Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Agenda and minutes
Venue: Council Chamber, The Guildhall, Market Square, Cambridge, CB2 3QJ [access the building via Peashill entrance]. View directions
Contact: Sarah Steed Committee Manager
No. | Item |
---|---|
Apologies for Absence Minutes: Apologies were received from Councillors Adey, Ashton, Gehring, Page-Croft and Sarris. |
|
Declarations of Interest Minutes: No declarations of interest were made. |
|
Public Questions Time See the foot of the agenda for details of the scheme Minutes: Members of the public asked a number of questions, as set out below. 1.
Wendy
Blythe raised the following points:
i.
Wanted
to put on record comments regarding devolution and representation.
ii.
Queried
why local authorities who made up the combined authority gave the Local
Economic Partnership (LEP) a vote on devolution. This gave them
disproportionate influence. ·
The
combined authorities were already spending money and having a large effect on
public lives. ·
Devolution
should be under democratic control. The Leader responded that the LEP’s ability
to vote was still to be determined. Wendy Blythe made the following
supplementary points:
i.
The
position regarding LEP voting power was unclear in the published agenda pack.
ii.
People
felt very strongly about this.
iii.
Democratic
representation was needed. The Leader responded with the following: i.
The LEP represented a lot of small
and large businesses. ii.
Acknowledged the point that people
needed to be represented. 2.
Kelley
Green queried what devolution meant and how it would help local businesses. The Leader responded: i.
There were large and small
businesses in the city. ii.
The LEP were consulted on
devolution in the summer and were positive towards the package. iii.
The economy of Cambridgeshire
needed to take into account the views of small businesses. iv.
Growth was affected by various
factors such as Brexit. |
|
Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Devolution PDF 440 KB Additional documents:
Minutes: The Mayor ruled in for consideration Appendix 1A and the accompanying
officer briefing note, despite a copy not being available for public inspection
5 clear days before today’s meeting. He
ruled under 100B (4b) of the Local Government Act 1972 the urgency is that all
the Councils in Cambridgeshire and Peterborough must consider this item of
business by end of 22 November. The Chief Executive explained that P11 of the covering report contained a
typographical error. The table should refer to 285, not 262 responses. All the
percentages quoted were based on those 285 respondents,
they were accurate and reflected the actual figures in the data tables. The following Officer recommendation was put forward: That Full Council considers whether it
wishes to:
i.
Consent to the
Secretary of State making an Order to establish the Cambridgeshire and
Peterborough Combined Authority (Appendix A of the Officer’s report);
ii.
Consent to the Council
being a constituent member of the Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Combined
Authority with effect from the commencement date determined by the final Order;
iii.
Authorise the Chief
Executive, in consultation with the Leader of the Council, to consent to the
final draft Order and associated documents, specifically: -
To agree minor
drafting amendments to the Combined Authority Order to be laid before
Parliament; -
To consent to the
Council being included within the draft Parliamentary Order thereby reflecting
this Council’s decision;
iv.
Authorise the
Combined Authority to have a power to issue a levy to the constituent Councils
in respect of any financial year. (This will be subject to the inclusion of a
unanimity clause in the Combined Authority constitution on this specific
matter);
v.
Recommend to the
Combined Authority that the costs of establishing the Combined Authority,
holding the elections in May 2017 and running the Combined Authority (including
Mayoral Office) for 2016/17 and 2017/18 are funded from the gain share grant
provided by Government (as outlined in para 10.11);
vi.
Appoint the Leader of
Council to act as Council's appointee to the Shadow Combined Authority and once
established, to the Combined Authority;
vii.
Appoint Councillor
Price to act as the substitute to the above (ref vi);
viii.
Note the outcome of
the public consultation on the establishment of the Cambridgeshire and
Peterborough Combined Authority as outlined in paragraph 5.1 and 5.2 and
Appendices 2A - 2D;
ix.
Note the timetable
for the implementation of the Cambridgeshire and Peterborough devolution Order
as summarised in paragraph 7.1;
x.
Note the Government's
response to the outline business case for Housing capital investment funds
secured as part of the devolution deal as set out in Appendix 3.
xi.
Note that a report will come to Civic
Affairs committee on 15 February 2017 making proposals for City Council
scrutiny of its representative on the Combined Authority, as requested by Council on 27 June
2016, and to confirm detailed arrangements for the Combined Authority Overview and Scrutiny and Audit Committee.
xii.
