Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Issue
The Committee received an application for full planning permission.
The application sought approval for demolition of the existing buildings
and redevelopment of the site to provide a replacement care home (Use Class C2)
arranged over three storeys together with associated car parking, landscaping
and amenity space
The Planner updated her report by referring to the amendment sheet. This
in turn was revised at committee (as shown in bold and struck through text):
Pre-Committee Amendments to Recommendation: The wording of
the travel plan condition has been amended from ‘prior to occupation’ to
‘within 6 months of first occupation of the building’ as the Travel Plan cannot
be finalised until staff are in place and have been interviewed.
15. Within 6 month of the first occupation
of the building, a Travel Plan shall be submitted to and approved in writing by
the Local Planning Authority. The Travel
Plan shall specify the methods to be used to discourage the use of the private
motor vehicle and the arrangements to encourage use of alternative sustainable
travel arrangements such as public transport, car sharing, cycling and walking.
The Travel Plan shall be implemented as approved upon the occupation of the development
and monitored in accordance with details to be agreed in writing by the Local
Planning Authority.
Reason: In the interests of encouraging
sustainable travel to and from the site (Cambridge Local Plan 2006, policies
8/2, 8/3 and 8/4).
The Committee received a representation in objection to the application
from a resident of Bullen Close.
The representation covered the following issues:
i.
The nursing home backs onto her
property. The application would replace a garden with a carpark where the two properties
adjoin.
ii.
Expressed concerns about:
a.
Light, noise and emission
pollution from the car park.
b.
The lack of a solid barrier
between her property and the large unmonitored car park. This would create
security issues.
c.
Loss of privacy and overlooking.
iii.
Requested (if planning permission
were granted):
a.
A secure traffic planning
condition.
b.
Controls over lighting in the car
park etc to mitigate the impact on neighbouring
properties.
c.
Redesigning (garden) screening so
that neighbours’ properties are not overlooked.
Mr Kearley (Applicant’s Agent) addressed the
Committee in support of the application.
Councillor Herbert (Coleridge Ward Councillor) addressed the Committee
about the application.
The representation covered the following issues:
i.
Referred to his representation on
P58 of the Officer’s report.
ii.
Expressed specific concern
regarding:
a.
Increased height and scale of
building would dominate neighbouring properties on Cherry Hinton Road and
Bullen Close.
1.
Suggested the new building would
be 6m from the boundary not 14m as per the Officer’s report.
2.
Neighbours felt this was an
overdevelopment of site and had general security concerns. The number of
nursing home residents would increase to 64.
3.
There appeared to be confusion in
the Officer’s report about the impact of the application on 428 and 430 Cherry
Hinton Road.
b.
Security of neighbouring property
(43 Bullen Close).
1.
Screening would be removed so
people could access 43 Bullen Close through the nursing home’s large unattended
carpark. Requested a solid boundary wall and security camera be installed as
part of planning conditions.
c.
The need to protect trees on the
nursing home property, particularly during building work.
1.
Requested condition 7 be amended to protect new and existing trees.
d.
The impact of the application on
existing nursing home residents. The Officer’s report only referred to new
residents.
1.
Queried why the existing building
would be demolished instead of renovated.
2.
Queried what information had been
given to existing residents about timescales and where they will be moved to.
Information had not been forthcoming from Care UK who managed the nursing home.
The Planner responded to points made in the representations:
i.
The security of 43 Bullen Close could be addressed
through Condition 6 which relates to boundary treatment. A security camera
could not be requested.
ii.
The Planning Department required details of
lighting to be submitted before occupation of the building through condition
14.
iii.
Condition 7 contained an error. It should refer to
new and existing trees. The Planner summarised revised wording for the
Committee.
iv.
The new building would be 14m from the boundary.
The ‘T’ shaped part of it would be 6m from the boundary.
v.
The new building would provide 63 bedrooms and
increase from the existing 58 bedrooms.
Councillor Thornburrow proposed amendments to the Officer’s
recommendation to include a condition requiring tree protection during
construction.
Councillor Blencowe proposed amendments to the Officer’s recommendation to
include conditions requiring:
i.
A carpark management and
monitoring plan.
ii.
A construction traffic
management plan.
The amendments were carried
nem con.
The Committee:
Resolved (by 8 votes to 1) to grant the
application for planning permission in accordance with the officer
recommendation, for the reasons set out in the officer report, and subject to
the conditions recommended by the officers; plus amendments to conditions 7 and
15, three new conditions regarding construction traffic management, car park management
and monitoring and tree protection.
7. If within 5 years of implementation of the
permission, any tree or shrub show on Drawing PL03 Rev E is removed, uprooted,
destroyed or dies or becomes, in the opinion of the Local Planning Authority
seriously damaged or defective, another tree or shrub of the same species and
size as that originally shown on the plan shall be planted at the same place,
unless the Local Planning Authority gives written consent to any variation.
Reason: To ensure the provision of
amenity afforded by the proper maintenance of existing and/or new landscape
features. (Cambridge Local Plan 2006 policies 3/4, 3/12 and 3/11)
15.
Within 6 month of the first occupation
of the building, a Travel Plan shall be submitted to and approved in writing by
the Local Planning Authority. The Travel
Plan shall specify the methods to be used to discourage the use of the private
motor vehicle and the arrangements to encourage use of alternative sustainable
travel arrangements such as public transport, car sharing, cycling and walking.
The Travel Plan shall be implemented as approved and monitored in accordance
with details to be agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority.
Reason: In the interests of
encouraging sustainable travel to and from the site (Cambridge Local Plan 2006,
policies 8/2, 8/3 and 8/4).
22. No demolition or construction shall commence
on site until a traffic management plan has been agreed in writing by the Local
Planning Authority. Works shall thereafter be in accordance with the approved
details.
Reason: in the
interests of highway safety in accordance with policy 8/2 of the Cambridge
Local Plan (2006)
23 Prior to the occupation of the replacement
care home a Car Park Management and Monitoring strategy shall be submitted to
and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. Management and
monitoring of the car park shall thereafter be in accordance with the approved
details.
Reason: to ensure the car park is management
in a way which would not adversely impact on the amenity of 43 Bullen Close
(Cambridge Local Plan 2006 policy 3/7).
24 Prior to the commencement of development a
site visit will be arranged with the City Council’s Tree Officer to agree on
tree protection measure for the protection of the retained trees on site, as
shown in Drawing PL03 Rev E, during construction. Details of the specification and position of
fencing, or any other measures to be taken for the protection of any trees from
damage during the course of development, shall be submitted to the local
planning authority for its written approval, and implemented in accordance with
that approval before any equipment, machinery or materials are brought onto the
site for the purpose of development (including demolition). The agreed means of
protection shall be retained on site until all equipment, and surplus materials
have been removed from the site. Nothing shall be stored or placed in any area
protected in accordance with this condition, and the ground levels within those
areas shall not be altered nor shall any excavation be made without the prior
written approval of the local planning authority.
Reason: To protect the visual amenity
of the area and to ensure the retention of the trees on the site. (Cambridge Local Plan 2006 policies 3/4, 3/11, 3/12 and 4/4).