Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Issue
Councillor Holt advised the Committee that
although the objector was known to her, she had no declarable interest in the
application. She had visited the site and had express and opinion. However, she
came to this Committee with an open mind
The Committee received an application for
full planning permission.
The
application sought approval for single storey and first floor side extensions
with alterations to existing and erection of garden shed.
The Committee noted the amendment sheet.
The Committee received a representation in objection to the application
from a local resident of Bradrushe Fields.
The representation covered the following issues:
i.
Speaking on behalf of neighbours.
ii.
Has sympathy with the needs of applicant’s family.
iii.
Out of scale with other properties in area.
iv.
Too big for plot.
v.
Overbearing.
vi.
Overshadowing and loss of evening light.
 vii.
Too close to neighbours.
viii.
Impact on nearby wildlife.
ix.
Disproportionate to scale of properties in the
area.
Jay Heal (Applicant) addressed the Committee in support of the
application.
The Committee:
Resolved (by 6 votes to 0 with 1 abstention) to grant the
application for planning permission in accordance with the officer
recommendation, for the reasons set out in the officer report, and subject to
the conditions recommended by the officers.