wood, Dryden, McPherson, Blackburn-Horgan
and Illingworth, Bailiffs of the City for the Municipal Year 2025/26. |
||||||||||
|
To elect a Leader of the Council The Council is required to appoint a Leader of the Council. Article 7.3 of the current Constitution states: The Leader will be a councillor elected to the position by the Council and will remain as Leader until the day of the Annual Meeting of the Council in the year their term of office ends or until: 1. death or disqualification; or 2. resignation from the office; or 3. removal from office by resolution of the Council. Minutes: On the nomination of Councillor Davey and seconded by
Councillor Wade it was resolved to: Elect Councillor Cameron Holloway as Leader of Cambridge
City Council. |
||||||||||
|
Notification of Cabinet Portfolio Holders Leader to notify Council of Cabinet Portfolio Holders. Minutes: Councillor Rachel Wade (Vice-Chair) Deputy Leader Councillor Gerri Bird
Cabinet Member for Housing Councillor Rosy Moore
Cabinet Member for Climate Action and Environment Councillor Antoinette Nestor Cabinet Member for Culture, Economy and Skills Councillor Martin Smart
Cabinet Member for Nature, Open Space and City Services Councillor Anna Smith
Cabinet Member for Communities Councillor Simon Smith
Cabinet Member for Finance & Resources Councillor Katie Thornburrow Cabinet Member for Planning & Transport Councillor Mike Todd-Jones
Cabinet Member for Safety, Wellbeing and Tackling
Homelessness |
||||||||||
|
To consider the recommendations of Committees for adoption |
||||||||||
|
Civic Affairs Committee - Cambridge City Council Constitution Additional documents:
Minutes: Councillor Porrer proposed the following amendment to the
Constitution, seconded by Young (Deleted text struck through, additional text
underlined). Part 4, section 1.9.1 (on page 105/173): On Line 2 delete The amendment was lost by 17 votes to 22, with 1 Abstention.
Resolved (21 Votes to 5, with 14 Abstentions) to: i.
Approve the draft Constitution, which includes
the LGA model Code of Conduct, and for it to come into effect at the Annual
Council meeting in May 2025. ii.
Note the Monitoring Officer has responsibility
to ensure the Constitution is up to date and lawful, including by making
‘housekeeping changes’ to ensure it is comprehensible and consistent as
required. iii.
Note that the Constitution will be reviewed
within nine months and any further changes to be adopted through the correct
channels |
||||||||||
|
Civic Affairs Committee - Report of the Independent Remuneration Panel Additional documents:
Minutes: Resolved (38 votes, with 1 abestention) to: i. Consider the report and recommendations of the Independent Remuneration Panel, as set out in Appendix 1. 2 of the report. ii. Agree the recommendations of the Independent Remuneration Panel as outlined in 8.2 of the cover report and for the recommendations to be reviewed in the 2025-26 municipal year. |
||||||||||
|
Civic Affairs Committee - Table of Appointments Additional documents: Minutes: Resolved (unanimously) to: Agree the appointments to city council committees and joint partner
bodies and appointment of Chairs and Vice-Chairs below (as updated by the
‘Update to Committee Appointments’ document contained within the Information
Pack). Performance, Assets & Strategy Overview &
Scrutiny Committee Membership: 8 + 5 alternates (5 Labour + 2 Lib Dem + 1
Green) Gawthrope-Wood (Vice-Chair), Griffin, Baigent, Davey, Sheil Porrer (Chair), Dalzell Clough Alternates Labour x 2 TBC, Martinelli, Bick, Bennett Services, Climate and Communities Scrutiny Committee Membership: 9 + 5 alternates (5 Labour + 3 Lib Dem +1 Green) Beth Gardiner-Smith (Vice-Chair), Pounds, Baigent, Divkovic Labour TBC, Young (Chair), Hauk, Payne Glasberg Alternates Tim Griffin, Labour TBC, Martinelli, Bick, Tong Civic Affairs and Audit Committee Standards Sub Committees will be set up on an ad hoc basis
as and when required comprising three *Membership: 7 + 4 alternates (4 Labour + 2 Lib Dem + 1
Green) McPherson (Chair), Gawthrope-Wood (Vice Chair), Robertson,
Sheil Dalzell, Bick Bennett Alternates Davey, Labour TBC, Young, Clough Licensing Act 2003 and Gambling Act 2005 Committee /
General Purposes and Licensing Committee Licensing Sub Committees will be set up on an ad hoc basis as
and when required comprising three members each Membership 10 (nb. 10 is the statutory minimum number for a
Licensing Committee) +3 alternates (6 Labour + 3 Lib Dem + 1 Green) Russ McPherson (Chair), Bird (Vice Chair), Swift, Wade,
Moore, Divkovic Blackburn-Horgan, Lokhmotova, Bick Clough Alternates A Smith, Illingworth, Flaubert, Bennett Planning Committee (these members will also sit on
Development Control Forums and Pre-application Developer Briefings as required) Membership 8 +5 alternates (if required per group) (5 Labour
+ 2 Lib Dem + 1 Green) Smart (Chair), Baigent (Vice Chair), Thornburrow,
Todd-Jones, Dryden Flaubert, Illingworth Howard Alternates Ashton, Gawthrope-Wood, Porrer, Lokhmotova, Bennett |
||||||||||
|
Appointments to Outside Bodies & Working Groups Minutes: Resolved unanimously to approve the following appointments: Outside Bodies: The Junction (Observer Status), 1 Labour, 1 Liberal Democrat Councillors Nestor and Blackburn-Horgan Cambridge BID, 1 Labour Councillor – Cabinet Member Adults and Health Committee, 1 Member, 1 Alternate member Councillor – Cabinet Member, Alternate Councillor - TBC Cambridge Community Safety Partnership, 1 Labour, 1
Alternate Councillor A Smith, Alternate Councillor – TBC Cambridgeshire Police and Crime Panel, 1 Labour, 1 Labour
Alternate Councillor A Smith, Alternate Councillor – TBC Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Council
of Governors, 1 Labour Councillor Todd-Jones Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Military Covenant Board, 1
Labour Councillor Davey Clay Farm Advisory Group, 1 Labour, 1 Lib Dem Councillors Wade and Hauk Recycling in Cambridge and Peterborough (RECAP), 1 Labour Councillor – Cabinet Member Cambridge Airport Consultative Committee, 1 Member Councillor Robertson Members Active Travel Steering Group, 5 Labour, 3 Liberal
Democrat Councillors Thornburrow, Baigent, Pounds, Nestor, S Smith,
Lee, Dalzell and Hauk East West Main Line Partnership Board, 1 Labour, 1 reserve Councillor Thornburrow, Reserve Councillor – TBC EWR Eastern Section Board, 1 Labour, 1 reserve Councillor Thornburrow, Reserve Councillor – TBC Greater Cambridge Partnership Executive Board, 1 Labour, 1
Labour Alternate Councillor Holloway, Alternate – Councillor Baigent Water Resources East Strategic Advisory Group, 1 Labour, 1
Labour Alternate Councillor Thornburrow, TBC Flood & Water Partnership, 1 Labour, 1 Labour Alternate Councillor Thornburrow, TBC Local Government Information Unit, 1 Labour Councillor Griffin East of England Local Government Association, 1 Labour Councillor Simon Smith LGA General Assembly, 1 Labour Councillor – Leader Horizons Board, 1 Labour Councillor Robertson Cambridge Investment Partnership, 2 Labour Councillors Bird and S Smith District Councils Network, 1 Labour Councillor – Leader Advisory Council - Cambridge Growth Company (Homes England),
1 Labour Councillor - Leader Working Groups & Sub Committee’s Joint Staff Employment Forum, 3 Labour, 2 Liberal Democrat,
2 Alternates Councillors Bird, Moore, S Smith, Wade, Hauk, Flaubert Alternate Councillors – TBC, Bick, Martinelli Equalities Panel, 3 Labour, 2 Liberal Democrat Councillors Smart, Wade, Bird, Porrer, Martinelli Alternate Councillor TBC, Flaubert, Lokhmotova Housing Board* (Numbers to be confirmed by Leader), 5
Labour, 2 Lib dem, 1 Green + 6 elected tenant / leaseholders
reps Councillors – Robertson (Chair), Griffin (Vice-Chair),
Thittala, Gardiner-Smith, Gawthrope-Wood, Martinelli, Lokhmotova, Green Alternate Councillor – TBC, Lee, Blackburn-Horgan, Bennett Employee Appeals Sub Committee, 4 Labour, 2 Lib Dems Councillors Wade, Davey, Gardiner-Smith, TBC, Flaubert,
Martinelli Chief Officer Appointments Sub Committee (must include
one Cabinet Member) Membership to be drawn from Employment Committee on ad hoc
basis Investigating and Disciplinary Sub Committee (must include
one Cabinet Member) Membership to be drawn on ad-hoc basis from membership of
whole council Chief Officer Appeals Sub Committee (must include one
Cabinet Member) Membership to be drawn on ad-hoc basis from membership of whole council Cambridgeshire & Peterborough Combined Authority
Committees CPCA Environment & Sustainable Communities, 1 Labour, 1 Labour Alternate Councillor Moore, Councillor Todd-Jones CPCA Skills & Employment, 1 Labour, 1 Labour Alternate Councillor Nestor, Councillor Divkovic CPCA Transport & Infrastructure, 1 Labour, 1 Labour Alternate Councillor Thornburrow, Councillor S Smith CPCA Investment Committee, 1 Labour, 1 Labour Alternate Councillor S Smith, Councillor Robertson CPCA Overview and Scrutiny Committee, 1 Labour, 1 Labour Alternate, 1 Green, 1 Green Alternate Councillor Davey, Alternate Labour TBC, Councillor Clough, Alternate Green, Councillor Tong. CPCA Audit and Governance, 1 Labour, 1 Labour Alternate Councillor Divkovic, Councillor Todd-Jones |
||||||||||
|
Annual Statements Group Leaders will each have the opportunity to speak for not more than 10 minutes on their Group’s priorities for action and objectives for the forthcoming municipal year. Minutes: Group Leaders spoke on their Group’s priorities for action and objectives for the forthcoming year. |
||||||||||
|
Public questions time Minutes: Question 1: Cambridgeshire Action Over the past several years, two consecutive
governments have outlined extremely ambitious plans for growth in Greater
Cambridge. Meanwhile, the Greater Cambridge Partnership
(GCP) has persisted in advancing plans for busways that demonstrate extremely
poor benefit-cost ratios and that still fail to provide adequate capacity for
transport to key destinations such as the city centre and Cambridge Biomedical
Campus. All candidates but one in the recent election
for combined authority mayor favoured some form of light rail to meet the
region’s needs for transport in the Greater Cambridge area. Before wasting yet more public funds on two
public inquiries, does the newly elected Leader of the Council agree that is
time for a re-think of the GCP's outdated proposals for guided busways? In response the Leader of the Council said
the following: i.
Recognised that Cambridge and the surrounding
area had a crucial role in the regional and national economy. ii.
The Council did support additional housing and
infrastructure for the area if it was well planned and a sustainable way. iii.
Was aware that residents did worry about the
sustainability of growth in the area. iv.
The Council supported initiatives to promote
world-leading research and innovation in Cambridge that benefited people
globally, but this should not come at the expense of residents. v.
Enhanced transport links could play a vital role
in reducing existing inequalities. It was important that new investments
benefited all communities rather than deepening social divide. vi.
Improving transport infrastructure was essential
to meet the needs of both current and future residents. vii.
There was not a simple dichotomy between busways
and light rail. Busways created transport corridors that could in future be
converted into light rail. viii.
There had been technical issues with the
existing busway but when done right they were a clever piece of
infrastructure which could transport
many people quickly while retaining a level of flexibility. ix.
The busway was able to go around the town and
villages that the light railway system could not necessarily access. x.
The busway would be cheaper than the light rail
for users. xi.
