Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Issue
Matter for
Decision
In line with the
arrangements agreed by the Executive Councillor on 18th January 2018, for the Community
Facilities S106 funding round 2018, applications have been invited for
proposals to improve community facilities in Cambridge. Eleven applications
have been received and assessed against the S106 selection criteria. The
Officer’s report summarised those applications and assessments and makes nine
recommendations for S106 funding.
The Officer’s
report also took stock of other S106 issues which come within the Executive
Councillor’s portfolio and:
a)
reviewed community facilities and outdoor/indoor sports
S106 funding already allocated to particular existing projects;
b) considered further
opportunities for allocating community facilities and outdoor sports S106
funding to projects already identified as priorities in the Council’s Community
Centre Strategy and Playing Pitch Strategy.
Decision
of Executive Councillor for Communities
i.
Agreed the following S106
Community Facility grants and funding, detailed in Section 3 and Appendices 1
and 2 of the Officer’s report, subject to:
§ planning and
building control requirements satisfactorily met
§ business case
approval
§ signed community
grant agreement, securing appropriate community use of the facilities
§ any other
conditions highlighted in the report
Ref |
Grant |
Organisation |
Purpose |
||
R1 |
£31,000 |
Cambridge Museum of
Technology (Abbey) |
New kitchen, accessible toilets, equipment (chairs,
projector screen and speakers) |
||
R2 |
£50,000 |
Arbury Community Centre (King’s Hedges) |
Refurbishment and reconfiguration of large hall |
||
R3 |
£30,000 |
St Clement’s Church
(Market) |
Platform lift and protective railings around the lift area
to enable main entrance accessibility |
||
R4 |
£100,000 |
St John's Church (Queen Edith’s) |
Extension, new kitchen block, new toilet block and access, accessibility
alterations front and rear entrances |
||
R5 |
£24,000 |
Netherhall
School (Queen Edith’s) |
Improvements to
dining hall, involving the removal of the stage and replacing the flooring
increasing available area |
||
R6 |
£15,000 |
Nightingale Community Group (Queen Edith’s) |
Improvements to
existing meeting hut in the community garden at Nightingale Recreation
Ground, including seating, tables, serving hatch and external rain shelter
with bio-diverse roof |
||
R7 |
£21,000 |
Romsey Mill (Romsey) |
Improvements to community room, kitchen, multi-purpose
community hall, arts room and music studio |
||
R8 |
£15,000 |
Empty Common Community Garden Group (Trumpington) |
Wooden community meeting
hut within Empty Common community garden |
||
Ref |
Funding |
Organisation |
Purpose |
||
R9 |
All available
generic S106 funding from Petersfield – circa
£74,600 |
Cambridge City Council – funding allocation |
For a Community Facility on the Mill Road depot
site: contribution towards
construction with any surplus funds to contribute towards the fit out and
equipment for this building |
||
ii.
Increased the community facilities
S106 funding contribution for the new Nightingale Avenue Recreation Ground
Pavilion from £33,000 up to £150,000 towards the increased overall project
budget of £425,000. This reduces the outdoor sports S106 funding allocation
from £370,000 to no more than £275,000. (Detailed in Section 4 of the Officer’s
report).
iii.
Allocated up to £250,000 for
increased hockey pitch provision, to be available for community use, at the
Cambridge University Sports Ground, subject to community use agreement. (Detailed
in Section 5 of the Officer’s report).
iv.
Allocated up to £25,000 of indoor
sports S106 funding as a grant to Netherhall School
for the provision of inclusive fitness equipment for its new community gym and
fitness studio. (Detailed in Section 6 of the Officer’s report).
v.
Requested officers to review and
report back to this Committee any of these S106-funded projects which do not
progress to the implementation stage within 18 months.
Reason for the Decision
As set out in the Officer’s report.
Any Alternative Options Considered and Rejected
Not applicable.
Scrutiny
Considerations
The Committee received a report from the Community Funding and
Development Manager.
Councillor McGerty sought clarification
about the progress of
the meeting hut in the community garden at Nightingale Recreation
Ground project. He also queried if Ward Councillors were invited to community
group meetings with officers. The Community, Sport & Recreation Manager
said pavilion plans should be available in September/October. He undertook to
liaise with Ward Councillors post committee about community group meetings.
The Committee unanimously resolved to endorse the recommendations.
The Executive Councillor approved the recommendations.
Conflicts of Interest Declared by the Executive Councillor (and any
Dispensations Granted)
No conflicts of interest
were declared by the Executive Councillor.