Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Issue
Matter for
Decision
The Officer’s report
provided an update on progress so far in 2021 on the 2021/22 actions of the
Council’s Climate Change Strategy 2021-26. As part of this, the report includes
an update on progress in implementing the projects to reduce our direct carbon
emissions from our corporate buildings, fleet vehicles and business travel as
detailed in the Council’s Carbon Management Plan 2021-26.
The Officer’s report also
provides an update on:
·
The
council’s Greenhouse Gas Emissions for 2020/21
·
UK100’s
Net Zero Pledge as in Appendix C
Decision
of Executive Councillor for Climate Change, Environment and City Centre
i.
Noted the progress achieved in the
first five months of 2021/22 in implementing the actions in the Climate Change
Strategy and Carbon Management Plan.
ii.
Approved the updated Climate
Change Strategy action plan presented in Appendix A of the Officer’s report.
iii.
Agreed to sign the UK100’s new Net
Zero Pledge as detailed at Appendix C of the Officer’s report.
Reason for the Decision
As set out in the Officer’s report.
Any Alternative Options Considered and Rejected
Not applicable.
Scrutiny
Considerations
The Committee received a report from the Strategy
and Partnerships Manager.
The Strategy and Partnerships Manager said the following in response to
Members’ questions:
i.
The Council had approximately 7,000 properties. It
was looking at measures to retrofit these to net zero. Residential and commercial
properties with the lowest energy efficiency performance would be targeted
first.
ii.
The City Council has lower emissions when
benchmarked against neighbouring and similar authorities.
iii.
Climate Change Strategies of similar authorities
have been reviewed to see if the City Council can learn from them.
iv.
The Environmental Services Team were reviewing the
electric vehicle charger trial:
a.
Rapid chargers that took 1 hour.
b.
Fast chargers that took 2-7 hours.
c.
Capacity/resources would determine if/where
chargers could be placed in other wards after the trial. The City Council would
have to work with power networks and Central Government to implement this, the
City Council could not do work on its own.
d.
The pilot would be reviewed after March 2022. The
Council would then decide if it would bid for more funding to take action.
e.
The following were needed in order to put in
chargers:
1.
Power.
2.
Demand for chargers.
3.
Parking spaces.
v.
Traffic regulation orders were in place in carparks
to ensure only electric vehicles used spaces where chargers were available.
Pulse were the company awarded the contract to install and maintain these.
vi.
A report on Corn Exchange boilers would be brought
to committee in March 2022. Gas boilers were installed as the previous ones
were at request of failure. The new boilers were more efficient and would have
20% lower emissions.
vii.
The Council Environmental Awareness e-learning
course could be promoted as good practice to other organisations.
Councillor Copley said the City Council could better inform residents of
the nature of the climate change emergency and how Central Government needed to
take action. Personal action was not enough to effect change. For example,
housing was at risk of flooding. The City Council could explain that residents
could lobby Central Government direct.
The Executive Councillor for Climate Change, Environment and City Centre
replied:
i.
Agreed that Central Government should take action.
The City Council was trying to engage residents on how to lobby Central
Government, for example, through Cambridge Matters. Welcomed ideas on how to do
more.
ii.
There were 2 electric vehicle charging point
projects:
a.
One with the County Council for on-street parking.
Another separate one for City Council carparks.
b.
There had been issues regarding infrastructure in
place to support electric vehicle charging.
iii.
The intention was to insulate all council homes as
per the aims of Insulate Britain. It was unclear if this could be achieved by
2025. Sufficient funding from Central Government and a skilled workforce were
required to do this.
The Committee unanimously resolved to endorse the recommendations.
The Executive Councillor
approved the recommendations.
Conflicts of Interest Declared by the Executive Councillor (and any
Dispensations Granted)
No conflicts of interest
were declared by the Executive Councillor.