Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Issue
Matter for
Decision
The Officer’s report responded to issues raised by Councillor
Gillespie’s motion to Council on 19 April 2018, which was referred for
Executive Councillor decision. It proposed the council adopt a Sustainable
Food Policy Statement, and sets out the wide range of projects, policies and
initiatives in place across the council to support sustainable food and tackle
food poverty.
The report also acknowledged the innovative work that is taking place
across Cambridge to help the city become a leader in sustainable food practice.
It highlighted the emergence of Cambridge Sustainable Food from the community
and voluntary sector and the role it was now playing in gaining further
national recognition for sustainable food work that has been carried out
locally and in delivering local projects.
The council’s contribution was highlighted in the report, particularly
around food poverty and climate change. It recommended that we now formally
recognise Cambridge Sustainable Food as the lead body for sustainable food in
the city and help support its work, where possible, and look at our own food practice
to ensure that we, where practical, apply sustainable food principles.
Decision
of Executive Councillor for Environmental Services and City Centre
i.
Recognised the role of Cambridge Sustainable Food
in acting as an umbrella organisation in Cambridge that brings together a range
of organisations with an interest in promoting sustainable food within the
National Sustainable Food Cities Network.
ii.
Asked officers to work with Cambridge Sustainable
Food in submitting a bid to the national Sustainable Food Cities Network for
their Silver Award, contributing to the action plan where appropriate.
iii.
Adopted the Sustainable Food Policy Statement set
out in draft at Appendix A of the Officer’s report.
iv.
Undertook to report these decisions to Council at
its July meeting.
Reason for the Decision
As set out in the Officer’s report.
Any Alternative Options Considered and Rejected
Not applicable.
Scrutiny
Considerations
The Committee received a report from the Head of Corporate Strategy.
The Executive Councillor said the following in response to Members’
questions:
i.
The Council was looking at the possibility of
providing drink fountains in public parks. It was working with businesses to
provide free water refills where people had their own bottles in the meantime.
ii.
There were restrictions on public water fountain
use as water had to be tested to provide a regular safe service.
iii.
Undertook to ask Officers to review what food could
be sold in vending machines in council buildings to provide alternatives to
unhealthy foods. Vending machines food maybe specified by contract.
Councillor Gillespie made the following comments in response to the
report:
i.
Welcomed the report in response to his motion at
Council. The motion did include a proposal for a consultation, which Councillor
Gillespie hoped would occur in future.
ii.
Preferred wording as per paragraph 5.11 rather than
4.11, “where possible” allowed peopled to wriggle out
of their responsibilities.
iii.
Expressed regret the City Council could not support
fair trade activities.
iv.
The City Council should ensure event organisers did
not provide single use cups.
v.
The Sustainable Cities Network was reviewing gold
and silver awards on recycling.
The Head of Corporate Strategy responded:
· The Events Policy
had been reviewed recently. The Council could only take action where it had the
power to do so.
· He hoped the
Council received some recognition for its work on sustainable food, even if it
did not get Sustainable Cities Network gold standard.
The Committee unanimously resolved to endorse the recommendations.
The Executive Councillor approved the recommendations.
Conflicts of Interest Declared by the Executive Councillor (and any
Dispensations Granted)
No conflicts of interest were
declared by the Executive Councillor.