The preparatory work of the busway was more
advanced and the cost of infrastructure significantly cheaper. xii.
Would welcome further conversations regarding
light rail but it had to be accepted it was a higher cost and a longer-term
solution. xiii.
Busways could provide vital transport links
which could be install while considering what might come next. Supplementary Question The CSET (Cambridge Southeast Transport
Scheme) busway which was intended to accommodate current and future travel
demands to the Cambridge biomedical campus due to be completed before 2029 at
the earliest. According to the GCP’s own forecast peak
capacity of the busway which was 600 passengers per hour was likely to be
exceeded in the morning rush hour as early as 2036. Did the Leader of the Council have any
reservations about spending £162million of public funds on a transport
infrastructure that was expected to provide insufficient capacity after seven
years. Before wasting yet more public funds on two
public inquiries, was it not time for the GCP to admit that the organisation
busway proposals required a rethink? The Leader responded:
i.
If the busway did not to go ahead the issues
outlined would get worse. ii.
While it was important to explore alternative
solutions such as light rail, abandoning the busway project at this stage would
risk deterioration to any existing problems. iii.
There was the potential for both a busway and
light rail. iv.
The busway could have a positive impact and
provide significant benefits. v.
The public inquiry would provide an opportunity
for residents to have their say and express any concerns. Question 2: Unitaries
and local government reform Cambs Unitaries
Campaign The Campaign for Unitary Authorities in
Cambridgeshire, has written to all councillors to set out some suggested
principles for determining how the new unitaries should be formed: www.cambsunitaries.org.uk/principles The key points are: 1.
There must be a genuine improvement in democratic accountability: changes must
increase democratic accountability while being able to take difficult
decisions. 2. Each council should have a coherent economic
area: Linking together areas with completely different economic outlooks would
mean a council ‘looking in multiple directions’, e.g. a council trying to
manage both Cambridge’s growth agenda and rural farming issues would not be
well-focussed. 3. Each council should contain a reasonably
coherent culture: Similarly, mixing areas that are very different culturally,
such as town and rural areas, would mean politicians from one dominating the
other. 4. Each council should cover a single travel
for work area: Density of transport requirements will be very different between
urban and rural communities, so different transport solutions will be needed. Additionally, we believe, unitaries should
reflect coherent housing/rental patterns, have clarity about funding (so that
more expensive aspects like social care can be sustainable), that councils
should be able to share services and work together (subject to maintaining
democratic accountability), and that councils must not be so large as to ‘lose
touch’ with people. We also believe there must be clarity of
relations with a CPCA/Mayor: Although our organisation is opposed to the
existence of a mayoral position, we recognise that government will likely
retain it. It is not clear why it will be necessary in the context of, say,
three unitary authorities to have an overarching authority. For instance, it
would make little sense to have a Greater Cambridge Unitary Council, managing
issues like housing, growth and transport, but have another body set the
strategy for these. Does the City Council agree with the
principles we have set out? Will you push for a Greater Cambridge unitary
council that has clear powers to manage change effectively, with strong
democratic accountability, and which avoids looking in multiple directions. The Leader of the Council replied with the
following comments: i.
Thanked the public speaker on their work to
develop these principles and on the campaign which was a valuable contribution
to the debate. It was a very timely matter which started before the current
proposals came in from Government and was grateful for the detailed engagement
on this issue. ii.
The Government had set out the criteria for
local government reorganisation. Some of the principles reflected the feedback
that had been collected last year on the Council’s public engagement on the
future of local government in Cambridge. iii.
The public statement had highlighted the
importance of democratic engagement, putting residents first and making sure
that any unitary council covered a functional economic geography. It also gave
concern that a larger unitary authority could feel distant from residents.
These were all matters that been raised in the public engagement. iv.
Agreed with the principles underpinning the
Government’s criteria, including the importance of democratic accountability,
coherence within economic areas, and consideration of transport and local
identity. Additionally, it was recognised that high-quality service delivery
and sustainable growth were essential, and that unitary authorities would be of
a sufficient size to remain resilient in the face of financial challenges. v.
The City Council would advocate for a unitary
council that at its core was designed to improve the lives and life chances of
the residents. vi.
Wanted to manage expectations about this
process, a solution was needed that worked for Cambridgeshire and Peterborough
and would work with Council Leaders to achieve that goal. vii.
The preference would be for Cambridgeshire and
Peterborough as an area to put forward a single proposal for local government
reorganisation. If this was not feasible the Council would make a case for the
option best placed for the Cambridge area. Supplementary Question As Cambridge City Council could not stand on
its own it was important to look at the wider area. Would joining with the East
Cambridgeshire area which had large rural areas, not subjected to the pull of
Cambridge and all its growth-related issues, lead to a Council looking in
multiple directions than being focused? The Leader responded with the following: i.
Agreed that the majority of debate focused on
specific geography of the council and how many unitaries there were likely to
be. ii.
Had not yet spoken with all the other Local
Authority Leaders but would be working together to reach a solution and would
reiterate if this would not be feasible, the Council would make a case for the
option best placed for the Cambridge area. iii.
It was important for there to be further public
consultation. The recent Oxford City Council motion on
ethical procurement can be seen here: https://mycouncil.oxford.gov.uk/mgAi.aspx?ID=41670
Cambridge Palestine Solidarity Campaign is
grateful to Cambridge City Council for the Mayor's repeated statements calling
for a ceasefire in Gaza. We are proud that Cambridge was the first council to
call on the government to immediately revoke all licences for arms exports to
Israel and to suspend arms sales. We also thank the Council for allowing us to
hold two exhibitions in the Guildhall earlier this year, which provided a
valuable platform for raising awareness. As you will be aware, the situation in Gaza
has continued to deteriorate. Israel has blocked all aid from entering Gaza
since 2nd March 2025. Bombing resumed following
Israel’s breach of the ceasefire agreement on 18th March[1]
and has been relentless. Hospitals, in particular, appear to be
deliberately targeted. On 15th May (Nakba Day), “Operation Gideon’s
Chariots”[2] was launched with the
stated aim of taking full control of Gaza. In just 36 hours, at least 250
people were killed[3]. The figure had risen
to 500 after 72 hours[4]. Meanwhile, in the West Bank, displacement,
land appropriation, arbitrary detention, extrajudicial killings, and attacks on
vital infrastructure continue unabated. Area C is, in effect, being annexed[5]. Over the past year and seven months, the UK
government has continued to arm Israel, despite Foreign Secretary David Lammy’s
claim that “UK exports are not what would be routinely described as arms” — a
statement that is demonstrably untrue[6].
The UK has also supported Israeli operations through over 500 surveillance
flights over Gaza[7]. These actions arguably
render the UK complicit in war crimes[8]. Following the announcement in September 2024
of the suspension of around 30 export licences for items destined for the
Israeli Defence Forces, the UK still approved the export of £127.6 million
worth of military equipment to Israel between October and December 2024 —
exceeding the total exported during the entire period from 2020 to 2023 under
the previous government[9]. The
government has consulted the Israeli embassy about the prosecution of British
protestors[10]. British journalists have been
persecuted for critical reporting of Israel's actions[11].
Despite the International Court of Justice finding it plausible that Israel’s
acts could amount to genocide[12] — and the obligation of parties to the
Genocide Convention to take measures to prevent such acts — our government
continues to maintain that there is a “tenable view that no genocide has
occurred or is occurring,” regardless of overwhelming evidence of the
deliberate targeting of civilians, including children[13]. Polls
have shown that the British public supports an immediate ceasefire and a ban on
arms sales to Israel[14], yet both the current and former
governments have failed to act accordingly. A
quarter of sitting MPs, including over half the current Cabinet, have received
funding from pro-Israel lobby groups and individuals[15]. It
is evident that Israel exercises a disproportionate influence over our
political system, and the public must turn to our local representatives to
reflect our views. Will the Council: ·
Reaffirm its demand that the UK government
immediately revoke all licences for arms exports to Israel and to suspend all
arms sales. ·
Publicly condemn the government’s failure to act
decisively in the face of mass killings, forced displacement, deliberate
starvation in Gaza, and continuing violence, land theft, and demolitions in the
West Bank. · Raise concerns about the undue influence exerted by the
Israeli government and its lobbyists on British political and legal
institutions. · Strengthen the Council’s
ethical procurement and investment policies, reaffirming its
commitment to human rights and international law, by ensuring the Council does
not invest in or trade with entities involved in: § state violence, occupation, or repression involving grave
violations of international law, including war crimes, crimes against humanity,
or genocide. § the production of weapons, weapons components, or military
equipment where there is a credible risk of such violations; § the
extraction, processing, or trade of fossil fuels. We
urge the Council to continue standing on the side of justice, human rights, and
international law, and to use its voice to help bring about a just and lasting
peace. [1]
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/mar/18/why-has-israel-resumed-large-scale-airstrikes-on-gaza [2]
https://www.middleeasteye.net/live-blog/live-blog-update/what-gideons-chariots-israels-latest-plan-gaza-0 [3]
https://imemc.org/article/dozens-killed-in-ongoing-israeli-bombing-in-gaza/ [4] https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vb5FMNR1yT27YMJOcw0u Posted Sunday 18th May
2025. Translation: Head of field hospitals at ministry of health to aljazeera:
500 martyrs in gaza strip in last 3 days [5]
https://reliefweb.int/report/occupied-palestinian-territory/humanitarian-situation-update-289-west-bank https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/israel-take-full-control-land-registry-area-c-annexation [6]
https://www.icjpalestine.com/2025/05/08/ground-breaking-report-reveals-evidence-suggesting-uk-is-continuing-to-export-military-goods-to-israel-despite-arms-ban/
https://static1.squarespace.com/static/664aed65d320123f2b3ab647/t/681b13a2197d634a11d746c0/1746604963269/REPORT-ExposingUKArmsExportsToIsrael-05072025.pdf [7] https://www.declassifieduk.org/britain-sent-over-500-spy-flights-to-gaza/ [8]
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/5/23/criminal-complaint-alleges-uk-politicians-complicity-in-israeli-war-crimes
Page
26 [9]
https://www.thenational.scot/news/25165991.labour-see-massive-increase-uk-military-equipment-sent-israel/ [10]
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2025/apr/29/police-and-prosecutors-details-shared-with-israel-during-uk-protests-inquiry-papers-suggest [11]
https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20241018-uk-police-raid-home-of-journalist-exposing-israeli-crimes-and-weaponisation-of-anti-semitism/ [12]
https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2024/01/gaza-icj-ruling-offers-hope-protection-civilians-enduring-apocalyptic
https://www.icj-cij.org/sites/default/files/case-related/192/192-20240126-ord-01-00-en.pdf [13]
https://morningstaronline.co.uk/article/harrowing-gaza-testimonies-describe-children-shot-through-heart-britain-defends-arms [14] https://www.caabu.org/news/press-release/caabu-press-release-new-poll-shows-sustained-british-public-support-immediate https://bylinetimes.com/2024/04/03/brits-want-the-uk-to-ban-arms-sales-to-israel-but-its-political-parties-arent-listening/ [15]
https://www.declassifieduk.org/israel-lobby-funded-a-quarter-of-british-mps/ The Leader replied with the following: ·
Thanked the public speaker for attending the
meeting. ·
The scenes witnessed in the last year and half
in Gaza had had been unbearable. ·
No one, especially children should be left
without food, forced into starvation and no innocent civilian should be killed.
·
The Council had been calling for an immediate
ceasefire in Gaza and across the Middle East for a long time; this was even
more urgent now. ·
Many people in Cambridge had been very deeply
and personally affected by this war. ·
Agreed with the joint statement that was put out
on Monday by the Leaders of the UK, France and Canada which stated: “We strongly oppose the expansion of
Israel’s military operations in Gaza. The level of human suffering in Gaza is
intolerable. Yesterday’s announcement that Israel will allow a basic quantity
of food into Gaza is wholly inadequate. We call on the Israeli Government to
stop its military operations in Gaza and immediately allow humanitarian aid to
enter Gaza. We call on Hamas to release immediately the remaining hostages they
have so cruelly held since 7 October 2023. iv.
