Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Issue
The Committee received a report from the Environmental Health
Manager.
The report advised under the powers conferred to Cambridge
City Council under the Town Police Clauses Act 1847 and the Local Government (Miscellaneous
Provisions) Act 1976, (as amended), Cambridge City Council has responsibility
for licensing Hackney Carriage, Private Hire and Dual Licence Drivers as well
as vehicle proprietors and Private Hire Operators within the City.
The current
Hackney Carriage & Private Hire Licensing Policy (the ‘policy’) applies to
all drivers, vehicles and operators and was last updated in October 2016.
At Full Licensing Committee on 24th July 2017 Members agreed
for a public consultation to be undertaken on the existing Hackney Carriage and
Private Hire Licensing Policy. One of the items for consideration was the
introduction of a Livery for Hackney Carriage Vehicles.
The consultation took place from 31 July 2017 until 3
September 2017.
The results of the consultation were presented to Full
Licensing Committee on 16th October 2017 where Members resolved (by 10 votes to 0) to the addition of a Livery requirement for
Hackney Carriages only.
A further consultation with the trade took place between 1st
and 26th March 2018 which focused on vehicle colour, livery style
and design along with an implementation plan, the results of which can be found
at Appendix B of the Officer’s report.
Officers reviewed and collated the feedback received and
invited members of the Trade (the Trade representatives) to discuss the results
further at a meeting on 1st May 2018.
At the meeting proposals for a livery colour, design and
style (along with an implementation plan) were discussed and agreed by those
present.
Members were now requested to review the Livery proposals and
determine what the Livery for Cambridge City Council Hackney Carriages should
be, along with the timescale for implementation.
The Committee received a representation from Mr Vines.
The representation covered the following issues:
i.
There had been 200 replies from
the taxi trade in response to the City Council’s consultation.
ii.
A silver base colour with stripe
was the preferred option for taxis in future.
iii.
It would be cheaper to administer
the colour change when drivers changed vehicles.
iv.
This would lead to a rank of
uniform cars.
v.
The stripe would be easy to remove
when vehicles were sold. If a different colour to silver was selected, this
could lead to a taxi coloured vehicle in the hands of a private individual. As
per the case in Newmarket.
Mr Vines said the following in response to Members’ questions about his
representation:
i.
Silver was suggested as a Cambridge taxi colour. Other
firms did not use it in their uniform, and silver was a base colour supplied by
all manufacturers. This would make it distinctive for Cambridge City.
ii.
Other based colours were used by other taxi firms,
so were not suitable for Cambridge vehicles.
iii.
Partially sighted people should not have any
difficulty identifying silver coloured taxis.
iv.
Taxi drivers did not want multi-colour vehicles (ie original colour covered with another colour coat) as
vehicles would not be returned to their original colour when sold.
The Committee received a representation from Mr St John-Ives.
The representation covered the following issues:
i.
Wanted to provide a safe and
professional service for the public.
ii.
Queried if officers had undertaken
an impact assessment of the policy implementation. IE its impact on taxi
drivers.
iii.
Suggested out of town operators
would not have to meet the same policy standards as city taxis.
iv.
The taxi livery requirement had to
be balanced against other future demands such as the implementation of electric
vehicles.
v.
It was more efficient on cost
grounds to change livery at the change of vehicle stage (not before).
The Committee received a representation from Mr Joyce.
The representation covered the following issues:
i.
The taxi trade had spoken to
councillors.
ii.
Taxi drivers were self-employed.
The cheapest time for them to add livery to vehicles would be when they changed
vehicles.
iii.
A black stripe and crest on the
side of city taxis would make them stand out from other operators in the area
who had different livery.
iv.
Drivers wanted to provide a safe
and professional vehicle service to customers.
The Committee made the following comments in response to the
representation:
i.
Partially sighted people may have difficulty seeing
silver coloured taxis, even if they had a black stripe.
ii.
The DVLA and Police should be notified if a
liveried vehicle was used by a private person.
The Committee then debated the Officer’s report.
The Committee made the following comments in response to the report:
i.
Concern that Private Hire vehicles would be obliged
to adopt the same colour scheme (if approved) in future, but current ones would
not.
ii.
It was more cost effective for the colour change to
be implemented when vehicles were changed instead of requiring vehicles to be
repainted. It could take 9 years for all Hackney Carriages and Private Hire
vehicles to be recoloured as they had a 9 year lifespan under council policy.
iii.
Can only control City Council licensed Hackney
Carriages and Private Hire vehicles, not out of town operators.
In response to Members’ questions the Environmental Health Manager said the following:
i.
