Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Issue
Matter for
Decision
A dedicated
Sharing Prosperity Fund (SPF) was created in 2014 to support pilot projects
which contribute to the objectives of the Anti-Poverty Strategy (APS). The
current SPF process has provided a mechanism to enable the Council to allocate
significant resources to anti-poverty initiatives over the past four years.
The Officer’s
report proposed changes to the process for allocating funding to anti-poverty
projects. The changes aimed to ensure that: projects continue to deliver value
for money; the process is transparent and accountable; and there is clarity for
officers and voluntary and community sector organisations regarding
opportunities to bid for funding.
The Council
currently awarded almost £2 million annually in grants to voluntary and
community sector organisations through 9 different grant funds, including the
SPF. It was proposed that over the next 12 months officers will conduct a wider
review of grants processes. This would explore the potential for a single
corporate grants ‘gateway’ for all grant funds and the potential for multi-year
funding agreements for some VCS organisations to help support the future
sustainability of the sector.
Decision
of Executive Councillor for Communities
i.
Approved the proposed changes to
the process for allocating funding to anti-poverty projects set out at 4.1 to
4.3 in this report.
ii.
Asked officers to conduct a wider
review of Council grants processes, with a particular focus on the proposals
set out at 5.3 in the Officer’s report, and report back to this Scrutiny
Committee with recommendations in due course.
Reason for the Decision
As set out in the Officer’s report.
Any Alternative Options Considered and Rejected
Not applicable.
Scrutiny
Considerations
The Committee received a report from the Strategy and Partnerships
Manager.
The Community Funding and Development Manager said the following in
response to Members’ questions:
i.
The Council currently awarded grants to voluntary
and community sector organisations from a number of different grant funds.
These were administered by different officers. The funds were listed on P175 of
the Officer’s report.
ii.
Undertook to send details of funds (and their work)
to councillors post meeting. This would include work to date and risk
assessment information.
The Executive Councillor signposted
financial implications set out in the Revenue and Capital Outturn, Carry
Forwards and Significant Variances report going to July Council, plus the Mid-Term
Financial strategy going to October Strategy and Resources Scrutiny Committee.
The Committee unanimously resolved to endorse the recommendations.
The Executive Councillor approved the recommendations.
Conflicts of Interest Declared by the Executive Councillor (and any
Dispensations Granted)
No conflicts of interest
were declared by the Executive Councillor.