The Council passed a Motion calling for an
immediate and permanent ceasefire in Gaza, Israel and the West Bank and for the
suspension of all UK armed sales to Israel. v.
The Council stood by the Motion and reaffirmed
its call. vi.
The Council had, through cross party statements
read out by the Mayor, repeatedly condemned the horrific attack by Hamas on the
7th October and called for an immediate ceasefire, return of the
hostages, unfettered access for humanitarian aid, peace in the Middle East,
international support for a two-state solution and the upholding of
international law. vii.
The Council did not trade with international
entities, suppliers involved in military equipment and did not work with
petrochemical companies. viii.
The Council held high standards of procurement
in line with the Procurement Act and the Modern Slavery Act. ix.
The Council proudly championed human rights,
social justice and equality. Supplementary
Question What is the
Council’s position on the undue influence exerted by the Israeli Government on
British legal and political institutions? And could the Council review its
ethical procedures to ensure it is not complicit in the occupation of
Palestine? The Leader of the
Council responded with the following:
i.
Whilst acknowledging that no foreign government
should have influence on British politics, the Leader is in no position to rule
or form a judgement on that.
ii.
Repeated assurances that the Council did not
trade with international entities, suppliers involved in military equipment and
did not work with petrochemical companies.
iii.
The Council held high standards of procurement
in line with the Procurement Act and the Modern Slavery Act. |
||||||||||
|
To deal with oral questions Minutes: Question 1 Councillor Tong to the Leader The Royal National Institute for Deaf People has reported that more than
50% of people over age 55 will suffer from hearing loss, rising to 80% of
people over the age of 70. As such, it is immensely important that we work to
accommodate these individuals, pushing for local democracy in Cambridge to be
as transparent and open as possible. Visitors to this chamber have reported to
me that, after being invited to tune their hearing aids into an audio induction
loop, they were unable to, harming their ability to take part in the democratic
process. Is this due to a fault, and, if so, is work being done to rectify it? The Cabinet Member responded: In relation to induction loops and hearing
aids in the chamber and in the committee rooms it's important all members of
the public feel they could take part in the democratic process and interact
with the Council. Officers were working with the suppliers of the audiovisual
kit the Council used to ensure all avenues were explored to make sure the
system worked as well as it possibly could so the Council could allow members
of the public to take part in the democratic process. Was aware there were
occasions when the audiovisual kit had technical issues, but the team were
working to keep these to a minimum and the system was regularly tested and
updated to ensure this software was in the best possible condition. Question 2 Councillor Robertson to the Cabinet Member for Finance & Resources Describe the consultation process for Civic Quarter. The Cabinet Member wished to encourage residents, visitors and
stakeholders to respond to the latest consultation on the civic quarter. This
would be live until the 22nd of July. To take part in the events program please register your interest at
cambridge.gov.uk. It was worth taking part because responses to last year's consultation
helped to shape civic quarter design. The Council wanted to hear residents’ voices. A few examples of how the
Council responded were reported to the November 2024 meeting of the Strategy
& Resources Scrutiny Committee:
i.
Opinion was divided on the market canopy and there
was strong support for more seating so with the close involvement of the market
traders current plans show a much smaller canopy over a dedicated seating area.
ii.
There was strong support to retain the seven days a
week market - this council was committed to do just that.
iii.
Calls to reduce antisocial behaviour on the market -
the current plans provide for more permanent stalls which could be secured.
iv.
There was strong support for making the Guildhall
more welcoming and more open to the community. The plans provide for a large
open entrance area with a cafe and other facilities. Question 3 Councillor Dalzell to the Cabinet Member for Planning & Transport With regard to the proposed redevelopment of Arbury Court shopping
centre, and in the context of the broader 'Shaping North Cambridge'
consultation, could the Executive Councillor outline what specific measures are
being taken to ensure that: - local residents' concerns about maintaining essential retail services
during any construction period are being addressed; - the final development will enhance rather than diminish the community
hub function that Arbury Court currently serves; - small independent businesses currently operating in the area will be
protected from unsustainable rent increases following redevelopment?" The Cabinet Member for Housing responded instead of the Cabinet Member
for Planning & Transport. Cambridge City Council was asking local people to feed into the new
framework for change in North Cambridge. It was a long-term plan to guide investment in the area looking at older
council housing estates, green spaces, streets, shops and community facilities
in Arbury, Kings Hedges and Chesterton. No decision had been made and there were no specific proposals for
redevelopment. The Council was starting with the assumption that if there were
to be a future decision to redevelop Arbury Court, the Council would ensure
shops were able to continue trading during any development. Residents were invited to provide feedback on the priorities through the
online survey at any time before the 18th of June they could contact
cambridge.gov.uk/ncf. Hard copy surveys were available Arbury Court Library,
Meadows Community Centre and at all drop-in events. Question 4 Councillor Blackburn Horgan to the Cabinet Member for Finance &
Resources With the council having a local building, 100 Blinco Grove, offered for
purchase from Cambridgeshire County Council, which is set within the community
by schools and families of a growing population, why is it not being purchased
and repurposed as a much-needed youth and community centre to meet the
identified needs of QEW? The Cabinet Member responded the County Council had offered the property
to the City Council on commercial terms. The questioner’s proposal would amount to an out of cycle unfunded
pressure on the capital and revenue budgets. Referred to the current year's
budget making process when 44.9 million pounds of additional income and savings
were identified to balance the budget, in other words to fulfil our strategy
duty. To balance the budget these and other previous savings the councils had
to make have been a direct consequence of 14 years austerity. It was Liberal
Democrats who put this policy in place with the Conservative Government from
2010 to 2015. It was Liberal Democrat ministers who took an active part in the
joint enterprise of austerity. Austerity had brought public services to their
knees and created an infrastructure deficit that would take billions and years
to put right. Perhaps Liberal Democrats in this chamber were now facing up to
the party's role in this? Liberal Democrat County Councillors would be making difficult decisions
to balance the County Council budget. Queried what details relating to this
would appear in Liberal Democrat political leaflets. This was a matter for the County Council not the City Council to answer. Councillor Clough
to the Leader // Cabinet Member for Culture, Economy & Skills The recent ICAEW
survey shows that confidence among small retail businesses has fallen to its
lowest level for two years. What support will the council offer to support
these small businesses that make such a positive contribution to making our
city a special place. The Cabinet Member
responded the spirit of our old city – “In Calculabilis Calculandi Artu
Examinio Wumbo” - the infinite examination of the mysterious art of
accounting and Wumbo. To clarify the acronym was not a Latin word but it
stands for institute of charter accountants in England and Wales so language
should be also accessible to everyone so when asking questions. The Council hugely
values its small businesses and was acutely aware of the challenging
circumstances retail businesses face. The Council works with partners including
the Cambridge and Peterborough Combined Authority and the Cambridge Business
Improvement District to ensure the city was a supportive environment for
growing businesses. Question 6 The Mayor spoke on behalf of Councillor Divkovic to the Cabinet Member
for Climate Action & Environment Is there provision for recycling batteries? The Cabinet Member responded that batteries should not be put in bins.
When they go in the bin lorry and get crushed with other rubbish it could
create a spark and there had been repeated fires in bin lorries. Luckily none
of our fire crews had been harmed but they had to empty out the burning rubbish
onto the road and then put out the fire. This was distressing to waste
operatives and residents. Request people use rechargeable batteries where possible and recharge
with caution using the correct equipment. Residents who owned their own home could make use of a weekly small
household battery collection service. Batteries could be tied in a bag to the
bin handle (green bin, black bin or blue bin). If people lived in a flat or had
communal bins there were plenty of other places to take batteries such as
supermarkets, electrical shops or the City/County Council household recycling
centres. Larger batteries could be taken to electrical recycling points around the
city. Locations were shown on the council website. Question 7 Councillor Tong spoke on behalf of Councillor Howard to the Cabinet
Member for Communities Given the recent changes proposed by the ruling group's colleagues in
national government that many refugees arriving in the UK should NEVER be
eligible for British Citizenship and the inflammatory remarks made by Keir
Starmer - how can this City still claim to be "City of Sanctuary" to
those fleeing conflict, persecution and desperation?" The Cabinet Member responded the question had several elements and in
order to do justice to all of those elements as they could not be answered
effectively in two minutes would focus on answering the substantive part of the
question which was about Cambridge as a city of sanctuary but proposed to work
with officers to add a politically neutral informative that gave clarity to the
question’s preamble around the current and proposed legislative and guidance
framework. The Council had welcomed and supported refugees to rebuild their lives in
Cambridge for over a decade and it's one of the many reasons she was proud to
be a Cambridge City Councillor. The Council had, and would continue to work with, different parties both
locally and nationally to ensure the safe resettlement of people affected by
war into our city of sanctuary. In March this year the Council unanimously approved our resettlement
pledge for 2025 to 2030 continuing our strong commitment to support those
seeking sanctuary and committing a minimum of four council houses per year to
help deliver our resettlement pledge. Over the past five years the Council had supported hundreds of refugees
to rebuild their lives and thrive in our city supporting them to access safe
homes, school places, healthcare, English classes, benefits and employment. The
people of Cambridge had also opened their homes and their hearts to refugees
fleeing war including the war in Ukraine via the Homes for Ukraine scheme. Over £270,000 had been awarded through the Ukraine fund and it was
estimated that every Ukrainian refugee had been able to benefit from around six
projects each. Looking to the future the Council intended to expand that grant
fund enabling communities to support anyone seeking asylum or with refugee
status in the city. The Council would be marking this commitment in June during refugee week
collaborating with Cambridge libraries with a community event. The theme of
refugee week this year would be community was a superpower and the Council
wished to demonstrate the strength of community in Cambridge working with
several local charities such as the Kareem Foundation and the Cambridge Refugee
Resettlement Campaign. Question 8 Councillor McPherson to the Cabinet Member for Culture, Economy &
Skills Could the new CM outline her priorities for year ahead? The Cabinet Member responded that she was excited to champion a
strategic, inclusive and place-based approach to our city's cultural life over
the next year. Her focus would be on delivering real impact across three
pillars:
i.
Growing our creative economy.
ii.
Ensuring access and equity in cultural
participation.
iii.
Embedding culture into the development of place. The Council would continue to deliver the
priorities set out in the cultural strategy while aligning work with broader
council strategies including community wealth building and youth engagement.
This meant supporting neighbourhood projects and landmark events like firework
night and the out of the ordinary festival while expanding access for young
people and marginalized communities. A major priority was navigating the short and long-term implications of
the civic quarter project. The Council would ensure our cultural voice was
heard in the development of the Guild Hall, Corn Exchange, market square and
the surrounding public space. The Council was also finalising a cultural infrastructure strategy that
would guide investment and planning across the city and wider region. This tied
closely with Council involvement in developments like the Leisure Park and
Cambridge Junction where the Council was advocating for culture to be
integrated into how new communities were shaped. The Council was building regional capacity too, establishing a film
office for Cambridge to support creative industry and attract external
investment. The Council was proud to be part of Create Cambridge to ensure
collaborative leadership in the sector. A full list of oral questions including those not asked during the
meeting can be found in the
Information Pack, which is published on the meeting webpage Agenda for Council on Thursday, 22nd May, 2025, 11.00 am -
Cambridge Council |
||||||||||
|
To consider the following notices of motion, notice of which has been given by: |
||||||||||
|
Councillor Tong - Proposed cuts to disability benefits and Access to Work Funding Background The current
Labour government has proposed cuts to disability
benefits (especially Personal Independence Payments) and changes to the Access
to Work funding that could leave Cambridgeshire residents destitute. Further more it is proposed that these cuts will
be put to a vote without waiting for a full report on the impact of the
proposed cuts. The purpose
of this motion is not to draw attention to the cruelty of the proposed cuts.
