Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Agenda and minutes
Venue: Council Chamber, The Guildhall, Market Square, Cambridge, CB2 3QJ
Contact: Democratic Services Committee Manager
No. | Item | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apologies and Declaration of Interests Minutes: Apologies Apologies were received from Councillors Cantrill, Dryden, Lord,
McPherson, McQueen, Davey, Thittala, Page-Croft and Price. Councillor Gehring gave apologies for lateness. Declarations of Interest
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
To consider the recommendations of the Executive for adoption |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Executive Councillor for Housing: HRA Budget-Setting Report (BSR) 2020/21 PDF 108 KB Additional documents:
Minutes: In the absence of Councillor Cantrill,
Councillor Matthews proposed the following amendment to paragraph (l) of the
recommendation (additional text underlined): Treasury management I) Approve the need to borrow over
the 30 year life of the business plan, with the first
instance of this anticipated to be in 2022/23, to a.
Undertake a significant investment in the existing
housing stock, with a specific focus on those homes that do not meet the Decent
Homes standard especially the dwellings that fail the category 1 hazards
assessment with a clear goal to achieve a zero position in the short term
(note: 799 houses failed to meet the Decent Homes Standard in March 2019) b.
Sustain the current level of investment of £10,000,000
per annum for the delivery of new homes On a show of hands
the amendment was lost by 12 votes to 20. Resolved (by 20 votes to 0)
to: i)
Approve
the need to borrow over the 30-year life of the business plan, with the first
instance of this anticipated to be in 2022/23, to sustain the current level of
investment, which includes £10,000,000 per annum for the delivery of new homes. ii)
Recognise
that any decision to borrow further will impact the authority’s ability to
set-aside resource to redeem 25% of the value of the housing debt by the point
at which the loan portfolio matures, with the approach to this to be reviewed
before further borrowing commences. iii) Approve of capital bids and savings, shown
in Appendix D (3) of the HRA Budget Setting Report, to include funding to begin
to improve the energy efficiency of the existing housing stock. iv) Approve of the latest Decent Homes
Programme, to include an updated recharge of capitalised officer time and
timing of decent homes expenditure for new build dwellings, as detailed in
Appendix E of the HRA Budget Setting Report. v)
Approve
of the latest budget sums, profiling and associated financing for all new build
schemes, including revised scheme budgets for Akeman Street, Meadows and Buchan
Street and Campkin Road, based upon the latest cost
information from the Cambridge Investment Partnership (CIP) or direct
procurements, as detailed in Appendices E and H, and summarised in Appendix K,
of the HRA Budget Setting Report. vi) Approve re-phasing of budget for the Estate
Improvement Scheme, to also include reallocation of the resource between
capital and revenue based upon the projects identified to date, as detailed in
Appendix E, and summarised in Appendix K, of the HRA Budget Setting Report. vii)Approve the revised Housing Capital Investment Plan as shown in Appendix
K of the HRA Budget Setting Report. viii) Approve inclusion of Disabled Facilities
Grant expenditure and associated grant income from 2020/21 onwards, based upon
2019/20 grant levels, with approval of delegation to the Head of Finance, as
Section 151 Officer, to approve an in year increase or decrease in the budget
for disabled facilities grants, in direct relation to any increase or decrease
in the capital grant funding for this purpose, as received from the County
Council through the Better Care Fund. ix)
Approve
delegation to the Strategic Director to review and amend the level of fees
charged by the Shared Home Improvement Agency for disabled facilities grants
and repair assistance grants, in line with any decisions made by the Shared
Home Improvement Agency Board. x)
Approve
delegation to the Strategic Director, in consultation with the Head of Finance,
as Section 151 Officer, to draw down resource from the ear-marked reserve for
potential debt redemption or re-investment, for the purpose of open market land
