Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Decision register
To report on or agree the Council’s response a number of current neighbouring Local Plan consultations, including:
• East Cambridgeshire Local Plan Single Issue Review Proposed Submission (Regulation 19)
• West Suffolk Local Plan Preferred Options (Regulation 18) consultation
• Uttlesford Draft Local Plan (Regulation 18) consultation
• Bedford Borough Local Plan 2040 Plan for Submission (Regulation
Decision Maker: Executive Councillor for Planning, Building Control, and Infrastructure
Decision published: 28/10/2022
Effective from: 28/06/2022
Decision:
Matter for Decision
The report sought agreement to key responses to one current
and one imminent Local Plan consultations in districts neighbouring or near to
Greater Cambridge
Decision of the Executive Councillor for Planning and
Infrastructure.
i.
Agreed the proposed response to the West Suffolk
Local Plan Preferred Options (Regulation 18) consultation as set out in
Appendix 1 of the Officer’s report, and the proposed response to the Bedford
Borough Local Plan 2040 Plan for Submission (Regulation 19) as set out in
Appendix 2 of the Officer’s report.
ii.
Agreed that any material changes to the
responses to the West Suffolk Local Plan Preferred Options (Regulation 18) and
the Bedford Borough Local Plan 2040 Plan for Submission (Regulation 19) arising
from consideration by South Cambridgeshire District Council, will be agreed via
an out of cycle decision by the Executive Councillor for Planning and
Infrastructure in consultation with the Chair and Spokes for the Planning &
Transport Scrutiny Committee, and in liaison with the South Cambridgeshire Lead
Cabinet Member for Planning.
iii.
Agreed to grant delegated authority to the Joint
Director of Planning and Economic Development, in liaison with the South
Cambridgeshire Lead Cabinet member for Planning and the Cambridge City Council
Executive Councillor for Planning and Infrastructure, to make any minor editing
changes to the responses to the West Suffolk Local Plan Preferred Options
(Regulation 19).
Reason for the Decision
As set out in the Officer’s report.
Any Alternative Options Considered and Rejected
Not applicable
Scrutiny Considerations
The Chair advised that as the item had not been requested
for scrutiny and debate the Committee would go straight to the vote.
The Committee
Unanimously endorsed the Officer’s recommendations.
The Executive Councillor for Planning and Infrastructure
approved the recommendations.
Conflicts of Interest Declared by the Executive
Councillor (and any Dispensations Granted)
No conflicts of interest were declared by the Executive
Councillor.
Lead officer: Caroline Hunt
To agree the Council’s response to the Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Local Transport and Connectivity Plan: draft plan consultation
Decision Maker: Executive Councillor for Planning, Building Control, and Infrastructure
Decision published: 28/10/2022
Effective from: 28/06/2022
Decision:
Matter for Decision
The report referred to a proposed joint Greater Cambridge response
with South Cambridgeshire District Council to the current Cambridgeshire and
Peterborough Local Transport and Connectivity Plan (LTCP): draft plan
consultation
The draft LTCP set out the vision, goals and objectives
which would define the strategic approach up to 2050, and the policy themes and
transport schemes to deliver those objectives.
Decision of the Executive Councillor for Planning and
Infrastructure.
i.
Agreed the proposed response to the draft Local
Transport & Connectivity Plan consultation as set out in appendix 1 of the
Officer’s report.
ii.
Would consider and agree any material changes to
the response to the draft Local Transport & Connectivity Plan consultation
proposed by South Cambridgeshire District Council, in consultation with the Chair
and Spokes for the Planning & Transport Scrutiny Committee, and in liaison
with the South Cambridgeshire Lead Cabinet Member for Planning.
iii.
Agreed to grant delegated authority to the Joint
Director of Planning and Economic Development, in liaison with the South
Cambridgeshire Lead Cabinet member for Planning and the Cambridge City Council
Executive Councillor for Planning and Infrastructure, to make any minor editing
changes to the response to the draft Local Transport & Connectivity Plan
consultation.
Reason for the Decision
As set out in the Officer’s report.
Any Alternative Options Considered and Rejected
Not applicable
Scrutiny Considerations
The Committee received a report from the Principal Planning
Officer.
The Chair advised that as the item had not been requested
for scrutiny and debate the Committee would go straight to the vote.
The Committee
Unanimously endorsed the Officer’s recommendations.