That is so blindingly obvious that no motion is
required. The purpose
of this motion is to contend that the proposed cuts don’t save money. All they
do is transfer the costs to hard pressed local
services, the NHS and local economies. These cuts
are not just cruelty but stupid cruelty. Active
Motion This
council notes that the disability cut proposals are not just a threat to
disabled residents and their families, although these are quite bad enough.
There are also likely to be wider adverse impacts on our city. These include: · Local health services -one in 7
hospital beds are already occupied by patients who no longer have a medical
need but are trapped in hospital because care is not available · The immediate local economy –
disabled residents spend most of their income in local shops and on local
services · Increased rent arrears among council
tenants · Increased pressure on social
services --the county council has the same statutory responsibilities under the
Care Act 2014 but residents’ ability to contribute to care costs is reduced · Increased pressure on county council
finances -adult social care has to be prioritised by law so funds available for other services
are reduced · Increased use of food banks and food
hubs -75% of food bank visits are from households with one or more disabled
members The council
proposes to write to the ministers concerned, Liz
Kendall and Rachel Reeves and ask local MPs, Daniel
Zeichner and Pippa Heylings to co-sign the letter The
council’s letter will ask for the proposed cuts to be abandoned or at the very
least paused until a full impact assessment can be undertaken. The
council’s letter will also ask whether the proposed cuts will really result in
savings or merely transfer the costs from central government budgets to those
of the NHS, local councils and struggling local economies. Background
Notes Access to Work (“AtW”) 1
The
Access to Work scheme is intended to help people with disabilities or long term health conditions get work and stay in work. Full details of the scheme are here: https://www.gov.uk/access-to-work 2
Critics
of the Access to Work scheme have drawn attention to the long wait for scheme
payments and unexpected refusal of funding The target
time to process new schemes is 4 weeks but the average wait is now 12 weeks, up
from 8 weeks at the 2024 General Election. 3 It is now proposed that the type of equipment that can be funded, the duration of awards, the use of support workers and the pay rate for support ... view the full agenda text for item 25/57/CNL Minutes: Councillor Bennett
proposed and Councillor Tong seconded the following motion: Background The current Labour
government has proposed cuts to disability benefits (especially Personal
Independence Payments) and changes to the Access to Work funding that could
leave Cambridgeshire residents destitute. Furthermore, it is proposed that these cuts will be
put to a vote without waiting for a full report on the impact of the proposed
cuts. The purpose of this motion is not to draw attention to
the cruelty of the proposed cuts. That is so blindingly
obvious that no motion is required. The purpose of this motion is to contend that the
proposed cuts don’t save money. All they do is transfer the costs to
hard-pressed local services, the NHS and local economies. These cuts are not just cruelty but stupid cruelty. Active Motion This council notes that the disability cut proposals
are not just a threat to disabled residents and their families, although these
are quite bad enough. There are also likely to be wider adverse impacts on our
city. These include: ·
Local health services - one in 7 hospital beds are already occupied by patients who no longer have a
medical need but are trapped in hospital because care is not available. ·
The immediate local economy – disabled residents spend
most of their income in local shops and on local services. ·
Increased rent arrears among council tenants. ·
Increased pressure on social services - the county
council has the same statutory responsibilities under the Care Act 2014 but
residents’ ability to contribute to care costs is reduced. ·
Increased pressure on county council finances - adult
social care has to be prioritised
by law so funds available for other services are reduced. ·
Increased use of food banks and food hubs - 75% of
food bank visits are from households with one or more disabled members. The council proposes to write
to the ministers concerned, Liz Kendall and Rachel Reeves
and ask local MPs, Daniel Zeichner and Pippa Heylings to co-sign the letter. The council’s letter will ask for the proposed cuts to
be abandoned or at the very least paused until a full impact assessment can be
undertaken. The council’s letter will also ask whether the
proposed cuts will really result in savings or merely transfer the costs from
central government budgets to those of the NHS, local councils and struggling
local economies. Background Notes Access to Work (“AtW”) 1
The Access to Work scheme is intended to help people
with disabilities or long term health conditions get
work and stay in work. Full details of the scheme are
here: https://www.gov.uk/access-to-work 2
Critics of the Access to Work scheme have drawn
attention to the long wait for scheme payments and unexpected refusal of
funding. The target time to process new schemes is 4 weeks but the average wait
is now 12 weeks, up from 8 weeks at the 2024 General Election. 3
It is now proposed that the type of equipment that can
be funded, the duration of awards, the use of support workers and the pay rate
for support workers will be reduced. 4
It has been claimed that some of these changes have
already been put into practice even though the disability consultation is still
open. 5
It seems clear that the cuts to Access to Work will
make it harder for people to get and keep jobs or achieve self
employment. Personal Independence Payments
(“PIP”) 1
PIP is designed to help with extra living costs if you
have both: a. A
long-term health condition or disability; and b. Difficulty
doing essential everyday tasks or getting around because of that condition 2
PIP is not means tested and 1
in 6 PIP claimants are in paid work. 3
20% of UK residents have a disability or long-term
health condition but only 8% claim PIP 4
PIP is a working age benefit, although 15% of
claimants are over working age. This is because if PIP is awarded before
retirement, entitlement continues afterwards. The increase in pension age has
meant that more people are able to claim. 5
PIP is considered to be a hard to get benefit. The success rate is 52% and the fraud
rate is 0.02 per cent. 6
PIP replaced a previous benefit called Disability
Living Allowance (“DLA”). The transition is still ongoing, and some Cambridge
residents are still on DLA not PIP. 7
Residents who lose out on PIP also lose access to blue
badges, free bus passes, discounted rail travel and carer’s allowance and make
it harder to access other disability services and concessions. 8
Cambridge has one of the lowest rates of PIP claims in
the UK at 4%, compared to 7% for East of England and 8% for the UK. This may
reflect a healthier, more youthful population or simply that many residents are
still on DLA. https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/constituency-data-personal-independence-payment-2 9
However, even in Cambridge, there are 4,300 residents
receiving PIP expected to lose a total of £7.5 million in PIP from the proposed
changes. This is based on 87% of people on standard PIP and 13 % of people on
enhanced PIP losing PIP which is in turn based on FoI figures produced by DWP. https://www.healthequitynorth.co.uk/app/uploads/PIP-REPORT-1.pdf 10
The National Audit Office July 2024 report estimates
that £870 million in PIP goes unclaimed every year.
This Council
believes in the dignity of all people and their right to respect and equality
of opportunity. This Council is a
Disability Confident employer and is committed to recruiting, retaining and
supporting disabled employees. The Council aims to remove barriers, resolve
issues relating to disability and consider individual needs. This includes
taking positive steps towards promoting equality of opportunity, reasonable
adjustments and accommodations, inclusion for all and promoting positive
attitudes towards disabled people. The Government’s
‘Pathways to Work: Reforming Benefits and Support to Get Britain Working’ Green
Paper was published in March, and is out for public
consultation until 30 June. This Council encourages residents to participate in
the public consultation on the Green Paper. This Council
notes that: Cambridge has one
of the lowest rates of PIP claims in the UK at 4%, compared to 7% for the East
of England and 8% for the UK. This Council has
three-year core grant funding agreements with Cambridge & District Citizens
Advice and with Cambridge Ethnic Community Forum to provide independent advice
and advocacy to residents on a range of subjects, including on benefits, as well
as with Cambridge Council for Voluntary Service to provide infrastructure
support to the voluntary and community sector. Across its multi-year grants,
the Council has allocated £466,113 for the year 2025-26. Cambridge &
District Citizens’ Advice (CDCA) statistics show that, for the first half of
2024/25, general help and advice was given on 10,987 issues to 7,950 clients,
and the top issue people were seeking advice for was benefits. The top benefit
issue was PIP. The total income
gains achieved by CDCA for those seeking advice were £2,149,832.00. In the last year,
414 City residents received specialist benefit advice – 54% of these related to
benefit applications. From 1 April to
30 September 2024, the CDCA benefits team completed 21 appeals lodged with the
Courts and Tribunals Service. 20 of the 21 appeals were won. This Council
resolves to: · continue the Council’s strategic partnership work
with Citizens’ Advice and Cambridge Ethnic Community Forum to support residents
to maximise their benefits. · work to ensure that all residents are aware
of the opportunities for support to maximise their benefits, including by
sharing all the relevant information with other stakeholders in the city
including landlords and GP surgeries. · offer all tenants in sheltered accommodation
the opportunity to meet with the Independent Living Service to conduct an
income maximisation check, particularly for tenants who don’t currently access
to Council support services. · submit a response to the Pathways to Work:
Reforming Benefits and Support to Get Britain Working Green Paper. The amendment was
carried by 22 votes to 14. Resolved (by 22 votes to 0 with 14
abstentions) that: This Council
believes in the dignity of all people and their right to respect and equality
of opportunity. This Council is a
Disability Confident employer and is committed to recruiting, retaining and
supporting disabled employees. The Council aims to remove barriers, resolve
issues relating to disability and consider individual needs. This includes
taking positive steps towards promoting equality of opportunity, reasonable
adjustments and accommodations, inclusion for all and promoting positive
attitudes towards disabled people. The Government’s
‘Pathways to Work: Reforming Benefits and Support to Get Britain Working’ Green
Paper was published in March, and is out for public
consultation until 30 June. This Council encourages residents to participate in
the public consultation on the Green Paper. This Council notes
that: Cambridge has one of
the lowest rates of PIP claims in the UK at 4%, compared to 7% for the East of
England and 8% for the UK. This Council has
three-year core grant funding agreements with Cambridge & District Citizens
Advice and with Cambridge Ethnic Community Forum to provide independent advice
and advocacy to residents on a range of subjects, including on benefits, as well
as with Cambridge Council for Voluntary Service to provide infrastructure
support to the voluntary and community sector. Across its multi-year grants,
the Council has allocated £466,113 for the year 2025-26. Cambridge &
District Citizens’ Advice (CDCA) statistics show that, for the first half of
2024/25, general help and advice was given on 10,987 issues to 7,950 clients,
and the top issue people were seeking advice for was benefits. The top benefit
issue was PIP. The total income
gains achieved by CDCA for those seeking advice were £2,149,832.00. In the last year,
414 City residents received specialist benefit advice – 54% of these related to
benefit applications. From 1 April to 30
September 2024, the CDCA benefits team completed 21 appeals lodged with the
Courts and Tribunals Service. 20 of the 21 appeals were won. This Council
resolves to: · continue the Council’s strategic partnership
work with Citizens’ Advice and Cambridge Ethnic Community Forum to support
residents to maximise their benefits. · work to ensure that all residents are aware
of the opportunities for support to maximise their benefits, including by
sharing all the relevant information with other stakeholders in the city
including landlords and GP surgeries. · offer all tenants in sheltered accommodation
the opportunity to meet with the Independent Living Service to conduct an
income maximisation check, particularly for tenants who don’t currently access
to Council support services. · submit a response to the Pathways to Work:
Reforming Benefits and Support to Get Britain Working Green Paper.
