Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Issue
Matter for
Decision
The Council has a legal
duty to investigate statutory nuisance within its area under the Environmental
Protection Act 1990. However, the law does not specify how to exercise this
duty, it was therefore the responsibility of each Local Authority to establish
its own procedures for investigating complaints of noise that may amount to
statutory nuisance.
At this committee on 27th January 2022, the
Executive Councillor noted the results of the pro-active and planned Out of
Hours Noise Service trial that was conducted between 1st October – 31st
December 2021 and approved the adoption of this proactive and planned service
approach on a permanent basis supported by use of evidence gathering technologies
and equipment.
It was
also agreed by the Executive Councillor that a further report on progress of
Environmental Services new approach to investigating noise complaints would be
brought to committee detailing further evaluation of the impact of the Council’s
move from a reactive Out of Hours Noise Service to one which uses a combination
of technology and planned use of officer time.
Decision of
Executive Councillor for Climate Change, Environment and City Centre
Noted
the update report on the Councils new approach on investigating noise
complaints.
Reason for the Decision
As set out in the Officer’s report.
Any Alternative Options Considered and Rejected
Not applicable.
Scrutiny
Considerations
The Committee received a report from the Team Manager - Residential, Environmental Services.
The Team Manager - Residential, Environmental Services said the
following in response to Members’ questions:
i.
No formal or informal complaints had been received
about the new approach to investigating noise complaints.
ii.
Officers provided support to complainants when they
logged issues. Section 3.10 of the Officer’s report listed outcomes of noise
complaints received.
iii.
A customer satisfaction survey was launched on-line
from 1 October 2022.
iv.
The old system was a reactive approach to out of
hours noise complaints. Now the City Council could be proactive on a
case-by-case basis. Technology allowed the City Council to quickly intervene
for repeated issues. Officers could plan what visits were required, and when,
so they could witness issues as they occurred.
v.
The number of officer visits had decreased as they
could be targeted to where/when needed.
vi.
The City Council could not investigate one-off
issues, only repeated ones. Visiting on a reactive basis (old system) was not a
good use of City Council resources as some issues were outside the Council’s
remit. Resources could be better directed and callers directed to appropriate
sources of help under the new system (if the City Council was unable to help).
The Committee unanimously resolved to endorse the recommendation.
The Executive Councillor
approved the recommendation.
Conflicts of Interest Declared by the Executive Councillor (and any
Dispensations Granted)
No conflicts of interest
were declared by the Executive Councillor.