Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Issue
This Item was chaired Councillor Mike Todd-Jones
Matter for
Decision
The report provided an up-date on the sites in the Council’s
New Build Housing Programme – whether recently completed; under construction or
being assessed in terms of feasibility and viability for development. The
latter was known as the Rolling Programme.
Decision
of Executive Councillor for Housing
i.
Noted the up-dated position of schemes including
those on the current Rolling Programme (Appendix
1 and 2 of the Officer’s report).
ii.
Approved the new Rolling Programme (Appendix 3 of the Officer’s report).
Reason for the Decision
At the March 2017 Housing Committee, the Executive
Councillor for Housing approved a development framework within which new
housing by the Council would be delivered. The framework included a commitment
to bring a report to the Housing Committee every year to demonstrate progress
of schemes on the Rolling Programme.
Any Alternative Options Considered and Rejected
Not applicable.
Scrutiny
Considerations
The Committee received a report from the Managing Director, Housing
Development Agency, regarding the New Build Housing Programme.
The Committee sought reassurance that full consultation and engagement
would be completed with relevant residents and communities. The Managing
Director, Housing Development Agency, reminded the Committee that they had
received a report on the engagement strategy in March 2016.
The Managing Director, Housing Development Agency said the following in
response to Members’ questions:
i.
The costs associated with re-housing or decanting
residents had been taken into account.
ii.
The timeframes for some development on the programme
had been extended due to the rent cut decision of 2015. At that point the
development programme had been placed on pause.
iii.
New build properties would generally have a three year
delivery timescale and therefore restarting the programme would take time
before new housing was delivered.
iv.
The programme would be a mix of small scale,
in-fill projects and larger developments. A balanced approach would be needed
to deliver the targets.
The Committee unanimously resolved to endorse the recommendations.
The Executive Councillor approved the recommendation.