Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Issue
The Committee received a report from the Enforcement Team Manager.
The report outlined an overview of City Council Refuse and Environment
and Streets and Open Spaces service activity relating to the geographical area
served by the South Area Committee. The
report identified the reactive and proactive service actions undertaken in the
previous quarter, including the requested priority targets, and reported back
on the recommended issues and associated actions. It also included key officer
contacts for the reporting of waste and refuse and public realm issues.
The following were suggestions for Members on what action could be
considered for priority within the South Area for the upcoming period:
Number |
Priority details |
1 |
Early morning,
daytime and weekend patrols for dog fouling on Cherry Hinton Recreation
Ground, Trumpington Recreation Ground and
Cherry Hinton Hall. |
2 |
Enforcement
targeted approach to areas where Addenbrookes site
joins residential areas such as Hills Road and Red Cross Lane and to work
with Addenbrookes to work towards the bus station
area being cleaned up. |
3 |
Enforcement to
work with the County Council, against utilities and companies that damage the
verge on Mowbray and Fendon Road. |
4 |
Enforcement
joint working and patrols to deal with littering from students of Long Road
Sixth Form in the areas of Long Road and Sedley
Taylor Road. |
5 |
Enforcement
patrols to deal with litter, abandoned vehicles and fly tipping in and around Teversham
Drift |
6 |
Enforcement action to deal with bins left on pavements in
Anstey Way. |
7 |
Enforcement
patrols to tackle fly tipping at the Anstey Way recycling centre |
The Committee discussed the following issues:
i.
Injunction papers affecting Hanover Court Garages.
Action
Point: Enforcement Team Manager to liaise with Councillor O’Connell about
distribution of injunction papers affecting Hanover Court Garages.
ii.
Clean up litter in alley ways around Long Road
Sixth Form College, Mowbray Road and Hulatt Road.
iii.
Clean up litter in hospital access road.
iv.
Damage to grass and trees on Fisher’s Lane caused
by cars parking on the grass.
Action Point: Enforcement Team Manager and Tree
Officers to visit green on Fisher’s Lane to inspect damage to grass and trees
caused by cars parking on the grass.
v.
Putting needle exchange information in Boots
(Cherry Hinton branch).
vi.
The need for secure locations for sharp bins. The
Police, Anti-Social Behaviour Team and Enforcement Officers were putting
injunctions in place to move people on if they used drugs.
vii.
Drug user support services were not open 24 hours
so were not always in place to help drug users.
viii.
Sufficient numbers of stewards needed to be in
place for the Cherry Hinton Lakes Open Day.
Action Point: Enforcement Team Manager to liaise
with Operations Co-ordinator (Community Engagement and Enforcement) to ensure
there are enough stewards at the Cherry Hinton Lakes open day in June.
ix.
Abandoned bikes.
x.
Abandoned shopping trolleys.
xi.
Community clean up days (P38 agenda pack) were
noted.
Mr Zammer asked when dog waste bins would be installed
in an area. The Enforcement Team Manager said this would occur once a
development was adopted by the local authority. It would then be assigned a dog
warden patrol.
Action
Point: Enforcement Team Manager to liaise with member of public about installation
of dog waste bins.
In response to Members’ questions the Enforcement Team Manager said the
following:
i.
The Rapid Response Team would respond to reports of
discarded needles within 2 hours. Many users simply discarded needles once used
although given safe discard pouches at needle exchanges.
ii.
Sharps bins were available in public toilets. They
had to be tamper proof and located in places that met certain criteria.
Locations were contentious as residents did not want bins located near them.
iii.
The council could not clear up litter on private
property eg alley near Long Road Sixth Form College.
Officers could ask permission to access the property for a one-off visit.
iv.
Ofo had been contacted to collect abandoned
bikes. They had been slow to respond but now undertook to collect within 24
hours of reporting. The council would impound bikes if they were not quickly
removed. It became a police matter if bikes obstructed the highway. The council
would remove bikes that were parked in a dangerous position or attached to
street furniture. Details could be reported to City Rangers.
v.
Ofo bikes were treated as business property
that could be left for the next user who would enter a code to use them. They
could not be treated like abandoned shopping trolleys. It took a lot of officer
resource to monitor and take enforcement action.
vi.
Traffic order penalty charges were issued against
the registered owner of a vehicle (not necessarily the person driving at the
time of an offence).
Following discussion, Members unanimously resolved to approve priorities for action
as listed above.