The Executive Councillor for Planning and Infrastructure
approved the recommendations.
Conflicts of Interest Declared by the Executive
Councillor (and any Dispensations Granted)
No conflicts of interest were declared by the Executive
Councillor.
Lead officer: Caroline Hunt
To agree an update to the Greater Cambridge Local Development Scheme and note a report on the results of the consultation on the Greater Cambridge Local Plan: First Proposals and the representations received.
Decision Maker: Executive Councillor for Planning, Building Control, and Infrastructure
Decision published: 28/10/2022
Effective from: 28/06/2022
Decision:
Matter for Decision
The report provided an update on the results of the
consultation on the Greater Cambridge Local Plan First Proposals (Preferred
Options) held in late 2021 and the representations received,
and sought agreement to a revised timetable for future stages of the
Local Plan, and of the North East Cambridge Area Action Plan, as set out in an
update to the Greater Cambridge Local Development Scheme.
Decision of the Executive Councillor for Planning and
Infrastructure.
i.
Noted the representations made to the Greater
Cambridge Local Plan First Proposals (Preferred Options) consultation and the
report on the consultation at Appendix 1 of the Officer’s report.
ii.
Agreed to adopt the updated Local Development
Scheme for Greater Cambridge included at Appendix 2 of the Officer’s report, to
take effect from Monday 1st August 2022.
iii.
Agreed to grant delegated authority to the Joint
Director of Planning and Economic Development, in consultation with the South
Cambridgeshire District Council Lead Cabinet member for Planning and the
Cambridge City Council Executive Councillor for Planning and Infrastructure (in
consultation with chair and spokes), to make any minor editing changes and
corrections identified to the updated Local Development Scheme for Greater
Cambridge included at Appendix 1 of the report prior to publication.
Reason for the Decision
As set out in the Officer’s report.
Any Alternative Options Considered and Rejected
Not applicable
Scrutiny Considerations
The report had been split into two parts with the Planning
Policy Manager presenting the Greater Cambridge Local
Plan First Proposals and the Strategy and Economy Manager leading on the
Local Development Scheme.
In response to comments made by the Committee on the Greater
Cambridge Local Plan First Proposals, the Joint Director for Planning and
Economic Development and Planning Policy Manager said the following:
i.
In the consultation there was a clear theme on
‘great places’ which looked to expand ideas on design policy.
ii.
Noted the Committee’s comments on specific
feedback and views in the document. All feedback would be looked at which would
help outline the design policy and make it work for places.
iii.
There had been a lot of work undertaken on the
future need for homes and the increase in population as the emerging plan had
been developed.
iv.
Officers were aware that new information on
population growth was constantly emerging; the latest results from the Office
of National Statistics had just been published.
v.
The most up to date information would be
considered regarding housing needs and jobs growth as examples; further work on
this had been recently commissioned.
vi.
Acknowledged there would be a huge amount of
content for members to reflect upon. This Committee did not meet frequently
enough to consider reviewing the responses to the document on a topic-by-topic
basis.
vii.
A programme of engagement was being considered
for the Joint Local Planning Advisory Group; this meant the document could be
broken down into smaller themes for consideration. This would also give access
to deeper analysis of all the published comments received.
viii.
All details of the consultation and each
proposal could be found on the Greater Cambridge planning services website.
Full detailed comments could also be viewed including any documents submitted.
The website also provided details of new sites with a link to the details and
an interactive map. The relevant plan could be found at the following link: Greater
Cambridge Local Plan
ix.
Noted that Members welcomed the comments made by
the public to discourage car travel on new sites. The issue of energy, water
efficiency and where children played was a high priority and was noted.
x.
With regard to individuals who disagreed with
the need of building
additional new homes each year, all feedback would assist
officers when exploring the evidence and would be viewed as part of the overall
package. Both negative and positive comments were taken into consideration.
xi.
The age profile information submitted was a
voluntary part of the submission forms and therefore members should be aware that
this data was not a complete picture of all respondents.
xii.
Noted the comments that it was important to
capture the views of younger people; the plan was for future generations.
xiii.
Welcomed suggestions on where to leave hard
copies of future consultations / documents in the local community.
xiv.
Was keen to explore ways to improve digital
means and engagement for all, including non-digital and digital users.
xv.
Acknowledged the request to show a geographical
breakdown of responses and which groups had commented such as residents,
businesses, and developers, that that this would be explored as issues were
summarised and explored further.
