Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Issue
Matter for
Decision
The Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014 (“2014 Act”) gave
local authorities the power to make Public Space Protection Orders (PSPOs).
The Cambridge City Council
Mill Road Cemetery, Petersfield Green and the front garden at Ditchburn Place, Cambridge
Public Spaces Protection Order 2016 was due to lapse on 31st May 2023. This
PSPO prohibited consuming alcohol or having an open container of alcohol in
possession within the areas shown shaded red on the Order (see Appendix A-C of
the Officer’s report). At the time the PSPO was introduced, these areas were
the focus of complaints for anti-social drinking of alcohol.
Before the orders lapse,
Cambridge City Council must decide to either: a) extend the period of the order
for up to three years, b) vary the order or c) discharge the order.
As per legislation this
decision should be informed by consultation with:
i.
The Police and Crime Commissioner,
ii.
Cambridgeshire Constabulary (the local
policing body),
iii.
Relevant community representatives,
iv.
Ward Councillors, and
v.
The owner/occupier of land the PSPO
covers.
In
addition to these groups, the Council sought the views of local people via the
Council’s Citizen Lab consultation platform. 61 people completed the
consultation. The consultation questions could be found in Appendix D of the
Officer’s report.
The
Council also collaborated with the University of Cambridge whose Geography
students completed 300 in-person surveys with the public on ASB and public
spaces.
The
evidence and consultation results have been used to inform consideration about
whether to a) renew the PSPO; b) vary it; or c) discharge it and adopt a new
approach to addressing alcohol related ASB. The report highlighted why options
a) and b) were not recommended and how option c) is proposed to be implemented,
as summarised in 3.18 of the Officer’s report.
Decision
of Executive Councillor for Recovery, Employment and Community Safety
Discharged
the PSPO and adopted a new approach to addressing alcohol related ASB.
The
new approach would involve:
i.
A proactive
and preventative council presence on the current PSPO sites through weekly
patrols.
ii.
Better engagement and education
with street drinkers, support services and local interest groups.
iii.
A greater ability to gather
intelligence on alcohol related ASB, which will be used
as evidence for enforcement action, such as Criminal Behaviour Orders.
Discharge
was recommended on the grounds of:
iv.
A significant
reduction in reports of anti-social drinking of alcohol on the sites covered by
the PSPO. In 2022, the police and council received only 2 reports each.
v.
Low frequency of
incidents identified in the consultation. 36 consultation respondents had
witnessed anti-social drinking in the past 12 months. Of these who had
witnessed anti-social drinking, almost half witnessed this 10 times or less (an
average of less than once per month).
vi.
65% (194 of 300)
respondents to the University of Cambridge’s in person surveys did not list
alcohol as a core problem facing public spaces in Cambridge.
vii.
80% of consultation
respondents (49 people) supported the Council and Police managing anti-social
drinking of alcohol as outlined in 2.1 – 2.3 of the Officer’s report.
Reason for the Decision
As set out in the Officer’s report.
Any Alternative Options Considered and Rejected
Not applicable.
Scrutiny
Considerations
The Committee received a report from the Community Safety Manager.
The Committee made the following comments in response to the report:
i.
Welcomed a joined up approach with partners to address
street drinking, not just a punitive approach.
ii.
Queried work the Street Life Officer had
undertaken.
The Community Safety Manager said the following in response to Members’
questions:
i.
The Street Life Officer engaged with street
drinkers, and they supported proposals in the Officer’s report.
ii.
Officers regularly engaged with the street life
community and their support services such as Jimmy’s (shelter).
The Committee unanimously resolved to endorse the recommendation.
The Executive Councillor
approved the recommendations.
Conflicts of Interest Declared by the Executive Councillor (and any
Dispensations Granted)
No conflicts of interest
were declared by the Executive Councillor.