A Cambridge City Council website

Cambridge City Council

Council and democracy

Home > Council and Democracy > Issue

Issue - decisions

Community Right to Challenge under the Localism Act

10/08/2012 - Community Right to Challenge under the Localism Act

Matter for Decision: The report set out a proposed process for responding to Expressions of Interest (EOIs) from relevant bodies. There is limited scope for local flexibility in implementing the Right to Challenge, other than in setting a ‘window’ when the authority will accept the submission of EOIs. It was therefore recommended that the Council adopts an annual window in June and July, commencing in 2013. 

 

Decision of the Leader:

 

The Leader resolved to:

 

        i.            Approve the process set out at Appendix 2 of the officer’s report for responding to Expressions of Interest under the Right to Challenge.

 

      ii.            Agree an annual window in June and July for accepting submission of Expressions of Interest under the Right to Challenge, commencing in June 2013.

 

Reasons for the Decision: As set out in the officer’s report

 

Any alternative options considered and rejected: As set out in the officer’s report

 

Scrutiny Considerations

 

The committee received a report from the Strategy and Partnerships Manager

 

In response to member’s questions the Strategy and Partnerships Manager confirmed the following:

 

        i.            The Council would only accept an Expression of Interest (EIO) from a credible provider that was in a position to undertake the work to the required standard.

      ii.            If the Council accepts an EOI it must run an open procurement process, which the challenging body can participate in, alongside other organisations including private companies.

    iii.            The decision to allocate an annual window in June and July was based on the need to align with existing budgetary, procurement and decision-making cycles.

 

The Scrutiny Committee considered and approved the recommendations by 4 votes to 0.

 

The Leader approved the recommendations.