120 of 322 Hackney Carriages in city were already a
silver colour. A black stripe could be added at the annual plate renewal date
each vehicle was subject to.
Mr Joyce said it would cost £90 to add a
stripe to vehicles. This was cheaper than requiring a full wrap.
ii.
The Council could require the stripe to be
implemented immediately (if approved), but this would impose a heavy
administrative burden on officers which could be avoided if vehicles were
certified as having a stripe as part of the Certificate of Conformity.
iii.
There had been a lot of discussion and consultation
between officers and the taxi trade.
a.
The trade initially did not support the livery
proposal, but did now.
b.
There were cost implications for the trade from
future proposals ie livery and electric vehicles.
c.
A base colour has been proposed as the most
appropriate one for taxis. Silver has been suggested for city licensed vehicles
as other colours are used by other operators.
iv.
Members had already considered the policy and
colour suggestions, which had been agreed in principle (ref executive summary
in Officer’s report, also Appendix B P81). Feedback from the taxi trade led to
the recommendation for silver base colour with black stripe, crest on side and
light on taxi roof to distinguish city licensed taxis from others.
Mr Joyce said the taxi trade has no
particular preference on stripe colour. He suggested the width could be circa 6
inches in width to be visible on a vehicle.
v.
It would be too expensive to add Cambridge logos to
the colour stripe.
vi.
There was no intention to specify a particular
shade of silver the vehicle should be. The V5 registration certificate just
needed to state the vehicle was silver colour, as different manufacturers may
produce different shades.
The Committee discussed the merits of different colours and styles for
stripes to be added to the silver base colour of taxis. Councillor McPherson
suggested the stripe could be black and yellow chequers.
The Committee
At the suggestion
of the Chair, recommendations were voted on individually.
Resolved (by 10
votes to 0) that saloon vehicles should have a 4
inch stripe and larger vehicles should have a 6 inch stripe.
Resolved (by 7
votes to 0) that the stripe should be black and yellow chequers.
Resolved (by 8
votes to 0) that vehicles should be silver (base colour) with a black and yellow
chequered stripe.
Councillors then paused the vote on
recommendations to discuss if they had voted to approve appropriate colours.
Mr St John-Ives said that a base colour and
stripe colour scheme could be obtained from a wide selection of suppliers. A
more complex colour scheme would require specialist applicators and so drive up
cost. This would impact on the feasibility for local drivers to obtain.
Resolved
(unanimously):
i.
To annul previous votes and reconsider the
Officer’s recommendations.
Approved Officer’s recommendations – with
amendments:
Considered and agreed the following proposals as a Livery
for Hackney Carriage Vehicles:
ii.
2.1.1 A silver base colour (as described on the V5
registration document for each vehicle) for all Hackney Carriage Vehicles.
iii.
2.1.4 That all Hackney Carriage Vehicles will
continue to have the Cambridge City Crests either side of the driver doors.
iv.
2.1.5 That external advertising on Hackney Carriage
Vehicles will only be permitted on the rear of the vehicle.
v.
2.1.6 That internal advertising in Hackney Carriage
Vehicles will continue to be permitted as described in the existing policy.
vi.
2.1.7 That all Private Hire Vehicles are excluded
from being silver.
Considered and agreed the following proposed
implementation plan:
vii.
2.2.1 For all existing
silver (as described on the V5 registration document for each vehicle) Hackney
Carriage Vehicles, the full livery requirements will need to be in place at the
next vehicle licence renewal. Where there is advertising externally on the
vehicle which will not comply with the new Livery specification, the
Proprietor/s must make contact with the Licensing Team in the first instance.
viii.
2.2.2 For all other Hackney Carriage Vehicles, upon
change of vehicle (which may not necessarily be at the next licence renewal),
the Proprietor/s will be required to fully comply with the Livery
specification.
ix.
2.2.3 For all existing silver (as described on the
V5 registration document for each vehicle) Private Hire Vehicles, upon change
of vehicle (which may not necessarily be at the next licence renewal), the
Proprietor/s will be required to obtain and licence a vehicle which is not
silver.
Deferred making a
decision on the following until 01/10/18 Licensing Committee:
x.
2.1.2 That a ‘wrap’ of two black gloss stripes, one
placed either side of the vehicle (running horizontally from the headlight to
the rear light).
xi.
2.1.3 That the wrap must be a thickness between
50mm (approximately 2 inches) and 75mm (approximately 3 inches).
xii.
2.2.4 That the changes in the policy will take
effect from 9th October 2018.
Councillors requested photos and samples of prospective colour schemes for consideration in future.