|
||||||||||
|
Councillor Martinelli - Housing Associations in Cambridge Council NOTES that: In addition to our own provision of over 7000 council homes
in Cambridge, there are estimated to be over 30 housing associations operating
in the social housing sector in the city, providing a further 6000 homes for
our residents, though not directly the responsibility of this council;
·
Explore the feasibility of convening a written
voluntary code for the recognition of ward city councillors in support of the
resolution of matters that arise from time to time for their tenants ·
Support this by maintenance of up-to-date
records of local properties, appropriate contact details for all Housing
Associations operating in the city and details of customer service access and
internal resolution procedures. ·
Brief all councillors on those situations for
which City Council staff have either an established role in enforcement in
relation to housing association tenancies and a housing advisory role with
their tenants. Minutes: Councillor Martinelli proposed and Councillor Lokhmotova seconded the following motion: Council NOTES that: In addition to our own provision of over 7000 council homes in Cambridge, there are estimated to be over 30 housing associations operating in the social housing sector in the city, providing a further 6000 homes for our residents, though not directly the responsibility of this council;
· Explore the feasibility of convening a written voluntary code for the recognition of ward city councillors in support of the resolution of matters that arise from time to time for their tenants · Support this by maintenance of up-to-date records of local properties, appropriate contact details for all Housing Associations operating in the city and details of customer service access and internal resolution procedures. Brief all councillors on those situations for which City Council staff have either an established role in enforcement in relation to housing association tenancies and a housing advisory role with their tenants. Resolved (by 12 votes to 22) to support the motion so it was lost. |
||||||||||
|
Councillor Simon Smith - Retrofit Dividends Cheaper Heating, Lower Emissions, Healthier Lives This Council notes; Residential homes are responsible for almost 20% of the UK’s carbon emissions mainly through heating, hot water, and electricity. Public sector buildings account for 17% of Cambridge’s emissions, which is a much higher proportion than the UK average of 3% from this emissions source. In 2022, just over half (52%) of properties in England had Band C ratings – above the average for energy efficiency. National Energy Action estimates that 6.1 million UK households are currently in fuel poverty, unable to afford to heat their homes to the temperature needed to keep warm and healthy. LGA research in 2020 estimated that the average cost to councils in pursuing competitive grant-funding was in the region of £30,000 per application. Retrofitting is a form of home improvement that brings homes up to a better standard of thermal efficiency. It can include installing insulation, improving ventilation, water conservation, replacing gas and electric boilers with heat pumps, and adding solar panels and battery storage. Cambridge City Council’s retrofit programme is delivering multiple dividends for people and the planet and economy:
The Council’s retrofit programme comprise the following work streams: 1. Building capacities and skills to get the job done: - Partnership for Government energy efficiency and retrofit funding: The Council has invested in professionals who have in turn built and led the Cambridgeshire Energy Retrofit Partnership (CERP) which as a grant application and delivery vehicle has attracted over £25m in energy efficiency and retrofit programmes. The latest 2023-2025 £8.6m programme retrofitting 494 low energy efficient homes owned by low-income households across the County. - Partnership for Government water retrofit programme: The shared planning service is leading a £5m a programme to reduce water consumption in Council homes across the City and South Cambs - On the supply side, CERP procurement for a pipeline of energy efficiency and retrofit works has enabled contractor to invest in their business and critically apprenticeships and skills across the full range of trades. - On the demand side, the Council has published a ‘how to’ retrofit guide for different housing archetypes for the construction industry and ‘afford to pay’ households which the CPCA is extending and promoting across Cambridgeshire and Peterborough. The 3C Building Control service has launched a building regulations advisory service for applicants retrofitting houses and listed buildings 2. Getting the job done, retrofitting most energy inefficient Council homes - Council home retrofit comprising external wall insulation, improved ventilation in wet rooms, door undercuts and ... view the full agenda text for item 25/59/CNL Minutes: Under Council Procedure Rule 26.1, with the consent of Council,
Councillor Moore proposed and Councillor Smith
seconded the following altered motion: This council notes; Residential homes are responsible for almost 20% of the UK’s carbon
emissions mainly through heating, hot water, and electricity. Public sector buildings account for 17% of Cambridge’s emissions, which
is a much higher proportion than the UK average of 3% from this emissions
source. In 2022, just over half (52%) of properties in England had Band C
ratings – above the average for energy efficiency. National Energy Action estimates that 6.1 million UK households are
currently in fuel poverty, unable to afford to heat their homes to the
temperature needed to keep warm and healthy. LGA research in 2020 estimated that the average cost to councils in
pursuing competitive grant-funding was in the region of £30,000 per
application. Retrofitting is a form of home improvement that brings homes up to a
better standard of thermal and energy efficiency. It can include installing
insulation, improving ventilation, water conservation, replacing gas and other
fossil fuel heating systems with heat pumps, and adding solar PV panels and
battery storage. Cambridge City Council’s retrofit programme is delivering multiple
dividends for people and the planet and economy:
The work that is going on across the city and wider areas is synonymous
with the campaign – ‘RetroFit for the Future.’ Fuel
Poverty Action, ACORN, Greener Jobs Alliance, Medact
and the Peace & Justice Project have teamed up to push for three key
interventions in the retrofit debate: a. A workforce skills plan b. Protecting private renters c. Accountability for retrofit work The Council’s retrofit programme comprises the following work streams: 1. Building capacities and skills to get the job done: -
Partnership for Government energy efficiency and retrofit funding: The
Council has invested in professionals who have in turn built and led the
Cambridgeshire Energy Retrofit Partnership (CERP) which as a grant application
and delivery vehicle has attracted over £25m in energy efficiency and retrofit
programmes. The latest 2023-2025 £8.6m programme retrofitting 494 low energy
efficient homes owned by low-income households across the County. This
equated to an estimated 490 tonnes of CO2 saving. This was achieved through a
combination of government grant funding and funding awarded by CPCA. -
Partnership for Government water retrofit programme: The shared planning
service is leading a £5m a programme to reduce water consumption in Council
homes across the City and South Cambridgeshire -
On the supply side, CERP procurement for a pipeline of energy efficiency
and retrofit works has enabled contractors to invest in their business and
critically apprenticeships and skills across the full range of trades. -
On the demand side, the Council has published a ‘how to’ retrofit guide
for different housing archetypes for the construction industry and
‘able/willing to pay’ households which the CPCA is extending and promoting
across Cambridgeshire and Peterborough. The newly developed guide will
highlight homes which are “heat pump ready.” -
The 3C Building Control service has launched a building regulations
advisory service for applicants retrofitting houses and listed buildings -
To encourage retrofit at scale and pace, some of the wider work of
Cambridge City Council include collaborating on a research piece with the
Cambridge Institute of Sustainability Leaders, which is expected to be released
in the Summer: “RetroFit For
Future: Scaling building decarbonisation across Greater Cambridge. The aim of
this piece will be to identify and detail an array of practical levers for us
to encourage retrofit and the co-benefits, such as supporting the increase of
green skills, supporting the growth of the local economy, and developing access
to finance mechanisms for those that don’t meet grant criteria. -
City Council has created a new “Energy and Retrofit” team which has
pulled together colleagues and expertise from across the organisation who work
on energy and retrofit across our council owned homes, private housing and our
own corporate, commercial and community properties into a new centre of
excellence. The team will seek funding and partnership opportunities to support
and deliver our commitments to decarbonise homes and businesses across
Cambridge with an invigorated streamlined approach. -
CERP are currently seeking endorsement to create a retrofit strategy for
Cambridgeshire and Peterborough. With no national strategy in place to look at
retrofit holistically there is a requirement to support local economy, market
capacity and upskilling and leverage of private finance – a clear strategic
local approach and long-term vision for delivery is important to ensure these
can be reconciled. 2. Getting the job done, retrofitting most energy inefficient Council
homes
-
We have two principal projects underway. Using a mix of our own funds
and central government grants we have so far retrofitted 225 homes to EPC C
standard. We have recently received funding for a further 370 council homes over the next two years with support from the
Social Housing Decarbonisation Fund Wave 2.1 (£2.26m) and the Warm Homes Social
Housing Fund Wave 3 and a further 130 properties in 2027/28. The funding
focuses on external wall insulation, ventilation through extractor fans and
indoor air quality, but general improvements such replacing windows and doors
when they are near to end of life and top-up loft insulation to 300mm are
incorporated as much as possible. -
More than half of all heat loss from these homes is through uninsulated
solid brick walls and about sixth is lost through the floor and roof. The
retrofit measures involve: ·
adding insulation to the external walls, floor and roofs to reduce heat
loss in winter and heat gain in summer. ·
replacing gas boilers and fossil fuel systems with clean heat
solutions such as air source heat pumps, which typically produce about
three times as much energy as they use. ·
installing new mechanical ventilation with heat recovery (MVHR) systems.
These will replace stale, moist air with fresh, filtered air and reduce heat
loss. It also reduces humidity and the risk of condensation and mould. ·
installing photovoltaic (PV) solar panels to the roofs, to provide
electricity for the homes. This will contribute to the running of the heat
pumps and MVHR systems. It will also enable qualifying tenants to claim Smart Export Guarantee payments. ·
upgrading to triple-glazed windows and composite external doors to
reduce heat loss, draughts and condensation. It will also provide better
insulation against external noise. ·
Investing in the Grade II listed Guildhall so that it will be net zero
carbon in operation 3. Retrofitting private sector homes
-
Cambridge City Council acts as Lead Authority delivering
government-funded capital retrofit programmes across Cambridgeshire – operating
as a partnership between all the Cambridgeshire authorities including
Peterborough City Council and CPCA. Having successfully delivered over
£9m of energy efficiency and clean heat measures through the Home Upgrade Grant
2, we have recently secured a further £8.5m from the Warm Homes: Local Grant to
continue delivery for the next 3 years. These grants are designed to support
low income, fuel poor households who live in the most inefficient, poorly
performing homes. -
In partnership with the CPCA, the City council
was awarded a further £950,000 to complete retrofit upgrades across the County. -
Cambridge City Council also participates in the Energy Company
Obligation (ECO 4) administered by Ofgem, which focusses on supporting
low-income, vulnerable and fuel poor households through installation of
insulation and heating measures. -
The Cambridgeshire Energy Retrofit Partnership (CERP) operating under
the brand of ‘Action on Energy,’ provides communities with advice on how to
maximise energy efficiency within homes, save money on energy bills, cut carbon
emissions and support to find accredited installers. -
The contractor’s framework agreement for the provision of energy
efficiency works is also accessible to residents across Cambridgeshire, helping
homeowners who are able or willing to pay for measures to navigate the market
for suppliers and find accredited contractors to do retrofit work. -
With the framework in place, we have been able to develop the social
benefits of the retrofit work. Contractors are offering their skills,
volunteering and funding projects through “Match my Project.” This process is
demonstrating strong community value in the stimulation of the retrofit market. 4. Retrofitting non-domestic building stock -
This council has set itself an ambitious target to achieve net-zero
energy use by 2030 for council properties where we control the energy supply.
