Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Issue
Matter for Decision
The report referred to the Authority Monitoring Report (AMR)
for Greater Cambridge 2020-2021.
Decision of the Executive Councillor for Planning Policy
and Transport.
i.
Agreed the Cambridge City Council and South
Cambridgeshire District Council - Authority Monitoring Report for Greater
Cambridge 2020-2021 (included as Appendix A of the Officer’s report) for
publication on the Councils’ websites.
ii.
Delegated any further minor editing changes to
the Cambridge City Council and South Cambridgeshire District Council -
Authority Monitoring Report for Greater Cambridge 2020-2021 to the Joint
Director of Planning and Economic Development, in consultation with the
Executive Councillor for Planning Policy and Transport, and the Chair and
Spokes for the Planning Policy and Transport Scrutiny Committee, including the
final designed version of Appendix 3.
Reason for the Decision
As set out in the Officer’s report.
Any Alternative Options Considered and Rejected
Not applicable.
Scrutiny Considerations
The Committee received a report from the Senior Policy
Planner and Principal Planning Policy Officer who in response to Members’
questions said the following:
i.
The main reason the total number of completions
of affordable housing was lower than 40% was that the policy only requires 40%
affordable homes on schemes of 15 dwellings or more, a lower requirement of 25%
affordable homes applies to schemes of 10-14 dwellings, and there is no
requirement for affordable housing on sites with 10 dwellings or less in
accordance with the National Planning Policy Framework.
ii.
It is important to differentiate between
permissions and completions when looking at the affordable housing data. A
planning permission that secures 40% affordable homes may not complete 40%
affordable homes each year, instead the proportion of affordable homes
completed on a development will vary each year.
iii.
Out of the 850 completions so far at the
Eddington site, 686 were affordable, therefore currently at 81% affordable
homes. The policy is for 50% affordable homes on this development, and
therefore this is what we would expect to see when the scheme is completed.
iv.
The reference to life expectancy in the city was
looked at in terms of general impacts of our policies and therefore is
considered at district level.
v.
The AMR currently looks at delivery of new
developments in terms of new homes and new buildings, but can look to include
wider information in future, such as delivery of other infrastructure like the
bus route through Darwin Green. Also, in terms of transport schemes, the AMR
does not provide an update on all schemes, it just highlights those where
progress has been made in the monitoring year, which is why the Greater
Cambridge Partnership Milton Road Scheme has not been specifically mentioned.
vi.
With regards to the local centres with below 50%
retail, the 6 centres had been referenced on p298 of the Officer’s report.
vii.
The purpose of the AMR is to look backwards and
therefore reports up to April 2021. There is also now an obligation to report
on s106 outcomes each year. Neither would pick up outstanding works, but this
was something that could be looked at for future reporting.
The Committee
The Committee unanimously endorsed the Officers
recommendations.
The Executive Councillor for Planning Policy and Transport
approved the recommendations.
Conflicts of Interest Declared by the Executive
Councillor (and any Dispensations Granted)