Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Issue
CAMBRIDGE CITY
COUNCIL
Record of Executive Decision
Cambridge south station CONSULTATION RESPONSE |
Decision of: |
Councillor
Thornburrow Executive Councillor, Planning Policy and Transport |
||
Reference: |
21/URGENCY/P&T/12 |
||
Date of
decision: |
2 August 2021 |
Published: |
3 August 2021 |
Decision Type: |
Non Key |
||
Matter for
Decision: |
The purpose of this
decision is to approved the Council’s response to
the consultation on the application by Network Rail made under the Transport
and Works Act 1992 for the Cambridge South Infrastructure Enhancements scheme
(including the new Cambridge South Station) and request for deemed planning
consent submitted to the Secretary of State for Transport. The proposed
response is attached to this report.
In summary, the response proposes that the Council supports the scheme
in principle, however requests additional information
is submitted by the applicant for the Council to review and comment on before
the application, and makes recommendations for replacement or additional
conditions. |
||
Why the decision had to be made (and any
alternative options): |
Cambridge City Council are a statutory
consultee and the consultation deadline ends on 2 August 2021. Early response
to this consultation would be appreciated |
||
The
Executive Councillor’s decision(s): |
To submit the
consultation response as drafted |
||
Reasons for the decision: |
In
order to represent the views and concerns of the City Council and ensure that
these are considered in the forthcoming inquiry |
||
Scrutiny consideration: |
The Chair and Spokespersons of Planning and
Transport Scrutiny Committee were consulted
prior to the action being authorised on 2 August 2021. |
||
Report: |
Consultation response: Document Out of Cycle Decision: Response to Cambridge
South Station Consultation Response - Cambridge Council. |
||
Conflicts
of interest: |
None known. |
||
Comments: |
Councillor S.Davies
– Felt it wasn’t possible to adapt the response to adequately reflect
concerns about the fundamental problems with the project as it seemed to be
written from a 'planning compliance' mindset. Would be supporting Smarter
Cambridge Transport's objection to the proposal and I would encouraging the other Green and Independent Group members
to adopt the same stance. |