Note that in the interim period the Leader will
report to Strategy and Resources Scrutiny Committee and to full Council on
progress made with setting up the Combined Authority and the devolution deal. Councillor Bick proposed and Councillor Avery seconded the following
amendments: Delete all original text and replace with: Council notes: ·
the lack of democratic legitimacy
in Cambridge for the changes to governance within our area which are inherent in
the current Devolution Deal, especially its proposal for an extra layer of
government in the form of an elected mayor of Cambridgeshire and Peterborough; ·
that no other predominantly
non-metropolitan area has so far accepted this model of “Devolution” and that
several other councils of various political complexions have already rejected
it to negotiate a different deal; ·
that there is no necessary
relationship between the incentives offered by the government to accept this
deal and the creation of an elected mayor and many have proven achievable
elsewhere without acceptance of an elected mayor. Council remains committed to: ·
bringing powers closer to
communities of shared interest and substantial interdependence; ·
working with neighbours to
confront challenges, share benefits, co-ordinate planning and to gain economies
of scale for the delivery of selected services; ·
achieving
decision making structures which promote simplicity, joined-up policy,
transparency and clear democratic accountability. Council therefore resolves to withhold
acceptance of the proposed deal at this time and calls on the Leader to: ·
establish an immediate dialogue
with government to deliver on its welcome willingness to fund new council
housebuilding in Cambridge in recognition of the need which they have now
accepted; ·
in the meantime take action, which
his colleagues are currently withholding, to improve and expand the supply of
council homes in the city with powers and resources they already have; ·
re-engage in discussions with
surrounding councils and the government to secure devolved powers which may be
operated on a shared basis without an elected mayor and for such an agreement
to be legally enforceable; ·
couple this with building
agreement to reduce the current two tiers of council, providing in our own area
for a unitary council focused on the economic sub region of Greater Cambridge; ·
seek
endorsement of the resulting package through a local referendum. On a show of hands the amendment was lost by 11 votes to 26. Resolved (by 26 votes to 1)
to:
i.
Consent to the
Secretary of State making an Order to establish the Cambridgeshire and
Peterborough Combined Authority (Appendix A of the Officer’s report);
ii.
Consent to the
Council being a constituent member of the Cambridgeshire and Peterborough
Combined Authority with effect from the commencement date determined by the
final Order;
iii.
Authorise the Chief
Executive, in consultation with the Leader of the Council, to consent to the
final draft Order and associated documents, specifically: -
To agree minor
drafting amendments to the Combined Authority Order to be laid before
Parliament; -
To consent to the
Council being included within the draft Parliamentary Order thereby reflecting
this Council’s decision;
iv.
Authorise the
Combined Authority to have a power to issue a levy to the constituent Councils
in respect of any financial year. (This will be subject to the inclusion of a
unanimity clause in the Combined Authority constitution on this specific
matter);
v.
Recommend to the
Combined Authority that the costs of establishing the Combined Authority,
holding the elections in May 2017 and running the Combined Authority (including
Mayoral Office) for 2016/17 and 2017/18 are funded from the gain share grant
provided by Government (as outlined in para 10.11);
vi.
Appoint Councillor
Herbert as the Council's appointee to the Shadow Combined Authority and once
established, to the Combined Authority; vii.
Appoint Councillor
Price to act as the substitute to the above (ref vi); viii.
Note the outcome of
the public consultation on the establishment of the Cambridgeshire and
Peterborough Combined Authority as outlined in paragraph 5.1 and 5.2 and
Appendices 2A - 2D;
ix.
Note the timetable
for the implementation of the Cambridgeshire and Peterborough devolution Order
as summarised in paragraph 7.1;
x.
Note the Government's
response to the outline business case for Housing capital investment funds
secured as part of the devolution deal as set out in Appendix 3.
xi.
Note that a report will come to Civic
Affairs committee on 15 February 2017 making proposals for City Council
scrutiny of its representative on the Combined Authority, as requested by Council on 27 June
2016, and to confirm detailed arrangements for the Combined Authority Overview and Scrutiny and Audit Committee. xii.
Note that in the interim period the Leader will
report to Strategy and Resources Scrutiny Committee and to full Council on
progress made with setting up the Combined Authority and the devolution deal. The Leader of the Council indicated he agreed with the recommendations
in paragraph 2.2 of the Officer’s report. The record of decision is listed
separately. |