or property acquisition or new build housing development, should the need
arise, in order to meet quarterly deadlines for the use of retained right to
buy receipts or to facilitate future site redevelopment. xi)
Approve
delegation to the Head of Finance, as Section 151 Officer, to make the
necessary technical amendments to detailed budgets in respect of the outcome of
the review of recharges between the General Fund and the HRA and the outcome of
the review of the pension fund deficit contribution, with any net impact for
the HRA to be incorporated as part of the HRA Medium Term Financial Strategy in
September 2020. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Executive Councillor for Finance and Resources: Capital Strategy 2020/2021 PDF 178 KB Additional documents:
Minutes: Resolved (by 20 votes to 0) to: i. Approve
the capital strategy; and ii. Note
the summary capital programme |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additional documents: Minutes: Resolved (by 21 votes to 0) to: i. Approve the Officer’s report, including the estimated Prudential & Treasury Indicators for 2019/20 to 2023/24 (inclusive) as set out in Appendix C of the officers report. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
To consider Budget Recommendations of the Executive for Adoption |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Budget Setting Report (General Fund) 2020/21 PDF 111 KB Additional documents:
Minutes: The Executive
presented its budget recommendations as set out in the Council Agenda and
published on the City Council’s website. Members were asked to
note the updated Land Charge Fees which had been included on page 11 of the
Information Pack and also the amended Appendix A(b), which had been circulated
round the chamber and published on the council’s website which corrected an
error with the County Council precept. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Liberal Democrat Group Amendment to the Executive Budget Recommendations PDF 223 KB Additional documents:
Minutes: The Liberal Democrat Group presented its alternative budget, as set out
in the Council Agenda, on the amendment sheet circulated around the Chamber and
published on the City Council’s website. On a show of hands the Liberal Democrat Group’s alternative budget was
lost by: 12 votes in
favour: Councillors Bick, Chadwick, Dalzell, Gehring, Martinelli, Matthews,
McGerty, Payne, Pippas, Porrer, Summerbell and Tunnacliffe To 20 votes
against: Councillors Ashton, Baigent, Barnett, Bird, Collis, Davies, Green,
Hadley, Herbert, Johnson, Massey, Moore, O’Reilly, Robertson, Sargeant, Sheil,
Smart, Smith, Thornburrow and Todd-Jones. In accordance with the Council’s budget procedure, Councillor Bick moved
separately the following proposals, which formed part of the Liberal Democrat
Group alternative budget:
On a show of hands the proposal
was lost by: 12 votes in favour: Councillors Bick, Chadwick, Dalzell,
Gehring, Martinelli, Matthews, McGerty, Payne, Pippas, Porrer, Summerbell and
Tunnacliffe To 19 votes
against: Councillors Ashton, Baigent, Barnett, Bird, Collis, Davies, Green,
Hadley, Herbert, Johnson, Massey, Moore, O’Reilly, Robertson, Sargeant, Sheil,
Smart, Smith and Todd-Jones. 1 abstention: Councillor Thornburrow
On a show of hands the proposal
was lost by: 12 votes in favour: Councillors Bick, Chadwick, Dalzell,
Gehring, Martinelli, Matthews, McGerty, Payne, Pippas, Porrer, Summerbell and
Tunnacliffe To 20 votes
against: Councillors Ashton, Baigent, Barnett, Bird, Collis, Davies, Green,
Hadley, Herbert, Johnson, Massey, Moore, O’Reilly, Robertson, Sargeant, Sheil,
Smart, Smith, Thornburrow and Todd-Jones.
On a show of hands the proposal was lost by: 12 votes in favour: Councillors Bick, Chadwick, Dalzell, Gehring,
Martinelli, Matthews, McGerty, Payne, Pippas, Porrer, Summerbell and
Tunnacliffe To
20 votes against: Councillors
Ashton, Baigent, Barnett, Bird, Collis, Davies, Green, Hadley, Herbert,
Johnson, Massey, Moore, O’Reilly, Robertson, Sargeant, Sheil, Smart, Smith,
Thornburrow and Todd-Jones.
On a show of hands the proposal
was lost by: 12 votes in favour: Councillors Bick, Chadwick, Dalzell,
Gehring, Martinelli, Matthews, McGerty, Payne, Pippas, Porrer, Summerbell and
Tunnacliffe To 20 votes
against: Councillors Ashton, Baigent, Barnett, Bird, Collis, Davies, Green,
Hadley, Herbert, Johnson, Massey, Moore, O’Reilly, Robertson, Sargeant, Sheil,
Smart, Smith, Thornburrow and Todd-Jones.
