Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Issue
Matter for Decision
The Committee received a
report from the Asset Manager (Estates and Facilities) which sought approval
for three refurbishment projects related to the Council’s Office Accommodation
Strategy.
An out of cycle decision
made by the Executive Councillor on 10th
November 2016 gave approval for the allocation of £2,443,000 capital funds for
refurbishment works but did not give specific approval for award of
contracts to carry out works.
Decision of Executive Councillor
for Finance and Resources
i.
Approved
the proposed refurbishment works to create new office accommodation at 130
Cowley Road, Cowley Road Compound and Mandela House subject to the tendered prices
for work being acceptable.
ii.
Authorised the Strategic Director
to award contracts for the appointment of contractors to carry out
refurbishment works at 130 Cowley Road, Cowley Road Compound and Mandela House in accordance with
the requirements of the Constitution.
Reason for the Decision
As set out in the Officer’s report.
Any Alternative Options Considered and Rejected
Not applicable.
Scrutiny Considerations
The Committee received a report from the Asset
Manager.
The Committee made the following comments in response to the report:
Councillor
Cantrill commented that given the amount of money (£2.5 million) being spent on
the renovation he would have liked to have seen more detail about the plans.
The original decision was made out of cycle which meant to date it had not been
scrutinised at all. He asked why £500k was being spent on temporary
accommodation at Cowley Road, and was an adequate
return expected?
Councillor Bick
asked why the Council had been less than forthcoming in producing figures and
plans.
Councillor Sinnott referred to Mill Road Depot and asked when Cowley Road was estimated to be completed so that
development of the Depot site could begin?
The Asset Manager (Estates and Facilities) said the following in response to
Members’ questions:
i.
Cowley Road had been
selected because it could accommodate the varying requirements of council
services. A 15 year lease on the building had been agreed and there were plans
to use it for at least five years with future potential to rent it out thereafter,
recovering the investment cost.
ii.
The Interim Strategic
Director referred to figures and plans of the development, he assured that
significant work had gone into both the design and the tendering process. The costs
had been looked into thoroughly and there was a clear intention to proceed with
the best value for money.
iii.
Vacation of the Mill Road
depot depended on the completion of refurbishment at Mandela House.
The Executive Councillor
for Finance and Resources
said the following in response to Members’
questions:
i.
The original brief for the
council’s office accommodation strategy came to Strategy and Resources in
January 2016, however the costs for aspects of the
project had not been available in full then. Councillor
Cantrill had been consulted at the time of the November 2016 Executive
decision.
ii.
Referring to the out of
cycle decision, he stated that the timing was just unfortunate. The detailed
finances were not available in time for the scrutiny committee in October and
waiting until the January meeting would have delayed the overall project
significantly.
The Committee resolved by 4 votes to 0 to endorse the
recommendations.
The Executive Councillor
approved the recommendations.
Conflicts of Interest Declared by the Executive Councillor (and any Dispensations Granted)
No conflicts of interest
were declared by the Executive Councillor.