Councillor Smith reminded the Committee there would be an
opportunity to update the emerging local plan when it came to the draft plan
stage and any new evidence would be considered.
In response to comments made by the Committee on the revised
timetable of the future stages of the emerging Local Plan and North East
Cambridge Area Action Plan, the Joint Director for Planning and Economic
Development and Strategy and Economy Manager said the following:
i.
Updates to the Local Plan need to follow the
local plan process. To give weight to the development plan there are no
shortcuts and could not be updated rapidly. The procedure officers are
currently undertaking had to be followed.
ii.
When making planning decisions, the NPPF would
trump a five-year-old plus Local Plan unless it could be evidenced that it was
up to date. Wanted to safeguard that local policy making was retained rather than
national policy, so the proposed policy review of the adopted Local Plan in
2023 would be an important process.
iii.
Policy standards in the current plans could not
be changed before the local plan process is complete but could make sure the
development strategy, housing trajectory, the protection of space and greenbelt
etc had priority in planning making decisions.
iv.
Officers would be keeping up to date with any
changes to the NPPF and statutory changes to the planning regime which might
assist Members with their planning decisions.
v.
As the emerging Local Plan progressed though the
latter stages some consideration could be given to emerging polices as they
potentially gain weight as a plan reaches later stages of the review process.
vi.
Recognised the economy in Cambridge was vibrant;
changes in consumer behaviour and the housing market were also an element that
Officers had to take into consideration.
vii.
Officers were continually working with various
utilities providers, statutory agencies including the Environment Agency and
Cambridge Water to look at a range of issues such as water consumption, climate
change, carbon net zero. Planning was
however only one part of the regulatory framework used to advance changes
necessary in infrastructure.
viii.
Welcomed cross party working and agreement
through the process.
The Committee
Unanimously endorsed the Officers
recommendations.
The Executive Councillor for Planning and Infrastructure
approved the recommendations.
Conflicts of Interest Declared by the Executive
Councillor (and any Dispensations Granted)
No conflicts of interest were declared by the Executive
Councillor.
To approve the recommended interim approach to siting biodiversity net gain for developments across Cambridge, and to note and welcome the emerging habitat banks in Greater Cambridge,
Decision Maker: Executive Councillor for Planning, Building Control, and Infrastructure
Decision published: 28/10/2022
Effective from: 28/06/2022
Decision:
Matter for Decision
The report referred to the introduction of the requirement
for 10% Biodiversity Net Gain (BNG) above baseline conditions for all
developments in England from November 2023 as outlined in the Environment Act.
The Executive Councillor was asked to approve an interim
approach for Greater Cambridge to proposed offsite BNG to ensure that
applicants and decision makers are clear on what is expected by the Council
when considering offsite BNG proposals, prior to November 2023. This includes a
sequential approach starting with BNG provision on site wherever possible,
before considering offsite strategic habitat banks and then more local
solutions to fulfil this need encompassing the principles already set out in
the Environment Act around BNG, and emerging best practice.
Decision of the Executive Councillor for Planning and
Infrastructure
i.
Endorsed the interim approach to siting
biodiversity net gain for developments across Cambridge, and
noted and welcomed the emerging habitat banks in Greater Cambridge, with
delegated powers given to the Joint Director of Planning and Economic Development
to make minor changes to the technical note at Appendix A of the Officer’s
report.
Reason for the Decision
As set out in the Officer’s report.
Any Alternative Options Considered and Rejected
Not applicable
Scrutiny Considerations
The Natural Environment Team Leader introduced the report.
In response to comments made by the Committee, the Natural
Environment Team Leader and Built and Natural Environment Manager said the
following:
i.
Further regulations / are awaited from DEFRA;
officers did not have a complete set of guidance yet but are taking soundings
and advice from peers in Natural England, the Planning Advisory Service, and
other Local Authorities.
ii.
Nature reserve sites in private ownership that were
in poor condition which may be suitable for BNG contributions for enhancement,
but equally could be eligible for other revenue streams. Officers would look
carefully at any proposals for these sites.
iii.
The achievement of BNG was a component of
sustainable development as confirmed by central government through the National
Planning Policy Framework. Therefore, members of the planning committee could
consider the delivery of the objectives of the interim approach. However, 10 %
or the aspiration for 20% BNG was not yet part of the emerging Local Plan
policy framework and Committees could not at this point insist upon these
figures in making planning decisions.
iv.