On a show of hands the proposal
was lost by: 12 votes in favour: Councillors Bick, Chadwick, Dalzell,
Gehring, Martinelli, Matthews, McGerty, Payne, Pippas, Porrer, Summerbell and
Tunnacliffe To 20 votes
against: Councillors Ashton, Baigent, Barnett, Bird, Collis, Davies, Green,
Hadley, Herbert, Johnson, Massey, Moore, O’Reilly, Robertson, Sargeant, Sheil,
Smart, Smith, Thornburrow and Todd-Jones.
On a show of hands the proposal
was lost by: 12 votes in favour: Councillors Bick, Chadwick, Dalzell,
Gehring, Martinelli, Matthews, McGerty, Payne, Pippas, Porrer, Summerbell and
Tunnacliffe To 20 votes against: Councillors
Ashton, Baigent, Barnett, Bird, Collis, Davies, Green, Hadley, Herbert,
Johnson, Massey, Moore, O’Reilly, Robertson, Sargeant, Sheil, Smart, Smith,
Thornburrow and Todd-Jones. Unless otherwise stated, all references
in the recommendations to sections, pages and appendices relate to Version 2 of
the Budget Setting Report (BSR). This can be found via: It was RESOLVED to agree the Executive’s budget proposals by: 19 votes in favour: Councillors Ashton, Barnett, Bird, Collis,
Davies, Green, Hadley, Herbert, Johnson, Massey, Moore, O’Reilly, Robertson,
Sargeant, Sheil, Smart, Smith, Thornburrow and Todd-Jones. To 0 votes against 12 abstentions: Councillors Bick, Chadwick, Dalzell, Gehring,
Martinelli, Matthews, McGerty, Payne, Pippas, Porrer, Summerbell and
Tunnacliffe To approve the following: i.
Revenue
Pressures shown in Appendix C (b) and Savings shown in Appendix C (c) of the
officer’s report. ii.
Non-Cash
Limit items as shown in Appendix C (d) of officer’s
report. iii.
No bids to
be funded from External or Earmarked Funds (which would be included as Appendix
C (e) of the officer’s report). iv.
Delegation
to the Chief Financial Officer (Head of Finance) of the calculation and
determination of the Council Tax taxbase (including submission of the National
Non-Domestic Rates Forecast Form, NNDR1, for each financial year) set out in
Appendix A (a) of the officer’s report. v.
The level of
Council Tax for 2020/21 as set out in Appendix A (b) as amended. vi.
Delegation
to the Head of Finance to finalise changes relating to any corporate and/or
departmental restructuring and any reallocation of support service and central
costs, in accordance with the CIPFA Service Reporting Code of Practice for
Local Authorities (SeRCOP). vii.
Any recommendation in respect of the proposals
outlined in Appendix D(a) of officer’s report for inclusion in the Capital Plan
including any additional use of revenue resources required. viii.
The revised Capital Plan for the General Fund as
set out in Appendix D (c) of the officer’s report, and the Funding as set out
in Section 6, page 25 of the BSR. ix.
The impact of revenue and capital
budget approvals and approved the resulting level of reserves to be used to
support the budget proposals as set out in the table in section 8, page 46 of
the BSR. x.
The creation of an earmarked reserves
to be called the Transformation Fund and its associated remit on page 19 of the
BSR. xi.
The updated Corporate Plan 2019-2022 attached as
Appendix B to the officer’s report. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
To consider the recommendations of Committees for adoption |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Civic Affairs: Pay Policy Statement 2020/21 PDF 180 KB Additional documents: Minutes: Resolved (unanimously) to:
i.
Approve the draft Pay Policy Statement 2020/21
attached as Appendix 1 of the Officer’s report.
ii.
Delegate authority to the Head of Human Resources to
update the Pay Policy Statement 2020/21 should a chief executive and/or chief
officer and/or NJC pay award be agreed. iii. Introduce a pay award mechanism with effect from 1 April 2020 for staff on Cambridge Live terms and conditions of employment, based on comparison to the NJC pay award and authority is delegated to the Head of Human Resources to implement any future pay awards, following consultation with the Chief Executive and Executive Councillor for Finance and Resources. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Civic Affairs: Amendment to Council Procedure Rules PDF 82 KB Additional documents: Minutes: Resolved (unanimously) to approve a change to Council Procedure Rule 10 and
the Scheme for Annual Statements as set out in the officer’s report. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
To deal with oral questions Minutes: 1.
