Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Issue
Matter for
Decision
The purpose of the report
was to inform Cambridge City Council’s response to the current A428 Black Cat
to Caxton Gibbet Detailed Alignment consultation, by setting out response
points to inform discussion and agreement of key issues to inform a full response
being agreed by the Executive Councillor in an out of
cycle decision in consultation with Chair and Spokes and submitted
ahead of the consultation deadline.
Decision
of Executive Councilor for Transport and Community Safety.
i.
Noted the key response points to the A428 Black Cat to Caxton Gibbet
Preferred Route consultation.
ii.
Agreed the wording of a final joint response and/or any individual response
published through an out of cycle decision, in consultation with Chair and
Spokes.
Reason for the Decision
As set out in the
Officer’s report.
Any Alternative
Options Considered and Rejected
Not applicable.
Scrutiny
Considerations
The Committee
received a report from the Principal Planning Policy Officer.
The report set out
key response points for discussion, to be refined following the meeting.
Discussion with South Cambridgeshire District Council suggests that there is
potential to include Cambridge’s comments within a joint response, potentially
also with other partners.
In response to Member’s comments and questions the Principal Planning
Policy Officer said the following:
i.
The preferred choice for the Oxford to Cambridge
arc would go either via Cambourne or Bassingbourn entering Cambridge via the
south.
ii.
The draft response would expand on the different
projects undertaken by the Greater Cambridge Partnership schemes and the impact
on the city acknowledged.
Following a general discussion the Committee
noted the critical importance of the A428 being considered as part of a
coherently planned local and regional transport network, that of necessity
should interact and integrate with capacity being provided elsewhere.
The Committee unanimously endorsed
the Officer recommendations
The Executive Councillor approved the recommendations.
Conflicts of Interest
Declared by the Executive Councillor (and any
Dispensations Granted)
No conflicts of interest were
declared by the Executive Councillor.