Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Issue
Matter for Decision
On 27 January 2022 the Executive Councillor for Open Spaces, Sustainable
Food & Community Wellbeing (after scrutiny) approved a
Herbicide Reduction Plan (HRP), which included Newnham and Arbury as the two
herbicide free wards and the introduction of up to 12 herbicide free streets.
The Council’s declaration of a Biodiversity Emergency (18th July 2019)
included a commitment to reducing and removing the need to use herbicides on
highway verges, roads, and pavements, and to find viable and effective alternatives,
and this was reflected in the development and application of the HRP.
The Council’s passing of a Herbicide Motion
(ref. 21/32/CNlc - 22nd July 2021) included a
commitment to undertake a range of tasks and actions to reduce the reliance on
herbicide, as a means of managing unwanted vegetation on public property asset
within the city.
The Officer’s report gave updates on the work completed on the HRP to
date, including an evaluation of the two herbicide free wards and the herbicide
free street scheme; and made recommendations on the further reduction in the
use of herbicides in the city’s public realm.
Decision
of Executive Councillor for Open Spaces, Food Justice & Community
Development
i.
Approved the expansion of the
Herbicide Reduction Plan to include two additional herbicide free wards for
2023 - West Chesterton and Trumpington, (and continuation with Newnham and
Arbury herbicide free wards from 2022).
ii.
Approved the continuation and
further development of the ‘Happy Bee Street Scheme’.
iii.
Noted the decision of the County
Council on their use of herbicides in the city and to assist them with their new
approach (paragraphs 3.2 to 3.4 of the Officer’s report).
iv.
Noted the decision of the County
Council to change the grass cutting specifications in the city (paragraphs 3.5
to 3.7 of the Officer’s report).
v.
Supported the development of a
collaborative communication plan as detailed in Section 5 of the Officer’s
report.
Reason for the Decision
As set out in the Officer’s report.
Any Alternative Options Considered and Rejected
Not applicable.
Scrutiny
Considerations
The Committee received a report from the Development Manager, Streets & Open Spaces.
The Development Manager said the following in response to Members’
questions:
i.
Complaints referred to the:
a.
Early stage of the trial where herbicide was
applied by a third party who was unaware of the herbicide free trial.
b.
Appearance of the area when people were unaware the
trial was underway and thought the area was untidy.
ii.
The scheme showed how much potential the Happy Bee
scheme had for the Council. There was interest in more streets joining the
scheme. The Council would provide appropriate personal protective equipment to
participants.
iii.
There was a risk of accessibility around the city
as wet vegetation could block/overhang pavements in open spaces causing
hazards. Weeds in gutters were another issue as channels needed to be kept
clear. The City Council was working with the County Council to keep channels
clear.
iv.
A Working Group had looked at rolling out the
herbicide free trial across all wards, but selected just two, due to conditions
such as road surfaces. The trial was limited to two wards to avoid negative
impact around peoples’ homes eg perception of lack of
maintenance which may lead to fly tipping.
v.
Referred to Appendices A and B in the Officer’s
report for details of actions taken and their effectiveness.
vi.
The trial would determine how to proceed in other
areas. Some DEFRA guidance was expected in 2024.
The Committee resolved by 6
votes to 0 with 2 abstentions to endorse the recommendations.
The Executive Councillor approved
the recommendations.
Conflicts of Interest Declared by the Executive Councillor (and any
Dispensations Granted)
No conflicts of interest
were declared by the Executive Councillor.