This includes properties we occupy or manage, like community centres, as well
as common areas in housing or commercial buildings we own and operate. -
In 2023, we completed a £1.7mn project (funded by Public Sector
Decarbonisation Fund) to retrofit Parkside and Abbey Pools, installing air
source heat pumps and energy efficiency upgrades. -
We have recently won Salix funding for decarbonization measures for the
crematorium, Brown's Field Community Centre and Trumpington Pavillion -
including systems controls, insulation, lighting replacement and solar panel
installation. -
We are developing proposals for a district heat network with the University
of Cambridge, city centre Colleges and Anglia Ruskin University. The aim is to
create a renewable heat network in the city by 2030 to supply renewable heat
and hot water around the city centre to help decarbonize buildings. This
project is currently in the detailed design and business case development
phase. -
The Civic Quarter redevelopment will upgrade the Guildhall and
Corn Exchange. We are aiming for exemplar project outcomes, targeting, water
neutrality and a Biodiversity Net Gain of 20% across the Civic Quarter and
Operational Net Zero for the Guildhall. The design work to date includes
consideration of fabric upgrades and alignment with ENERPHIT and LETI
standards, introduction of water saving measures, PV panels and enabling a
future connection to the proposed city centre District Heating Network
This Council will ask the leader to write to the Secretary of State for
Energy Security and Net Zero, Ed Milliband, and the
Chancellor, Rachel Reeves, to: 1. Note the nation’s housing stock accounts for almost 20% of the UK’s
carbon emissions and is so energy inefficient that over 6m households are in
fuel poverty, unable to afford to heat their homes to the temperature needed to
keep warm and healthy. 2. Note that without increasing investment to acceleratie
retrofit, the UK is missing out on multiple dividends for people, the planet
and economy as retrofit: ·
Responds to the cost-of-living crisis through lower energy bills ·
Mitigates climate change through lower fossil fuel emissions ·
Adapts to climate change by keeping homes cooler during more frequent
and extreme heatwaves ·
Improves quality of life through consistent and comfortable indoor
temperature throughout the year, ·
Improves public health and productive health life expectancy with better
ventilation and indoor air quality protecting residents from damp, condensation
and mould associated asthma and bronchial illnesses. ·
Creates conditions for new labour-intensive businesses to grow, build
the skilled workforces and finance products needed to scale-up retrofit across
the UK. 3. Request Government to give local government confidence to plan for
large scale retrofit programmes and their contractors and firms in supply
chains to invest in apprenticeships and skills training by: i) Replacing the previous Government’s grant making regimes with one that
is: ·
consistent and long term (instead of intermittent and short term), ·
allocated against deliverable programmes (in place of wasteful
competitive bidding) and ·
flexible (in place of hard to meet ring fenced eligibility criteria) ii) Incentivising employers to invest in workforce skills recruitment
and development as a well-trained workforce is essential for delivering an
effective, sustainable retrofit programme. iii) Requiring independent regulation of retrofit work with quality
assurance standards alongside robust monitoring and measurement of
effectiveness and value of retrofit dividends. iv) Facilitating investment across all tenures from registered
providers, afford to pay owner occupiers and private rented sector. 4. Request Government to require in the forthcoming Future Homes
Standard to require installation of solar panels, set higher ventilation and
building fabric standards and progress approaches to reducing embodied carbon
in new buildings, noting that because the last Government scrapped Labour’s
zero-carbon home standard, 1.35m homes built since 2016 will have to be
retrofitted at a cost of up to £2bn. Councillor Dalzell proposed and Councillor Porrer seconded the following
amendment to motion (deleted text This council notes; Residential homes are responsible for almost 20% of the UK’s carbon
emissions mainly through heating, hot water, and electricity. Public sector buildings account for 17% of Cambridge’s emissions, which
is a much higher proportion than the UK average of 3% from this emissions
source. In 2022, just over half (52%) of properties in England had Band C
ratings – above the average for energy efficiency. National Energy Action estimates that 6.1 million UK households are
currently in fuel poverty, unable to afford to heat their homes to the
temperature needed to keep warm and healthy. LGA research in 2020 estimated that the average cost to councils in
pursuing competitive grant-funding was in the region of £30,000 per
application. Retrofitting is a form of home improvement that brings homes up to a
better standard of thermal and energy efficiency. It can include installing
insulation, improving ventilation, water conservation, replacing gas and other
fossil fuel heating systems with heat pumps, and adding solar PV panels and
battery storage. Cambridge City Council’s retrofit programme is delivering multiple
dividends for people and the planet and economy:
The work that is going on across the city and wider areas is synonymous
with the campaign – ‘RetroFit for the Future.’ Fuel
Poverty Action, ACORN, Greener Jobs Alliance, Medact
and the Peace & Justice Project have teamed up to push for three key
interventions in the retrofit debate: a. A workforce skills plan b. Protecting private renters c. Accountability for retrofit work The Council’s retrofit programme comprises the following work streams: 1. Building capacities and skills to get the job done: -
Partnership for Government energy efficiency and retrofit funding: The
Council has invested in professionals who have in turn built and led the Cambridgeshire
Energy Retrofit Partnership (CERP) which as a grant application and delivery
vehicle has attracted over £25m in energy efficiency and retrofit programmes.
The latest 2023-2025 £8.6m programme retrofitting 494 low energy efficient
homes owned by low-income households across the County. This equated to an
estimated 490 tonnes of CO2 saving. This was achieved through a combination of
government grant funding and funding awarded by CPCA. -
Partnership for Government water retrofit programme: The shared planning
service is leading a £5m a programme to reduce water consumption in Council
homes across the City and South Cambridgeshire -
On the supply side, CERP procurement for a pipeline of energy efficiency
and retrofit works has enabled contractors to invest in their business and
critically apprenticeships and skills across the full range of trades. -
On the demand side, the Council has published a ‘how to’ retrofit guide
for different housing archetypes for the construction industry and
‘able/willing to pay’ households which the CPCA is extending and promoting
across Cambridgeshire and Peterborough. The newly developed guide will
highlight homes which are “heat pump ready.” -
The 3C Building Control service has launched a building regulations
advisory service for applicants retrofitting houses and listed buildings -
To encourage retrofit at scale and pace, some of the wider work of
Cambridge City Council include collaborating on a research piece with the
Cambridge Institute of Sustainability Leaders, which is expected to be released
in the Summer: “RetroFit For
Future: Scaling building decarbonisation across Greater Cambridge. The aim of
this piece will be to identify and detail an array of practical levers for us
to encourage retrofit and the co-benefits, such as supporting the increase of
green skills, supporting the growth of the local economy, and developing access
to finance mechanisms for those that don’t meet grant criteria. -
City Council has created a new “Energy and Retrofit” team which has
pulled together colleagues and expertise from across the organisation who work
on energy and retrofit across our council owned homes, private housing and our
own corporate, commercial and community properties into a new centre of
excellence. The team will seek funding and partnership opportunities to support
and deliver our commitments to decarbonise homes and businesses across
Cambridge with an invigorated streamlined approach. -
CERP are currently seeking endorsement to create a retrofit strategy for
Cambridgeshire and Peterborough. With no national strategy in place to look at
retrofit holistically there is a requirement to support local economy, market
capacity and upskilling and leverage of private finance – a clear strategic
local approach and long-term vision for delivery is important to ensure these
can be reconciled. 2. Getting the job done, retrofitting most energy inefficient Council
homes -
We have two principal projects underway. Using a mix of our own funds
and central government grants we have so far retrofitted 225 homes to EPC C
standard. We have recently received funding for a further 370 council homes
over the next two years with support from the Social Housing Decarbonisation
Fund Wave 2.1 (£2.26m) and the Warm Homes Social Housing Fund Wave 3 and a
further 130 properties in 2027/28. The funding focuses on external wall insulation,
ventilation through extractor fans and indoor air quality, but general
improvements such replacing windows and doors when they are near to end of life
and top-up loft insulation to 300mm are incorporated as much as possible. -
The second project is a net-zero home pilot on Ross Street and Coldhams Grove investing up to £5m to retrofit fully 50
homes to net zero carbon standards. Monitoring and evaluating results are key
to this project to inform future retrofit projects and outcomes. More than half of all heat loss from these homes is through uninsulated
solid brick walls and about sixth is lost through the floor and roof. The
retrofit measures involve: ·
adding insulation to the external walls, floor and roofs to reduce heat
loss in winter and heat gain in summer. ·
replacing gas boilers and fossil fuel systems with clean heat solutions
such as air source heat pumps, which typically produce about three times as
much energy as they use. ·
installing new mechanical ventilation with heat recovery (MVHR) systems.
These will replace stale, moist air with fresh, filtered air and reduce heat
loss. It also reduces humidity and the risk of condensation and mould. ·
installing photovoltaic (PV) solar panels to the roofs, to provide
electricity for the homes. This will contribute to the running of the heat
pumps and MVHR systems. It will also enable qualifying tenants to claim Smart Export Guarantee payments. ·
upgrading to triple-glazed windows and composite external doors to
reduce heat loss, draughts and condensation. It will also provide better
insulation against external noise. ·
Investing in the Grade II listed Guildhall so that it will be net zero
carbon in operation 3. Retrofitting private sector homes -
Cambridge City Council acts as Lead Authority delivering
government-funded capital retrofit programmes across Cambridgeshire – operating
as a partnership between all the Cambridgeshire authorities including
Peterborough City Council and CPCA. Having successfully delivered over
£9m of energy efficiency and clean heat measures through the Home Upgrade Grant
2, we have recently secured a further £8.5m from the Warm Homes: Local Grant to
continue delivery for the next 3 years. These grants are designed to support
low income, fuel poor households who live in the most inefficient, poorly
performing homes. -
In partnership with the CPCA, the City council
was awarded a further £950,000 to complete retrofit upgrades across the County. -
Cambridge City Council also participates in the Energy Company
Obligation (ECO 4) administered by Ofgem, which focusses on supporting
low-income, vulnerable and fuel poor households through installation of
insulation and heating measures. -
The Cambridgeshire Energy Retrofit Partnership (CERP) operating under
the brand of ‘Action on Energy,’ provides communities with advice on how to
maximise energy efficiency within homes, save money on energy bills, cut carbon
emissions and support to find accredited installers. -
The contractor’s framework agreement for the provision of energy
efficiency works is also accessible to residents across Cambridgeshire, helping
homeowners who are able or willing to pay for measures to navigate the market
for suppliers and find accredited contractors to do retrofit work. -
With the framework in place, we have been able to develop the social
benefits of the retrofit work. Contractors are offering their skills,
volunteering and funding projects through “Match my Project.” This process is
demonstrating strong community value in the stimulation of the retrofit market. 4. Retrofitting non-domestic building stock -
This council has set itself an ambitious target to achieve net-zero
energy use by 2030 for council properties where we control the energy supply.
This includes properties we occupy or manage, like community centres, as well
as common areas in housing or commercial buildings we own and operate. -
In 2023, we completed a £1.7mn project (funded by Public Sector
Decarbonisation Fund) to retrofit Parkside and Abbey Pools, installing air
source heat pumps and energy efficiency upgrades. -
We have recently won Salix funding for decarbonization measures for the
crematorium, Brown's Field Community Centre and Trumpington Pavillion -
including systems controls, insulation, lighting replacement and solar panel
installation. -
We are developing proposals for a district heat network with the
University of Cambridge, city centre Colleges and Anglia Ruskin University. The
aim is to create a renewable heat network in the city by 2030 to supply
renewable heat and hot water around the city centre to help decarbonize
buildings. This project is currently in the detailed design and business case
development phase. -
The Civic Quarter redevelopment will upgrade the Guildhall and
Corn Exchange. We are aiming for exemplar project outcomes, targeting, water
neutrality and a Biodiversity Net Gain of 20% across the Civic Quarter and
Operational Net Zero for the Guildhall. The design work to date includes
consideration of fabric upgrades and alignment with ENERPHIT and LETI
standards, introduction of water saving measures, PV panels and enabling a
future connection to the proposed city centre District Heating Network This Council will ask the leader to write to the Secretary of State for
Energy Security and Net Zero, Ed Milliband, and the
Chancellor, Rachel Reeves, to: 1. Note the nation’s housing stock accounts for almost 20% of the UK’s
carbon emissions and is so energy inefficient that over 6m households are in
fuel poverty, unable to afford to heat their homes to the temperature needed to
keep warm and healthy. 2. Note that without increasing investment to acceleratie
retrofit, the UK is missing out on multiple dividends for people, the planet
and economy as retrofit: ·
Responds to the cost-of-living crisis through lower energy bills ·
Mitigates climate change through lower fossil fuel emissions ·
Adapts to climate change by keeping homes cooler during more frequent
and extreme heatwaves ·
Improves quality of life through consistent and comfortable indoor
temperature throughout the year, ·
Improves public health and productive health life expectancy with better
ventilation and indoor air quality protecting residents from damp, condensation
and mould associated asthma and bronchial illnesses. ·
Creates conditions for new labour-intensive businesses to grow, build
the skilled workforces and finance products needed to scale-up retrofit across
the UK. 3. Request Government to give local government confidence to plan for
large scale retrofit programmes and their contractors and firms in supply
chains to invest in apprenticeships and skills training by: i) Replacing the previous Government’s grant making regimes with one that
is: ·
consistent and long term (instead of intermittent and short term), ·
allocated against deliverable programmes (in place of wasteful
competitive bidding) and ·
flexible (in place of hard to meet ring fenced eligibility criteria) ii) Incentivising employers to invest in workforce skills recruitment
and development as a well-trained workforce is essential for delivering an
effective, sustainable retrofit programme. iii) Requiring independent regulation of retrofit work with quality
assurance standards alongside robust monitoring and measurement of
effectiveness and value of retrofit dividends. iv) Facilitating investment across all tenures from registered
providers, afford to pay owner occupiers and private rented sector. 4. Request Government to require in the forthcoming Future Homes
Standard to require installation of solar panels, set higher ventilation and
building fabric standards and progress approaches to reducing embodied
carbon in new buildings, noting that because the last Government scrapped
Labour’s zero-carbon home standard, 1.35m homes built since 2016 will have to
be retrofitted at a cost of up to £2bn.