It was the intention to encourage on-site BNG as
a priority. Training and briefings would be provided to officers and planning
committee members to outline the aim and intended outcome of this interim
approach.
v.
It would be made clear to developers the
Council’s commitment to BNG within the planning application process and what
could and should be achieved.
vi.
When the Environment Act obligations became
mandatory this would give weight to planning applications being approved or
refused on the basis that 10% BNG would or would not be delivered amongst other
material planning considerations.
vii.
The current legislation states BNG has to be
delivered but there is no actual figure; in simple terms developers have to put
back more than they take out.
viii.
The changes to the Environment Act introduced
the requirement for 10% BNG above baseline conditions for all developments in
England from November 2023 which would be a considerable increase.
ix.
All developments in Greater Cambridge should aim
to deliver high quality green infrastructure as best practice.
x.
The expectation was that after thirty years of
good management of BNG on sites, the site should be in such good condition they
would be seen as valued biodiversity locations and would not be appropriate for
any kind of built development.
xi.
Larger strategic habitat banks delivered greater
benefit to BNG securing significant improvements at a landscape scale. In
addition, these sites could be managed more effectively for BNG and could be
monitored by the local authority over a 30-year period more easily than a vast
number of smaller sites.
xii.
The emerging local plan identified large sites
in Greater Cambridge for habitat and landscape enhancement.
xiii.
Carbon sequestration was an important part of
vegetative growth but was not the primary benefit of BNG, that was
biodiversity.
xiv.
BNG would be fully funded by the developers.
xv.
Community led solutions to BNG provide smaller
opportunities due to the size of land available in the city compared to the
land available owned by various parishes in Greater Cambridge.
xvi.
There are several ways officers could verify BNG
being delivered during the local authority’s management such as aerial
photography and Google maps. There would be standard approach nationally to
measure the uplift, using the Defra metrics.
The Executive Councillor for Planning and Infrastructure
referenced six council houses that had been built on Wadloes
Road. This had produced BNG of 35% overall through an offsite community project
and onsite biodiversity. Small projects could be beneficial to biodiversity and
community.
The Committee
Unanimously endorsed the recommendations as set out
in the Officer’s report.
Conflicts of Interest Declared by the Executive
Councillor (and any Dispensations Granted)
No conflicts of interest were declared by the Executive
Councillor.
The Executive Councillor for Planning and Infrastructure
approved the recommendations and thanked the officers for all their hard work
on this matter which would benefit the city of Cambridge and Greater
Cambridgeshire significantly.
Lead officer: Claire Tunnicliffe
1. Note the findings emerging
from Community Services review work.
2. Approve the future direction of travel and approach for community
development services (to include priority work with children, young people and
families) and community centres management.
3. Approve completion of proposals and consultation for a staffing restructure
for community development and community facilities to re-align resources to
future service, and to maximise opportunities for affected staff and minimise
redundancies.
Decision Maker: Executive Councillor for Open Spaces and City Services
Decision published: 28/10/2022
Effective from: 30/06/2022
Decision:
Matter for
Decision
Following decisions made by the Executive Councillor for
Communities in October 20211 and March 20222, this report sets out an updated
direction of travel for the council’s community development service, services
for children and young people, and community centres. The reviews in each area
are being undertaken as part of the council’s Our Cambridge transformation
programme.
Decision of Executive Councillor for Open Spaces, Food
Justice and Community Development
i.
Noted the findings emerging from
Community Services review work.
ii.
Approved the future direction of
travel and approach for community development services including priority work
with children, young people, and families, and for community centres
management.
iii.
Agreed to proceed with the
consultation with staff on proposals for a staffing restructure for community
development, ChYPPS and community facilities, in accordance with the council’s
organisational change policy and, in so doing, seek to maximise opportunities
for affected staff and minimise redundancies.
Reason for the Decision
As set out in the Officer’s report.
Any Alternative Options Considered and Rejected
Not applicable.
Scrutiny
Considerations
The Committee unanimously resolved to endorse the recommendations.
The Executive Councillor
approved the recommendations.
Conflicts of Interest Declared by the Executive Councillor (and any
Dispensations Granted)
No conflicts of interest
were declared by the Executive Councillor.
