Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Issue
Matter for Decision
The Officer’s report provided an update on the activities of
the Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Combined Authority since the 2 July
Strategy and Resources Scrutiny Committee.
Decision of the Executive Councillor for Strategy and
External Partnerships
i.
Noted the update provided on issues considered
at the meetings of the Combined Authority held on the 25 July and 26 September.
Reason for the Decision
As set out in the Officer’s report.
Any Alternative Options Considered and Rejected
Not applicable.
Scrutiny Considerations
The Committee received a report from the Chief Executive and
were asked to note the updated paperwork regarding the 26 September Combined
Authority meeting.
The Committee made the following comments in response to the
report:
i.
Commented that FOI requests had been submitted
to the Combined Authority to try and gain further knowledge of payments that
had been made to employees who had left the organisation.
ii.
Noted that the person specification for the new
Director of Strategy and Planning role did not require any planning experience.
iii.
Noted that the Chief of Staff role at the
Combined Authority was a politically restricted position, however the current
incumbent had been selected as a Conservative Parliamentary candidate.
iv.
Noted that the Affordable Housing Strategy which
had been adopted by the Combined Authority permitted equal bids by partner
councils for the money. This was not fair on South Cambridgeshire District
Council who would not receive the finance that they deserved.
v.
Expressed concerns regarding the governance of
the Combined Authority.
The Executive Councillor said the following in response to
Members’ questions:
i.
The senior staffing structure for the Combined
Authority was adopted in February 2018 so it had been in place for 9 months. It
was originally discussed at the Combined Authority that key Directors be in
place before the appointment of the Mayor. It was noted that quite a few posts
were currently filled by interims for example the Director of Finance.
ii.
He only became aware of the departure of the
Chief Executive of the Combined Authority when it was published in the
Cambridgeshire Times. Clearer transparency was required and an independent
finance and governance review had been requested in September by Councillor
Herbert and Councillor Smith.
iii.
It was unclear why a severance payment had been
made to the Chief Executive as there was no contractual obligation to pay one.
iv.
Noted that whilst good people had been appointed
to Senior Combined Authority posts there were a limited number of people
applying for top Combined Authority posts.
v.
Advice had been provided that there was no issue
with the Combined Authority’s Chief of Staff being a prospective Parliamentary
candidate unless an election was called.
vi.
Noted that South Cambridgeshire District Council
joined the Combined Authority to gain access to the affordable housing funding.
He had a meeting arranged with Housing Associations to discuss the affordable
housing strategy / funding. He felt that Housing Associations should be able to
far easier access and bid for the funding as well as constituent councils.
vii.
Referred to previous discussions in the
Committee meeting regarding Cambridge Northern Fringe East and the HIF funding
and the importance of the Combined Authority’s support with these projects. He
noted that there had been a lot of good work undertaken by the Combined
Authority and that we needed to work as a collaborative team.
The Committee and the Executive Councillor agreed to invite
Mayor Palmer to a Strategy and Resources Scrutiny Committee meeting and the
Chair of the Committee confirmed that she would write to Mayor Palmer to invite
him.
The Committee noted the update.
The Executive Councillor noted the update.
Conflicts of Interest Declared by the Executive Councillor (and any
Dispensations Granted)
No conflicts of interest
were declared by the Executive Councillor.