Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Issue
Matter for Decision
To
consider and comment before decision by the Executive Councillor for Planning
Policy and Transport.
Decision of Executive Councillor for
Planning Policy and Transport
·
To agree the comments set out in the consultation response attached to
the officer report and that these are submitted to the Government as Cambridge
City and South Cambridgeshire District Councils’ formal response to the
consultation.
·
To agree that any subsequent changes to the consultation response as a
result of the South Cambridgeshire District Planning Portfolio Holder meeting
be agreed with the Executive Councillor for Planning Policy and Transport,
Chair and Spokes prior to submission.
Reasons for the Decision
As
set out in the Officer’s report.
Any Alternative Options Considered and
Rejected
Not applicable.
Scrutiny Considerations
The Committee
received a report from the Planning Policy and Economic Development
Officer.
The Committee made the
following comments in response to the report:
i. Commented that the
demand for new housing was only met when local authorities were constructing
houses. Without the ability for local
authorities to borrow and utilise receipts then it would be difficult to
achieve the uplift in housing construction required in Cambridge to meet
demand.
ii. Drew attention to
the implication that within the White Paper that Planning Authorities were
responsible for the current status of the housing market when government policies
such as Right to Buy and developers purchasing land but delaying development, a
practice known as ‘land-banking’ had a far greater impact upon the housing
market.
iii.
Clarified paragraph 3.3, bullet points 1 and 4 of
the officer report, questioning whether the agreement of all local authorities
was required in respect of the allocation of strategic sites and the level of
residential allocations in local plans.
iv.
Questioned the amount of time and resources had
been used in compiling the consultation response.
The Planning Policy
and Economic Development Officer said the following in response to Members
questions:
i.
Confirmed that the Department for Communities and
Local Government (DCLG) confirmed, following the publication of the report that
bullet point 4 of the report referred to residential allocations and that DCLG
had not clarified bullet point 1.
ii.
Explained that in compiling the consultation
response, 15 officers across 2 Councils had input which took considerable time
in reading the consultation and formulating responses.
The Committee
resolved 4 in favour, 0 against, with 2 abstentions to endorse the
recommendations.
The Executive
Councillor approved the recommendations.
Conflicts of Interest Declared by the
Executive Councillor (and any Dispensations Granted)
No conflicts of
interest were declared by the Executive Councillor.