Lead officer: Allison Conder
To allocate £113,185 of Communities S106 funds to the Junction for delivery of Community use projects within the venue.
Decision Maker: Executive Councillor for Open Spaces and City Services
Decision published: 28/10/2022
Effective from: 30/06/2022
Decision:
Matter for
Decision
The Officer’s report
proposed to provide a grant to The Junction towards its £120,000 project (which
is ready to implemented) to improve its community facilities for use by local
groups and residents beyond its function as an arts and music venue. This would
be funded primarily from specific S106 developer contributions (aimed at
mitigating the impact of development) which already stipulate improvements to
community facilities at The Junction as their purpose. The funding will provide
a range of adaptations to the ground and first floors within the J2 building at
the Junction to provide enhanced meeting areas, storage, and furniture suitable
for a range of community use activities and public use within The Junction.
Decision of Executive Councillor for Open Spaces, Food
Justice and Community Development
Allocate £113,185 of S106
community facilities funding (as detailed in financial implications in
paragraphs 4.1 to 4.3, subject to business case approval and a community use
agreement), as a grant to The Junction towards its improvement project to
provide enhanced and furnished meeting areas and associated storage space at
its J2 building.
Reason for the Decision
As set out in the Officer’s report.
Any Alternative Options Considered and Rejected
Not applicable.
Scrutiny
Considerations
The Committee unanimously resolved to endorse the recommendations.
The Executive Councillor
approved the recommendations.
Conflicts of Interest Declared by the Executive Councillor (and any
Dispensations Granted)
No conflicts of interest
were declared by the Executive Councillor.
Lead officer: Ian Ross
To consider, review and approve a new Biodiversity Strategy.
Decision Maker: Executive Councillor for Open Spaces and City Services
Decision published: 28/10/2022
Effective from: 30/06/2022
Decision:
Matter for
Decision
In July 2021 the Executive
Councillor for Open Spaces, Sustainable Food and Community Wellbeing approved use
of a draft Biodiversity Strategy for public consultation.
The Biodiversity Strategy
consultation, research and evaluations are now complete, and this report sets
out the summary of the findings in relation to the draft Biodiversity Strategy.
Decision of Executive Councillor for Open Spaces, Food
Justice and Community Development
i.
Noted the stated
ambitions and approve the adoption of the Biodiversity Strategy (2022 – 2030)
and accompanying Action Plan.
ii.
Allocated
responsibility for delivery and monitoring of the Action Plan to the Executive
Councillor for Environment, Climate Change and Biodiversity.
Reason for the Decision
As set out in the Officer’s report.
Any Alternative Options Considered and Rejected
Not applicable.
Scrutiny
Considerations
The Committee unanimously resolved to endorse the recommendations.
The Executive Councillor
approved the recommendations.
Conflicts of Interest Declared by the Executive Councillor (and any
Dispensations Granted)
No conflicts of interest
were declared by the Executive Councillor.
Lead officer: Alistair Wilson
To note the changes to the Community Grants programme proposed in Phase 1 of the Community Grants Review. To note the broader review work required in Phase 2 which will be developed alongside the ‘Our Cambridge’ transformation programme.
Decision Maker: Executive Councillor for Communities
Decision published: 28/10/2022
Effective from: 30/06/2022
Decision:
Matter for
Decision
The Community Grants
priorities are reviewed periodically to ensure they remain relevant and align
with the Councils Corporate Plan and wider objectives. Similarly, the Grant
procedures are reviewed annually as part of a continuous improvement process,
taking into account feedback from applicants and the experience of the Grants
Team.
As reported to Environment
and Scrutiny Committee on 27th January 2022, the focus on the next Grants
Review will be to ensure it aligns with the Council’s future priorities and
outcomes as identified through the ‘Our Cambridge’ transformation programme.
To enable the ‘Our
Cambridge’ work to develop and conversations with community groups to begin,
whilst at the same time allowing for continuous improvements as usual, a
two-phase Grants Review is proposed.
Decision of Executive Councillor for Equalities, Anti-Poverty
and Wellbeing
i.
Approved the changes to the Community Grants programme
proposed in Phase 1 of the Community Grants Review, namely:
a. The introduction of a ‘light
touch’ small grants application process for awards of £2,000 and under as set
out at point 4 of the Officer’s report.
ii.
Noted the broader
review work required in Phase 2 which will be developed alongside the ‘Our
Cambridge’ transformation programme.
