Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Decision register
To note the Council’s joint response with South Cambridgeshire District Council to Network Rail’s Ely Area Capacity Enhancements 2 consultation
Decision Maker: Executive Councillor for Planning, Building Control, and Infrastructure
Decision published: 09/12/2021
Effective from: 09/12/2021
Decision:
Matter for Decision: |
Joint Response to
Network Rail’s Ely Area
Capacity Enhancements 2 consultation |
Why the decision had
to be made (and any alternative options): |
To provide the Councils’ comments to this
consultation in recognition of the opportunities it provides to influence
Network Rail’s Ely
Area capacity enhancements. |
The Executive Councillor’s decision(s): |
Agreed the Council’s joint response with South
Cambridgeshire District Council to Network
Rail’s Ely Area Capacity
Enhancements 2 consultation |
Reasons for the decision: |
To agree the Council’s joint response with South
Cambridgeshire District Council to Network
Rail’s Ely Area Capacity
Enhancements 2 consultation. https://democracy.cambridge.gov.uk/ecCatDisplay.aspx?sch=doc&cat=13491 Background The Ely area capacity enhancement (EACE) programme
proposes to upgrade the railway to allow more trains to run through Ely. The railway through Ely is operating at full capacity.
This means that Network Rail cannot increase the number of services through
Ely because the existing layout of the tracks, junctions, signals and
existing speed restrictions across key bridges in the Ely area acts as a
bottleneck on the network. The aim of the EACE programme is to improve connectivity
for passengers by providing an uplift in services to key destinations. Demand
for rail freight is also growing and increasing capacity through Ely will
support a shift from road to rail thereby providing a faster, greener, safer
and more efficient way of transporting goods across the country; helping to
remove lorries from roads and reduce congestion. Earlier in 2021, Network Rail consulted on the options for
upgrading the railway in the Ely South area, the results of which will be
presented in 2022. This round of public consultation includes the options for
remodelling the track at Ely North junction, Queen Adelaide level crossings
options; and options for upgrading or closing other level crossings across
the wider Ely area. Details of the consultation are available at Network
Rail’s Ely Area Consultation webpage: https://phase2b.elyareacapacity.com/ Features of the consultation relevant to Greater
Cambridge Features of the consultation relevant to Greater Cambridge
comprise: ·
Overall approach – enhancements at Ely North
junction supporting growth in wider area ·
No proposed interventions at Chesterton Level
Crossing (Fen Road) ·
Changes proposed to two level crossings in
Waterbeach including Bottisham Road/Bannold Road
but more materially Burgess Drove, where there are two options consulted on:
1 – Remove vehicle crossing rights but retain access for pedestrians and
cyclists; 2 - Close Burgess Drove Level crossing Proposed response points The proposed key response points and reasons supporting
these are as follows. The proposed full response is provided at Appendix A
which can be viewed at the link below: https://democracy.cambridge.gov.uk/ecCatDisplay.aspx?sch=doc&cat=13491 ·
The need for capacity enhancements at Ely
North junction to be sufficient to cater for all planned growth, noting
national and local priorities to support more sustainable travel ·
Request to reconsider the consultation’s
proposal not to make any further intervention planned at Chesterton Level
Crossing, given the significant current impact of downtime there and
potential for further downtime with the additional planned growth in
services. ·
Burgess Drove Level Crossing: Of the two
options proposed, support option 1 - Remove vehicle crossing rights but
retain access for pedestrians and cyclists, to support the Councils’ access
to food growing and access to nature priorities, noting that the level
crossing provides access for village residents to allotments and the River
Cam. |
Scrutiny consideration: |
The Chair and Spokespersons of Planning & Transport
Scrutiny Committee were consulted prior to the action being authorised. |
Report: |
Details of the background are set out in this Record of
Decision. There are no relevant financial considerations. |
Conflicts of
interest: |
None |
Comments: |
No adverse comments were made. |
Lead officer: Caroline Hunt, Claire Tunnicliffe
To approve the amendments to the Greater Cambridge Local Plan First Proposals document and supporting documents as set out in the schedule appended to this decision.
Decision Maker: Executive Councillor for Planning, Building Control, and Infrastructure
Decision published: 09/12/2021
Effective from: 09/12/2021
Decision:
Matter for Decision: Why the decision had to be made (and any
alternative options): The Executive Councillor’s decision(s): Reasons for the decision: Scrutiny consideration: Conflicts of interest: Comments: |
Greater Cambridge Local Plan: Preferred Options (Regulation 18) – Post
Scrutiny Committee Changes This decision relates to
specific delegations to the Executive Councillor for Planning and Transport
agreed at the Planning & Transport Scrutiny Committee 28 September 2021 The Local Plan is being prepared jointly for the Cambridge City
Council and South Cambridgeshire District Council authority areas, the First
Proposals consultation documents were considered by the following meetings: • Joint
Local Plan Advisory Group (JLPAG) 8 September 2021 • South
Cambridgeshire District Council Scrutiny & Overview 21 September 2021 • South
Cambridgeshire District Council Climate and Environment Advisory Committee 21
September 2021 • Cambridge
Planning & Transport Scrutiny Committee 28 September 2021 • South
Cambridgeshire District Council Cabinet 1 October 2021 Following the meetings, and in liaison with JLPAG members, amendments
have been identified to the Local Plan First Proposals document and
supporting documents, responding to issues raised at the meetings and
providing clarifications on a number of issues. These amendments are provided
in a schedule appended to this decision as appendix 1 (which includes Annex
1: Greater Cambridge Local Plan: First Proposals Sustainability Appraisal
(October 2021) and Annex 2: Greater Cambridge Local Plan: First Proposals
Sustainability Appraisal Non-Technical Summary (October 2021), both revised
to reflect changes in the schedule, and Annex 3: a finalised version the
Greater Cambridge Local Plan Preferred Options Transport Evidence Report). The purpose of this decision is to approve these amendments. Note: To ensure an aligned agreement on these documents between
Cambridge City Council and South Cambridgeshire District Council, the South
Cambridgeshire District Council Portfolio Holder for Planning Policy and
Delivery is also taking an out of cycle decision on them at the same time. To approve the amendments to the
Greater Cambridge Local Plan First Proposals document and supporting
documents as set out in the schedule appended to this decision. Supporting
documents can be viewed at the link below: Document
Supporting Documentation - Cambridge Council Outlined in the report why the decision had been made The Chair and Opposition Spokes of Planning and Transport Scrutiny
Committee were consulted prior to the action being authorised. None known. No adverse comments were made. |
Lead officer: Jonathan Dixon