Councillor Porrer to the Leader Could the Executive Councillor confirm that Cambridge City
Council will continue to display the European flag at the Guildhall in future
to show our support for our European residents and visitors and to highlight
our city's ongoing strong connections to the rest of Europe? The Leader
responded that in addition to the Guildhall being lit up blue and yellow on the
day the UK would be leaving the EU, the European flag would be flown on 9 May
and would continue to be flown in perpetuity on 9 May. 2.
Councillor Collis to the Executive Councillor for Communities Could the Executive Councillor provide an update on the
anti-poverty strategy? The Executive
Councillor responded that the Anti-Poverty Strategy was introduced in
2014. As part of the strategy a Living
Wage Officer had been introduced as well as the Anti-Poverty Fund. Hundreds of
thousands of pounds had been granted to community groups and homelessness
prevention projects. Support and advice had also been offered to universal
credit claimants. Cambridge was the most
unequal city in the country and the council and residents wanted to challenge
poverty and inequality. The Anti-Poverty
Strategy was regularly reviewed, and the council was currently undertaking a
review of the strategy. The Food Poverty
Hub was a plan included in the budget which sought to distribute food across
the city to help deal with food poverty. 3.
Councillor Dalzell to the Executive
Councillor for Finance and Resources Following significant delays to the completion of the Council's
statutory audit last year, which is still yet to be completed, can the
Executive Councillor confirm what steps the Council are taking to prevent these
problems recurring? The Executive
Councillor responded there was a delay in the audit of the Council’s accounts
due to Central Government’s move to require a short timetable for all council’s
to have their audits of accounts completed. The pressure on councils had been
immense but it has also been immense on auditors themselves. Both CIPFA and the
Institute for Chartered Accountants had complained to Central Government about
the pressure which has been put on everyone. The pressures had led to many
firms of auditors losing staff because of the pressure that the staff were put
under to complete the work in such a short period of time. The Council’s
auditors were unable to complete the Council’s audit in the reduced timescales.
Increased
expectations arising from high profile corporate failures had also added
pressure on auditors. The council was involved in complex activities, and
additional requirements regarding disclosure were also imposed on the council. The Executive
Councillor acknowledged changes within the Council’s Finance Team had also
created problems. Preparations were being put in place to ensure the 2020/21
year’s audit of accounts could be completed by October. 4.
Councillor
Todd Jones to the Executive Councillor for Climate Change, Environment and City Centre Can the Executive Councillor
update us on what is known about Extinction Rebellion's plans for the city
centre next week? The Executive Councillor responded that she was aware of
some of Extinction Rebellion’s plans which had taken place the previous week but
was not aware of what any future plans might be. 5.
Councillor Pippas to the Leader of the Council Given Cambridge’s large and
peace-loving Chinese community, does the leader share my concern at reports of
hate crimes against Chinese people in this area related
to coronavirus? The Leader responded that he shared the concerns expressed
by Councillor Pippas. It was outrageous
that Chinese residents and students had been targeted by hate crimes. Some
blame lay with the media who had whipped up un-necessary fears regarding the
Coronovirus. He understood why there was a need for the World Health Organisation
to react. The council needed to work
with and support the Chinese community. 6.
Councillor Gehring to the Leader Given that Brexit is far from being done, what are the City doing to
prepare? The Leader responded that the Council had made various preparations
in readiness for a no-deal Brexit and its impacts on the council and
communities the council supports. The
Council would continue to work to protect the rights of EU citizens. It was
known that they would be able to vote and stand in the elections this year. The
Government had made no statement to date whether that is an on-going
commitment. There were 23,000 EU citizens in Cambridge, we need to protect
their rights. He feared that the UK
would leave the EU with no deal in place. 7.
Councillor Bick to the Executive Councillor for Planning Policy
and Open Spaces Now the 5-year contract with the
ice rink and fun fair on Parker’s Piece has ended, what are the Executive
Councillor’s plans for the future? The Executive Councillor responded that officers from
the Streets and Open Spaces Team were currently considering a range of options
and were re-evaluating the impact of events as part of the review process. She
was expecting officers to make recommendations in the next few weeks 8.
