Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Issue
Matter for
Decision
The purpose of the report was to update members of a review of the
existing Storage in Communal Areas - Zero Tolerance Policy and sought approval
to implement proposed changes to the policy. This includes a proposal to change
the title to ‘Fire Safety in Communal Areas Policy’.
Decision
of Executive Councillor for Housing
ii.
Support officers of the Council in enforcing the revised
policy.
Reason for the Decision
As set out in the
Officer’s report.
Any Alternative
Options Considered and Rejected
Not applicable.
Scrutiny
Considerations
The Committee received
a report from the Housing Services Manager.
The Committee
noted that an Equality Impact Assessment was published and circulated to the
Committee in advance of the meeting.
The Housing Services Manager said the following in response to Members’
questions:
i.
Noted concerns raised about the impact of the new
policy on resources (timescales / staff etc). Discussions had taken place with
the Streets and Open Spaces Team and no concerns regarding the impact on
resources had been raised.
ii.
Noted that some council properties were managed by
a Management Company and confirmed that if the proposed Fire Safety in Communal
Areas Policy was approved, officers would work with Management Companies to
align their policies.
iii.
Officers would investigate concerns raised about
storing mobility scooters in passageways and the impact on fire exit routes.
iv.
The Council (as a landlord) had a legal duty to
ensure that exit routes were clear and safe in the event of an emergency.
Officers undertook inspections and produced a quarterly report. Any patterns /
issues would be identified following these reports. Noted that immediate risks
included flammable liquids and motorcycles and that secondary risks included
bicycles and plants which could cause obstructions in smoke filled areas where
visibility could be reduced. The Council would undertake a proportionate approach
in applying and enforcing the Policy.
The Committee resolved by 11 votes to 0
with 2 abstentions to endorse the recommendations.
The Executive Councillor
approved the recommendations.
Conflicts of Interest
Declared by the Executive Councillor (and any Dispensations Granted)
No conflicts of interest
were declared by the Executive Councillor.