Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Issue
The Council considered a complaint in relation to the
management of land using the Councils complaints procedure. This complaint
could not be resolved at Stage 2 of our process, and the complainant referred
the matter to the Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman (LGO).
The LGO investigated the
complaint covering a range of issues regarding City Council public space at
Highfields Tree Belt and found there was fault by the Council with two of the
areas which caused the complainant injustice.
The LGO found the Council
at fault in how it kept its records for its biodiversity assessments and
inspections even when it does not identify and substantive issues or risks and
in respect of security of the locked access to the site.
The LGO provided an agreed
action for the council to demonstrate it had changed its record keeping
procedures by 17th May 2023.
The LGO had subsequently
been provided with evidence that the action had been completed and had formally
accepted that the identified service improvement actions, offered by the
Council to the complainant, have been fully actioned by the Council.
Decision
of Executive Councillor for Open Spaces and City Services
Noted the findings of the
Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman in respect of this case and the
actions taken by the Council in response to these findings.
Reason for the Decision
As set out in the Officer’s report.
Any Alternative Options Considered and Rejected
Not applicable.
Scrutiny
Considerations
The committee made no comments in response to the report from the Group
Operations Manager.
The Committee unanimously resolved to note the report.
The Executive Councillor approved the recommendations.
Conflicts of Interest Declared by the Executive Councillor (and any
Dispensations Granted)
No conflicts of interest
were declared by the Executive Councillor.