Further more: This Council further notes that: 1. Despite the valuable work underway locally, Cambridge's retrofit
program could be significantly accelerated with proper support from central
government. 2. The council's own Housing Revenue Account Budget Setting Report
acknowledges that the current target of 2035 for bringing all homes to EPC 'C'
standard is five years behind the government's 2030 requirement, potentially
requiring £20 million in additional borrowing without committed government
funding. 3. The Labour government's recent 2025 budget failed to deliver the
promised Green Prosperity Plan in full, reducing the scale of investment
originally pledged during the election campaign that could have helped meet
this accelerated timeline. 4. The competitive bidding process for retrofit funding wastes an
estimated £30,000 per application (as noted in the LGA research cited in the
motion), resources that could be better spent directly on improving homes. Therefore, this Council additionally resolves to: 1. Develop a more ambitious retrofit target that aims to upgrade 100% of
all council-owned properties to EPC Band C or above by 2030, establishing
Cambridge as a national leader in housing energy efficiency. 2. Create a Cambridge Retrofit Partnership between the Council, local
businesses, and community organizations to pool resources and expertise. 3. Establish a dedicated advice service that supports both private
renters and landlords - helping tenants understand their rights regarding
minimum energy efficiency standards and offering support for enforcement action
when needed, while also providing landlords with practical guidance on
compliance pathways and available funding options. 4. Call on the government to reinstate the full funding originally
promised in the Green Prosperity Plan and to introduce a specific funding
stream for both social housing providers and private landlords in historic
cities like Cambridge, where retrofit solutions often need to accommodate
conservation requirements. The amendment was lost 9 votes to 19 with 2 abstentions. Councillor Clough proposed and Councillor Tong seconded the following
amendment to motion (deleted text This council notes; Residential homes are responsible for almost 20% of the UK’s carbon
emissions mainly through heating, hot water, and electricity. Public sector buildings account for 17% of Cambridge’s emissions, which
is a much higher proportion than the UK average of 3% from this emissions
source. In 2022, just over half (52%) of properties in England had Band C
ratings – above the average for energy efficiency. National Energy Action estimates that 6.1 million UK households are
currently in fuel poverty, unable to afford to heat their homes to the
temperature needed to keep warm and healthy. LGA research in 2020 estimated that the average cost to councils in
pursuing competitive grant-funding was in the region of £30,000 per
application. Retrofitting is a form of home improvement that brings homes up to a
better standard of thermal and energy efficiency. It can include installing
insulation, improving ventilation, water conservation, replacing gas and other
fossil fuel heating systems with heat pumps, and adding solar PV panels and
battery storage. Cambridge City Council’s retrofit programme is delivering multiple
dividends for people and the planet and economy:
The work that is going on across the city and wider areas is synonymous
with the campaign – ‘RetroFit for the Future.’ Fuel
Poverty Action, ACORN, Greener Jobs Alliance, Medact
and the Peace & Justice Project have teamed up to push for three key
interventions in the retrofit debate: a. A workforce skills plan b. Protecting private renters c. Accountability for retrofit work The Council’s retrofit programme comprises the following work streams: 1. Building capacities and skills to get the job done: -
Partnership for Government energy efficiency and retrofit funding: The
Council has invested in professionals who have in turn built and led the
Cambridgeshire Energy Retrofit Partnership (CERP) which as a grant application
and delivery vehicle has attracted over £25m in energy efficiency and retrofit
programmes. The latest 2023-2025 £8.6m programme retrofitting 494 low energy
efficient homes owned by low-income households across the County. This equated
to an estimated 490 tonnes of CO2 saving. This was achieved through a
combination of government grant funding and funding awarded by CPCA. -
Partnership for Government water retrofit programme: The shared planning
service is leading a £5m a programme to reduce water consumption in Council
homes across the City and South Cambridgeshire -
On the supply side, CERP procurement for a pipeline of energy efficiency
and retrofit works has enabled contractors to invest in their business and
critically apprenticeships and skills across the full range of trades. -
On the demand side, the Council has published a ‘how to’ retrofit guide
for different housing archetypes for the construction industry and
‘able/willing to pay’ households which the CPCA is extending and promoting
across Cambridgeshire and Peterborough. The newly developed guide will
highlight homes which are “heat pump ready.” -
The 3C Building Control service has launched a building regulations
advisory service for applicants retrofitting houses and listed buildings -
To encourage retrofit at scale and pace, some of the wider work of
Cambridge City Council include collaborating on a research piece with the
Cambridge Institute of Sustainability Leaders, which is expected to be released
in the Summer: “RetroFit For
Future: Scaling building decarbonisation across Greater Cambridge. The aim of
this piece will be to identify and detail an array of practical levers for us
to encourage retrofit and the co-benefits, such as supporting the increase of
green skills, supporting the growth of the local economy, and developing access
to finance mechanisms for those that don’t meet grant criteria. -
City Council has created a new “Energy and Retrofit” team which has
pulled together colleagues and expertise from across the organisation who work
on energy and retrofit across our council owned homes, private housing and our
own corporate, commercial and community properties into a new centre of
excellence. The team will seek funding and partnership opportunities to support
and deliver our commitments to decarbonise homes and businesses across
Cambridge with an invigorated streamlined approach. -
CERP are currently seeking endorsement to create a retrofit strategy for
Cambridgeshire and Peterborough. With no national strategy in place to look at
retrofit holistically there is a requirement to support local economy, market
capacity and upskilling and leverage of private finance – a clear strategic
local approach and long-term vision for delivery is important to ensure these
can be reconciled. 2. Getting the job done, retrofitting most energy inefficient Council
homes -
We have two principal projects underway. Using a mix of our own funds
and central government grants we have so far retrofitted 225 homes to EPC C
standard. We have recently received funding for a further 370 council homes
over the next two years with support from the Social Housing Decarbonisation
Fund Wave 2.1 (£2.26m) and the Warm Homes Social Housing Fund Wave 3 and a
further 130 properties in 2027/28. The funding focuses on external wall insulation,
ventilation through extractor fans and indoor air quality, but general
improvements such replacing windows and doors when they are near to end of life
and top-up loft insulation to 300mm are incorporated as much as possible. -
The second project is a net-zero home pilot on Ross Street and Coldhams Grove investing up to £5m to retrofit fully 50
homes to net zero carbon standards. Monitoring and evaluating results are key
to this project to inform future retrofit projects and outcomes. More than half of all heat loss from these homes is through uninsulated
solid brick walls and about sixth is lost through the floor and roof. The
retrofit measures involve: ·
adding insulation to the external walls, floor and roofs to reduce heat
loss in winter and heat gain in summer. ·
replacing gas boilers and fossil fuel systems with clean heat solutions
such as air source heat pumps, which typically produce about three times as
much energy as they use. ·
installing new mechanical ventilation with heat recovery (MVHR) systems.
These will replace stale, moist air with fresh, filtered air and reduce heat
loss. It also reduces humidity and the risk of condensation and mould. ·
installing photovoltaic (PV) solar panels to the roofs, to provide
electricity for the homes. This will contribute to the running of the heat
pumps and MVHR systems. It will also enable qualifying tenants to claim Smart Export Guarantee payments. ·
upgrading to triple-glazed windows and composite external doors to
reduce heat loss, draughts and condensation. It will also provide better
insulation against external noise. ·
Investing in the Grade II listed Guildhall so that it will be net zero
carbon in operation 3. Retrofitting private sector homes -
Cambridge City Council acts as Lead Authority delivering
government-funded capital retrofit programmes across Cambridgeshire – operating
as a partnership between all the Cambridgeshire authorities including
Peterborough City Council and CPCA. Having successfully delivered over
£9m of energy efficiency and clean heat measures through the Home Upgrade Grant
2, we have recently secured a further £8.5m from the Warm Homes: Local Grant to
continue delivery for the next 3 years. These grants are designed to support
low income, fuel poor households who live in the most inefficient, poorly
performing homes. -
In partnership with the CPCA, the City council
was awarded a further £950,000 to complete retrofit upgrades across the County. -
Cambridge City Council also participates in the Energy Company
Obligation (ECO 4) administered by Ofgem, which focusses on supporting
low-income, vulnerable and fuel poor households through installation of
insulation and heating measures. -
The Cambridgeshire Energy Retrofit Partnership (CERP) operating under
the brand of ‘Action on Energy,’ provides communities with advice on how to
maximise energy efficiency within homes, save money on energy bills, cut carbon
emissions and support to find accredited installers. -
The contractor’s framework agreement for the provision of energy
efficiency works is also accessible to residents across Cambridgeshire, helping
homeowners who are able or willing to pay for measures to navigate the market
for suppliers and find accredited contractors to do retrofit work. -
With the framework in place, we have been able to develop the social
benefits of the retrofit work. Contractors are offering their skills,
volunteering and funding projects through “Match my Project.” This process is
demonstrating strong community value in the stimulation of the retrofit market. 4. Retrofitting non-domestic building stock -
This council has set itself an ambitious target to achieve net-zero
energy use by 2030 for council properties where we control the energy supply.
This includes properties we occupy or manage, like community centres, as well
as common areas in housing or commercial buildings we own and operate. -
In 2023, we completed a £1.7mn project (funded by Public Sector
Decarbonisation Fund) to retrofit Parkside and Abbey Pools, installing air
source heat pumps and energy efficiency upgrades. -
We have recently won Salix funding for decarbonization measures for the
crematorium, Brown's Field Community Centre and Trumpington Pavillion -
including systems controls, insulation, lighting replacement and solar panel
installation. -
We are developing proposals for a district heat network with the
University of Cambridge, city centre Colleges and Anglia Ruskin University. The
aim is to create a renewable heat network in the city by 2030 to supply
renewable heat and hot water around the city centre to help decarbonize
buildings. This project is currently in the detailed design and business case
development phase. This Council believes that social justice and
climate justice are inextricably linked. In the current cost of living crisis
and given the limited availability of funding and skilled workers, the Council
is minded to use its funds to prioritise partial
retrofit to low income residents’ homes so that the
benefits can be shared as fairly as possible. This is
exemplified by the Ditton Fields scheme. This Council will ask the leader to write to the Secretary of State for
Energy Security and Net Zero, Ed Milliband, and the
Chancellor, Rachel Reeves, to: 1. Note the nation’s housing stock accounts for almost 20% of the UK’s
carbon emissions and is so energy inefficient that over 6m households are in
fuel poverty, unable to afford to heat their homes to the temperature needed to
keep warm and healthy. 2. Note that without increasing investment to acceleratie
retrofit, the UK is missing out on multiple dividends for people, the planet
and economy as retrofit: ·
Responds to the cost-of-living crisis through lower energy bills ·
Mitigates climate change through lower fossil fuel emissions ·
Adapts to climate change by keeping homes cooler during more frequent
and extreme heatwaves ·
Improves quality of life through consistent and comfortable indoor
temperature throughout the year, ·
Improves public health and productive health life expectancy with better
ventilation and indoor air quality protecting residents from damp, condensation
and mould associated asthma and bronchial illnesses. ·
Creates conditions for new labour-intensive businesses to grow, build
the skilled workforces and finance products needed to scale-up retrofit across
the UK. 3. Request Government to give local government confidence to plan for
large scale retrofit programmes and their contractors and firms in supply
chains to invest in apprenticeships and skills training by: i) Replacing the previous Government’s grant making regimes with one that
is: ·
consistent and long term (instead of intermittent and short term), ·
allocated against deliverable programmes (in place of wasteful
competitive bidding) and ·
flexible (in place of hard to meet ring fenced eligibility criteria) ii) Incentivising employers to invest in workforce skills recruitment
and development as a well-trained workforce is essential for delivering an
effective, sustainable retrofit programme. iii) Requiring independent regulation of retrofit work with quality
assurance standards alongside robust monitoring and measurement of
effectiveness and value of retrofit dividends. iv) Facilitating investment across all tenures from registered
providers, afford to pay owner occupiers and private rented sector. 4. Request Government to require in the forthcoming Future Homes
Standard to require installation of solar panels, set higher ventilation and
building fabric standards and progress approaches to reducing embodied
carbon in new buildings, noting that because the last Government scrapped
Labour’s zero-carbon home standard, 1.35m homes built since 2016 will have to
be retrofitted at a cost of up to £2bn.
