Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Issue
This item was Chaired by Councillor Todd-Jones (Committee Chair)
Matter for
Decision
The proposed Cambridgeshire Repairs and Adaptations Policy was
aimed at helping people to live safely and independently at home. It stemmed
from requirements for housing, health and social care services to work more
closely together to enable people to manage their own health and wellbeing, and
live independently in their communities for as long as possible.
It would replace Cambridge City
Council’s current Grants & Loans Policy. It proposes four categories of
financial assistance for eligible residents, together with the option to fund
additional partnership projects or other services to meet the objectives of the
policy.
Decision
of Executive Councillor for Housing
i.
Approved the draft Adaptations &
Repairs Policy shown at Appendix A of the report; and
ii.
Delegated authority to the Strategic
Director to make decisions - in consultation with the Executive Councillor,
Chair & Vice Chair of Housing Scrutiny Committee, and Housing Opposition
Spokesperson - around whether to convert capital Disabled Facilities Grant
(DFC) to revenue, should the DFG grant conditions allow; to fund partnership
projects or other services to meet the objectives of the draft Adaptations
& Repairs Policy shown at Appendix A of the report.
Reason for the Decision
As set out in the Officer’s report.
Any Alternative Options Considered and Rejected
Not applicable.
Scrutiny
Considerations
The Committee received a report from the Housing Strategy Manager.
The Committee welcomed the report.
The Committee resolved by 5 votes to 0 to endorse the recommendations.
The Executive Councillor approved
the recommendations.
19/22/HSC
Update on the Programme to
Build New Council Homes Funded Through the Combined Authority
This item was Chaired by Councillor Todd-Jones (Committee Chair)
Matter for
Decision
The report
provided an update on the programme to deliver 500
Council homes with funding from the Combined Authority.
Decision
of Executive Councillor for Housing
i.
Noted the continued progress on the delivery of the
Combined Authority programme.
ii.
Noted the funding structure for the Combined Authority
programme.
Reason for the Decision
As set out in the Officer’s report.
Any Alternative Options Considered and Rejected
Not applicable.
Scrutiny
Considerations
The Committee received a report from the Head of Housing
Development Agency.
The Head of Housing Development Agency said the following in response to Members’
questions:
i.
Confirmed that the number of fully adapted
properties to be delivered exceeds the initial targets. The remaining
properties in the programme would be built to lifetime’s homes standards and
would be adapted at a future date to suit the occupant’s needs.
ii.
Hill was a respected and trusted delivery partner
who shared the council’s high standards.
iii.
The majority of the properties in the pipeline
would be 1 and 2 bedroom units as this had previously been identified as the
type of properties in highest demand. Larger properties could be delivered on
some schemes subject to evidence of demand.
Councillor McGerty questioned why the small site on the corner of Hill’s
Avenue had not been included in the programme. Office’s confirmed that the
estimated development cost per unit cost was too high. It was suggested that
the site could be used temporarily as a community garden as it was currently an
eyesore. The Strategic Director (SH) undertook to investigate this option.
The Committee resolved by 5 votes to 0 to endorse the recommendations.
The Executive Councillor
approved the recommendations.