Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Issue
This Item was chaired by Diana Minns (Vice Chair / Tenant Representative)
Matter for
Decision
The report proposed a joint procurement exercise with South
Cambridgeshire District Council, to provide a Housing Management Information System
for both authorities. The Housing Services would remain distinct, with two
instances of the new system provided, but recognised that moving to the use of
a single provider would make it easier for the two Councils to share some or
all of their housing services in the future.
Decision
of Executive Councillor for Housing
i.
Approved a capital budget of £500,000 for
Cambridge City Council’s share of the up-front costs of jointly procuring a new
Housing Management Information System with South Cambridgeshire District
Council. The cost is to be fully met from existing repairs and renewals funds.
ii.
Noted the current annual support and
maintenance revenue budget of £75,000.
iii.
Recognised the procurement benefits of
undertaking this project now, in partnership with South Cambridgeshire District
Council.
iv.
Approved that the authority proceeds with
this joint procurement exercise, and that following a compliant competitive
process, the Strategic Director is given delegated authority to tender and
award a contract on behalf of Cambridge City Council.
Reason for the Decision
To procure a modern, fit for
purpose housing and property management system for the HRA, the wholly owned
housing company and any other assets held by the Council which require
management activity to be undertaken as set out in the Officer’s report.
Any Alternative Options Considered and Rejected
Not applicable.
Scrutiny
Considerations
The Committee
received a report from the Business Manager/Principal Accountant.
The Committee made the following comments in response to the report:
i.
Welcomed the information regarding home ownership.
ii.
Suggested that tenant and leaseholder
representative could be used as part of the consultation process.
The Business Manager/Principal
Accountant stated the following in response to Members’ questions:
i.
The joint project board would develop a
communications strategy.
ii.
The full tender would include a requirement for
other providers to share the service in future.
iii.
No additional maintenance budget would be agreed
until the system was in place. Cost would vary depending on what host system
was selected.
iv.
Cost would be shared across the authorities
proportionally, based on the number of properties under management and the
number of users of the system.
v.
The system would be flexible enough to cope with
any impact of devolution.
The Committee resolved unanimously to endorse the recommendation.
The Executive Councillor
approved the recommendation.
Conflicts of Interest Declared by the Executive Councillor (and any
Dispensations Granted)
No conflicts of interest
were declared by the Executive Councillor.