The amendment was lost by 5 votes to 26. Resolved (by 26 votes to 0 with 5 abstentions)
that: This council notes; Residential homes are responsible for almost 20% of the UK’s carbon
emissions mainly through heating, hot water, and electricity. Public sector buildings account for 17% of Cambridge’s emissions, which
is a much higher proportion than the UK average of 3% from this emissions
source. In 2022, just over half (52%) of properties in England had Band C
ratings – above the average for energy efficiency. National Energy Action estimates that 6.1 million UK households are
currently in fuel poverty, unable to afford to heat their homes to the
temperature needed to keep warm and healthy. LGA research in 2020 estimated that the average cost to councils in pursuing
competitive grant-funding was in the region of £30,000 per application. Retrofitting is a form of home improvement that brings homes up to a
better standard of thermal and energy efficiency. It can include installing
insulation, improving ventilation, water conservation, replacing gas and other
fossil fuel heating systems with heat pumps, and adding solar PV panels and
battery storage. Cambridge City Council’s retrofit programme is delivering multiple
dividends for people and the planet and economy:
The work that is going on across the city and wider areas is synonymous
with the campaign – ‘RetroFit for the Future.’ Fuel
Poverty Action, ACORN, Greener Jobs Alliance, Medact
and the Peace & Justice Project have teamed up to push for three key
interventions in the retrofit debate: a. A workforce skills plan b. Protecting private renters c. Accountability for retrofit work The Council’s retrofit programme comprises the following work streams: 1. Building capacities and skills to get the job done: -
Partnership for Government energy efficiency and retrofit funding: The
Council has invested in professionals who have in turn built and led the
Cambridgeshire Energy Retrofit Partnership (CERP) which as a grant application
and delivery vehicle has attracted over £25m in energy efficiency and retrofit
programmes. The latest 2023-2025 £8.6m programme retrofitting 494 low energy
efficient homes owned by low-income households across the County. This equated
to an estimated 490 tonnes of CO2 saving. This was achieved through a
combination of government grant funding and funding awarded by CPCA. -
Partnership for Government water retrofit programme: The shared planning
service is leading a £5m a programme to reduce water consumption in Council
homes across the City and South Cambridgeshire -
On the supply side, CERP procurement for a pipeline of energy efficiency
and retrofit works has enabled contractors to invest in their business and
critically apprenticeships and skills across the full range of trades. -
On the demand side, the Council has published a ‘how to’ retrofit guide
for different housing archetypes for the construction industry and
‘able/willing to pay’ households which the CPCA is extending and promoting
across Cambridgeshire and Peterborough. The newly developed guide will
highlight homes which are “heat pump ready.” -
The 3C Building Control service has launched a building regulations
advisory service for applicants retrofitting houses and listed buildings -
To encourage retrofit at scale and pace, some of the wider work of
Cambridge City Council include collaborating on a research piece with the
Cambridge Institute of Sustainability Leaders, which is expected to be released
in the Summer: “RetroFit For
Future: Scaling building decarbonisation across Greater Cambridge. The aim of
this piece will be to identify and detail an array of practical levers for us
to encourage retrofit and the co-benefits, such as supporting the increase of
green skills, supporting the growth of the local economy, and developing access
to finance mechanisms for those that don’t meet grant criteria. -
City Council has created a new “Energy and Retrofit” team which has
pulled together colleagues and expertise from across the organisation who work
on energy and retrofit across our council owned homes, private housing and our
own corporate, commercial and community properties into a new centre of
excellence. The team will seek funding and partnership opportunities to support
and deliver our commitments to decarbonise homes and businesses across
Cambridge with an invigorated streamlined approach. -
CERP are currently seeking endorsement to create a retrofit strategy for
Cambridgeshire and Peterborough. With no national strategy in place to look at
retrofit holistically there is a requirement to support local economy, market
capacity and upskilling and leverage of private finance – a clear strategic
local approach and long-term vision for delivery is important to ensure these
can be reconciled. 2. Getting the job done, retrofitting most energy inefficient Council
homes -
We have two principal projects underway. Using a mix of our own funds
and central government grants we have so far retrofitted 225 homes to EPC C
standard. We have recently received funding for a further 370 council homes
over the next two years with support from the Social Housing Decarbonisation
Fund Wave 2.1 (£2.26m) and the Warm Homes Social Housing Fund Wave 3 and a
further 130 properties in 2027/28. The funding focuses on external wall
insulation, ventilation through extractor fans and indoor air quality, but
general improvements such replacing windows and doors when they are near to end
of life and top-up loft insulation to 300mm are incorporated as much as
possible. -
The second project is a net-zero home pilot on Ross Street and Coldhams Grove investing up to £5m to retrofit fully 50
homes to net zero carbon standards. Monitoring and evaluating results are key
to this project to inform future retrofit projects and outcomes. More than half of all heat loss from these homes is through uninsulated
solid brick walls and about sixth is lost through the floor and roof. The
retrofit measures involve: ·
adding insulation to the external walls, floor and roofs to reduce heat
loss in winter and heat gain in summer. ·
replacing gas boilers and fossil fuel systems with clean heat solutions
such as air source heat pumps, which typically produce about three times as
much energy as they use. ·
installing new mechanical ventilation with heat recovery (MVHR) systems.
These will replace stale, moist air with fresh, filtered air and reduce heat
loss. It also reduces humidity and the risk of condensation and mould. ·
installing photovoltaic (PV) solar panels to the roofs, to provide
electricity for the homes. This will contribute to the running of the heat
pumps and MVHR systems. It will also enable qualifying tenants to claim Smart Export Guarantee payments. ·
upgrading to triple-glazed windows and composite external doors to
reduce heat loss, draughts and condensation. It will also provide better
insulation against external noise. ·
Investing in the Grade II listed Guildhall so that it will be net zero
carbon in operation 3. Retrofitting private sector homes -
Cambridge City Council acts as Lead Authority delivering
government-funded capital retrofit programmes across Cambridgeshire – operating
as a partnership between all the Cambridgeshire authorities including
Peterborough City Council and CPCA. Having successfully delivered over
£9m of energy efficiency and clean heat measures through the Home Upgrade Grant
2, we have recently secured a further £8.5m from the Warm Homes: Local Grant to
continue delivery for the next 3 years. These grants are designed to support
low income, fuel poor households who live in the most inefficient, poorly
performing homes. -
In partnership with the CPCA, the City council
was awarded a further £950,000 to complete retrofit upgrades across the County. -
Cambridge City Council also participates in the Energy Company
Obligation (ECO 4) administered by Ofgem, which focusses on supporting
low-income, vulnerable and fuel poor households through installation of
insulation and heating measures. -
The Cambridgeshire Energy Retrofit Partnership (CERP) operating under
the brand of ‘Action on Energy,’ provides communities with advice on how to
maximise energy efficiency within homes, save money on energy bills, cut carbon
emissions and support to find accredited installers. -
The contractor’s framework agreement for the provision of energy
efficiency works is also accessible to residents across Cambridgeshire, helping
homeowners who are able or willing to pay for measures to navigate the market
for suppliers and find accredited contractors to do retrofit work. -
With the framework in place, we have been able to develop the social
benefits of the retrofit work. Contractors are offering their skills,
volunteering and funding projects through “Match my Project.” This process is
demonstrating strong community value in the stimulation of the retrofit market. 4. Retrofitting non-domestic building stock -
This council has set itself an ambitious target to achieve net-zero
energy use by 2030 for council properties where we control the energy supply.
This includes properties we occupy or manage, like community centres, as well
as common areas in housing or commercial buildings we own and operate. -
In 2023, we completed a £1.7mn project (funded by Public Sector
Decarbonisation Fund) to retrofit Parkside and Abbey Pools, installing air
source heat pumps and energy efficiency upgrades. -
We have recently won Salix funding for decarbonization measures for the
crematorium, Brown's Field Community Centre and Trumpington Pavillion -
including systems controls, insulation, lighting replacement and solar panel
installation. -
We are developing proposals for a district heat network with the
University of Cambridge, city centre Colleges and Anglia Ruskin University. The
aim is to create a renewable heat network in the city by 2030 to supply
renewable heat and hot water around the city centre to help decarbonize
buildings. This project is currently in the detailed design and business case
development phase. -
The Civic Quarter redevelopment will upgrade the Guildhall and
Corn Exchange. We are aiming for exemplar project outcomes, targeting, water
neutrality and a Biodiversity Net Gain of 20% across the Civic Quarter and
Operational Net Zero for the Guildhall. The design work to date includes
consideration of fabric upgrades and alignment with ENERPHIT and LETI
standards, introduction of water saving measures, PV panels and enabling a
future connection to the proposed city centre District Heating Network This Council will ask the leader to write to the Secretary of State for
Energy Security and Net Zero, Ed Milliband, and the
Chancellor, Rachel Reeves, to: 1. Note the nation’s housing stock accounts for almost 20% of the UK’s
carbon emissions and is so energy inefficient that over 6m households are in
fuel poverty, unable to afford to heat their homes to the temperature needed to
keep warm and healthy. 2. Note that without increasing investment to accelerate retrofit, the
UK is missing out on multiple dividends for people, the planet and economy as
retrofit: ·
Responds to the cost-of-living crisis through lower energy bills ·
Mitigates climate change through lower fossil fuel emissions ·
Adapts to climate change by keeping homes cooler during more frequent
and extreme heatwaves ·
Improves quality of life through consistent and comfortable indoor
temperature throughout the year, ·
Improves public health and productive health life expectancy with better
ventilation and indoor air quality protecting residents from damp, condensation
and mould associated asthma and bronchial illnesses. ·
Creates conditions for new labour-intensive businesses to grow, build
the skilled workforces and finance products needed to scale-up retrofit across
the UK. 3. Request Government to give local government confidence to plan for
large scale retrofit programmes and their contractors and firms in supply
chains to invest in apprenticeships and skills training by: i) Replacing the previous Government’s grant making regimes with one that
is: ·
consistent and long term (instead of intermittent and short term), ·
allocated against deliverable programmes (in place of wasteful
competitive bidding) and ·
flexible (in place of hard to meet ring fenced eligibility criteria) ii) Incentivising employers to invest in workforce skills recruitment
and development as a well-trained workforce is essential for delivering an
effective, sustainable retrofit programme. iii) Requiring independent regulation of retrofit work with quality
assurance standards alongside robust monitoring and measurement of
effectiveness and value of retrofit dividends. iv) Facilitating investment across all tenures from registered
providers, afford to pay owner occupiers and private rented sector. 4. Request Government to require in the forthcoming Future Homes
Standard to require installation of solar panels, set higher ventilation and
building fabric standards and progress approaches to reducing embodied carbon
in new buildings, noting that because the last Government scrapped Labour’s
zero-carbon home standard, 1.35m homes built since 2016 will have to be
retrofitted at a cost of up to £2bn. |
||||||||||
|
Written questions No discussion will take place on this
item. Members will be asked to note the written questions and answers document as
circulated around the Chamber.
Minutes: Members were asked to note the written questions and answers that had been placed in the information pack circulated around the Chamber. |