Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Issue
Matter for
Decision
In 2014, a review
was commissioned to gain a fuller understanding of the issues affecting ease of
access in and around the city centre for a range of users, but particularly
pedestrians, disabled and wheelchair users. The review report was considered at
the March 2015 Community Services Scrutiny Committee; and in July 2015, a plan of
action was developed and approved at committee to take the next steps to bring
about the identified changes needed. A progress update of the actions
undertaken from the action plan was presented in July 2016. In March 2016, a
survey of advertising signage use in the city centre was undertaken and the
views of local business users sought on the voluntary removal of advertising
signs, such as A-boards.
The Officer’s
report reviewed the survey findings and set out a proposed policy for
advertising signage and the associated process and timetable for its
consultation, review and implementation.
Decision
of Executive Councillor for Streets and Opens Spaces
i.
Authorised officers to consult on the proposed
advertising ‘A’ board and sign policy, as set out in Appendix A.
ii.
Authorised the expansion of the advertising ‘A’
board and sign policy to include the whole of Cambridge (rather than just the
city centre), as defined by the City Council’s administrative boundary
Reason for the Decision
As set out in the Officer’s report.
Any Alternative Options Considered and Rejected
Not applicable.
Scrutiny
Considerations
The Committee received a report from the Operations Manager – Community
Engagement and Enforcement.
The Committee made the following comments in response to the report:
i.
Condition, width and gradient of pavements affected
accessibility. ‘A’ boards should not be placed on ‘good’ areas as these were
generally used by people with sensory/mobility impairments.
ii.
Wind could knock over boards and cause
obstructions.
The Operations Manager – Community Engagement and Enforcement said the
following in response to Members’ questions:
i.
Enforcement action would be taken against
obstructions on public land/highway, but not private land.
ii.
The policy allowed for flexible interpretation on a
case by case basis eg location of ‘A’ boards on a verge instead of a pavement
if it was a better location.
iii.
Feedback from the consultation in February – April
would help to clarify the text in the final policy. The consultation would take
into account that different issues arise at different times of the year.
The Committee unanimously resolved to endorse the recommendations.
The Executive Councillor approved the recommendations.
Conflicts of Interest Declared by the Executive Councillor (and any
Dispensations Granted)
No conflicts of interest
were declared by the Executive Councillor.