Councillor O’Reilly to the Executive Councillor for Communities What measures are being taken to make the Folk Festival as
green as possible? The Executive Councillor responded that the Cambridge Folk Festival had been working for some time to be as ethical as it could be. Some of the things addressed included the efficient use of renewable energy, seasonal sustainable ethically sourced food, getting rid of single use plastic bottles and having freely available drinking water. There were also festival water bottles available. The Folk Festival also used (almost) 100% renewable energy, tried to do as much recycling as possible and provided compost toilets. Food donations were also made to Cambridge Community Lunches. For the second year running the Folk Festival had been
declared outstanding in the International Greener festival awards. This award
assessed events and festivals which have demonstrated a strong commitment to
sustainability and a reduction in environmental impacts. The Executive
Councillor congratulated all of the Folk Festival Team and Cambridge Live staff
in achieving this award. 9.
Councillor
Matthews to the Leader Does the Leader support his group’s strategy to address sustainability? The Leader responded that he was very proud of everything
that the Council was doing and recognised that a lot more could be achieved on
sustainability. He would highlight the following measures which had not been
recognised in the budget debate. A Corporate Energy and Carbon Reduction
Manager post had been created. The
Council had focussed on tackling biodiversity and making climate change a
priority in the local plan. He thought
there was a need to move towards passivhaus provision. The Council had received
funding from Europe for trees. The Council had also worked in partnership with
the Climate Change Commission. He also highlighted the strategic implementation
of the Biodiversity Emergency Strategy. 10.
Councillor Ashton to the Executive Councillor for Housing Can the Executive Councillor inform Council of how many days the Severe
Weather Emergency Protocol (SWEP) has been in operation during the last few
months, how many rough sleepers have taken shelter under this provision since
October 2019, and what steps the local authority takes, in concert with
stakeholders, in promoting the provision in times of bad weather? The Executive Councillor responded that the SWEP protocol
has been in operation for 40 nights from the beginning of October 2019 and 12
February 2020. This had provided emergency shelter for 100 individuals. It would
be invoked again from tomorrow until 2 March 2020 due to the predicted cold
weather. The Council’s promotion of SWEP has developed significantly over the
last 2 winters includes an email distributed to over 100 local partners (3 days
in advance of SWEP) who can distribute it to people who will come into contact
with rough sleepers. A Streets Outreach Service operated 3 shifts, 5 nights a
week to encourage rough sleepers into accommodation. A new SWEP weekend
outreach service which is an extension of the Street Outreach service which
operates on weekend evenings when SWEP is triggered. Promotions on the
Council’s social media sites and on the new Street Support website and app. The following
oral questions were tabled but owing to the expiry of the period of time
permitted, were not covered during the meeting. The Mayor asked Executive
Councillors if a written response could be provided to those questions that had
not been covered. 11.
Councillor Cantrill to Executive
Councillor for Climate Change, Environment and City Centre Does the Executive Councillor agree with me that we should do everything
possible to encourage residents to recycle? 12.
Councillor Martinelli to the Executive Councillor for Planning
Policy and Open Spaces Is the Executive Councillor satisfied with the progress of
the resurfacing works on Parker's Piece? 13.
Councillor McQueen to the Executive Councillor for Communities Could the Executive Councillor advise what is being planned
for LGBT+ History month? 14.
Councillor Chadwick to the Executive
Councillor Planning Policy and Open Spaces Does the Executive Councillor worry about the number of hotels in
Cambridge? 15.
Councillor Payne to the Executive
Councillor for Housing Can the Executive Councillor comment on whether the recent claims in the
Cambridge News that hundreds of Cambridge Council houses fail to meet basic
living standards are justifiable? 16.
Councillor Summerbell to the Executive Councillor for Climate Change, Environment and City Centre Can the Executive Councillor please outline the plans and
targets in place to improve the recycling rate in Cambridge, particularly with
respect to plastic recycling?" 17.
Councillor Smart to the Executive Councillor for Communities What is being planned to support non-UK EU
citizens in Cambridge? 18.
Councillor Davies to the Executive Councillor for Communities What activities are being planned for young people over Half
Term? 19.
Councillor Barnett to the
Executive Councillor for Housing Could the Executive Councillor for Housing detail the significance of the Council recently being awarded the Domestic Abuse Housing Alliance (DAHA) accreditation? |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Written questions No discussion will take place on this
item. Members will be asked to note the written questions and answers document as
circulated around the Chamber.
Minutes: Members were
asked to note the written questions and answers that had been placed in the
information pack circulated around the Chamber. |