Reason for the Decision
As set out in the Officer’s report.
Any Alternative Options Considered and Rejected
Not applicable.
Scrutiny
Considerations
The Committee unanimously resolved to endorse the recommendations.
The Executive Councillor
approved the recommendations.
Conflicts of Interest Declared by the Executive Councillor (and any
Dispensations Granted)
No conflicts of interest
were declared by the Executive Councillor.
Lead officer: Julie Cornwell
To note the progress in delivering actions to reduce poverty in Cambridge during 2021/22. To approve the extension of the current Anti-Poverty Strategy to 31 March 2024
Decision Maker: Executive Councillor for Communities
Decision published: 28/10/2022
Effective from: 30/06/2022
Decision:
Matter for
Decision
The Officer’s report
provided an update on delivery of key actions in the Council’s third
Anti-Poverty Strategy, which covers the period 2020-2023. During 2021/22 the
Council has delivered a range of planned actions to help address a range of
issues associated with poverty, including low pay, debt, food poverty, fuel
poverty, digital inclusion, skills, employment, housing affordability,
homelessness, and poor health outcomes.
Decision of Executive Councillor for Equalities, Anti-Poverty
and Wellbeing
i.
Noted the progress in delivering
actions to reduce poverty in Cambridge during 2021/22.
ii.
Agreed to extend the end date of
the existing Anti-Poverty Strategy from March 2023 to March 2024.
Reason for the Decision
As set out in the Officer’s report.
Any Alternative Options Considered and Rejected
Not applicable.
Scrutiny
Considerations
In response to questions, the Strategy and Partnerships Manager stated
that:
Although there was no proposal to adopt the socio-economic duty, the
strategy was developing an on-going range of approaches to tackle the current
cost of living emergency. The Council’s
equalities impact assessment is being adapted to take into account the
socio-economic impact of the council’s policies and actions.
There will be on-going updates for Members on the impact of the cost of
living crisis including the heating/housing issues which will be faced this
winter.
The Committee unanimously resolved to endorse the recommendations.
The Executive Councillor
approved the recommendations.
Conflicts of Interest Declared by the Executive Councillor (and any
Dispensations Granted)
No conflicts of interest
were declared by the Executive Councillor.
Lead officer: David Kidston
To note progress in delivering actions identified in the Single Equality Scheme during 2021/22. To approve new equalities actions identified for delivery in 2022/23 as part of the scheme.
Decision Maker: Executive Councillor for Communities
Decision published: 28/10/2022
Effective from: 30/06/2022
Decision:
Matter for
Decision
The current Single Equality
Scheme (SES) covers the period from 2021 to 2024. The council produced the SES in
order to set equality objectives and therefore to ensure transparency and
assist in the performance of its Public Sector Equality Duty (Section 149 of
the Equality Act 2010).
The Officer’s report
presented information to demonstrate compliance with the Public Sector Equality
Duty by providing an update on progress in delivering key actions set out in
the SES for 2021/22. It also proposes some new actions.
Decision of Executive Councillor for Equalities, Anti-Poverty
and Wellbeing
i.
Noted the progress in delivering
equalities actions during 2021/22.
ii.
Approved the new actions proposed
for delivery during 2022/23 (see point 3.5 in the Officer’s report).
Reason for the Decision
As set out in the Officer’s report.
Any Alternative Options Considered and Rejected
Not applicable.
Scrutiny
Considerations
The Strategy and Partnerships replied to questions from Members:
Work on period poverty in 2021 had led to
sanitary products being available at all council community centres.
Face to face customer interaction at the
customer service centre had reduced since re-opening compared to pre-pandemic
numbers, the officer was still awaiting the full detail from officer colleagues
and would provide it to the committee after the meeting.
A number of information questions will
require clarification with officer colleagues following the meeting on
consultation on female rough sleepers, Open Spaces Forum, Ask Angela.
The GRT accommodation needs assessment work
is still at a research stage, and the work is led by South Cambridgeshire
District Council and there is no date as yet for this to be presented to
Members.
The Committee unanimously resolved to endorse the recommendations.
The Executive Councillor
approved the recommendations.
Conflicts of Interest Declared by the Executive Councillor (and any
Dispensations Granted)
No conflicts of interest
were declared by the Executive Councillor.
Lead officer: David Kidston