Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Issue
Matter for
Decision
Following a S106 agreement
made on 11th Sep 2013, the University of Cambridge and Council established a trust
to run Storey’s Field Community Centre.
The centre opened to the
public in February 2018, and the operating model was originally intended to be
direct management by Storey’s Field Community Trust. Since June 2016 the
Council has operated the centre under a contract for services with the Trust.
It was always the Council’s intention this would be a medium-term arrangement,
to support Trustees in the process of recruiting suitable staff, and
establishing the centre programme.
At the request of Storey’s
Field Community Trust, the council’s contract for services has been extended
several times since 2016, to enable the Trust to undertake a review of the
centre’s future direction, and to complete an open procurement process to appoint
a new operator. The tender process was completed in July 2022, but was not
successful.
With the centre team and
programme now successfully established, Cambridge University and the Council
consider that there is potential for efficiencies in operations and decision
making, and the future strategic success of the centre, by revising the current
governance model.
Options appraisal work has
been completed by Cambridge University and the Council as part of developing a
jointly agreed proposal for future governance, and this identified a preferred
position for both organisations. This involved dissolving the Trust and
removing the Council from the governance of the centre. Cambridge University,
as the building owner, would then assume full responsibility for future
investment and the strategy for overseeing management and operation of the
centre within the Estates Division, and under the purview of the Property
Board. This may be direct management or contracting this service out.
The Councils current
contract for services would end 31st March 2024, and a further extension was
required until 31st March 2025, to give sufficient time to complete the legal
steps required to dissolve the Trust and to ensure a smooth transition to the new
governance arrangements. Specifically, a new Community Use Agreement will be
needed to replace the existing Trust documentation and set out the long-term
commitment of Cambridge University to the delivery of community development
activity at Storey’s Field Centre.
Decision
of Executive Councillor for Communities
ii.
Agreed to simplify existing
governance arrangements by dissolving and winding-up Storeys Field Community
Trust, working jointly to do so with Cambridge University. Cambridge University
may need to retain the trust for tax purposes in which case they will assume
complete responsibilities for any governance structure.
iii.
Agreed to Cambridge University
assuming responsibility for management, oversight and meeting any operational
deficit for Storey’s Field Centre, following dissolution of Storey’s Field
Community Trust.
iv.
Delegated responsibility to the
Director of Communities, in consultation with the Chair and Spokes of
Environment and Communities Scrutiny Committee, to approve an updated Community
Use Agreement that reflects the revised governance arrangements.
v.
Delegated responsibility to the
Director of Communities to ensure a smooth transition and handover of
management of the centre to Cambridge University.
Reason for the Decision
As set out in the Officer’s report.
Any Alternative Options Considered and Rejected
Not applicable.
Scrutiny
Considerations
The Committee received a report from the Strategic Project Manager.
The Strategic Project Manager said the following in response to Members’
questions:
i.
Revised terms of reference were expected from the
University setting out details of community use requirements for the centre in
perpetuity eg the amount of time the centre was available for community use
hire.
ii.
The City Council would monitor s106 community use
terms. This would be an ongoing role.
The Committee unanimously resolved to endorse the recommendations.
The Executive Councillor approved the recommendations.
Conflicts of Interest Declared by the Executive Councillor (and any
Dispensations Granted)
No conflicts of interest
were declared by the Executive Councillor.