Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Issue
This Item was chaired by Councillor Todd-Jones
Matter for Decision
The report sought approval for an Interim Housing Strategy
Statement for Cambridge, prior to development of a proposed joint Housing
Strategy for Cambridge City and South Cambridgeshire District Councils. In
particular it sought approval for a vision for housing in the City, and a set
of strategic aims to help achieve the proposed vision.
Decision
of Executive Councillor for Housing
i.
Approved the aspirational vision laid out in the
draft Interim Housing Strategy Statement 2017 (attached as Appendix A to the
Officer’s report), for Cambridge to be a City where:
a)
The
housing market functions effectively, providing homes which are as affordable
as possible; to meet the needs of residents and support the local economy;
b)
There
is a wide and varied choice of good quality, sustainable homes of different
sizes, types and tenures, to meet the needs of a wide range of different
households;
c)
Homes
are located in high quality sustainable environments, served by jobs and
neighbourhood facilities, appropriate green space, effective transport links
and other necessary infrastructure;
d)
Everyone
has access to a suitable home, and residents are able to live as healthily,
safely, independently as possible;
e)
People from
all walks of life live in harmony, within mixed and balanced communities; and
homes and communities continue to meet the needs of residents into the future;
f)
We have
strong relationships with residents, developers and partners that enable us to
deliver housing and services effectively, and to innovate where appropriate.
ii.
Approved the strategic aims laid out in the draft
Interim Housing Strategy Statement 2017 (attached as Appendix A to the
Officer’s report) as follows:
a)
Work
with stakeholders to accelerate the delivery of housing and infrastructure in
and around Cambridge as set out in the Greater Cambridge City Deal and
Cambridgeshire & Peterborough Devolution Deal;
b)
Provide,
and promote provision of, good quality, energy and water efficient homes, in
high quality, sustainable environments, alongside appropriate infrastructure;
c)
Ensure
that new homes: are as affordable as possible; are available in a range of
sizes, types and tenures, to meet a range of needs; and can support mixed,
balanced and sustainable communities;
d)
Make
the best use of council land to maximise the supply of housing for those who
cannot afford to access the private market;
e)
Make
and promote the best use of existing homes;
f)
Enable
people to live settled lives, within safe and healthy homes and communities;
g)
Manage
and maintain the council’s homes and estates in a cost-effective way,
protecting core services, balancing the budget, and operating within our means;
h)
Promote
a well-regulated, fair, good quality private rented sector, and support the
provision of longer and more settled tenancies;
i)
Recognise
links between health, social care & housing, and work positively with
partner organisations to promote and improve quality of life and health and
well-being for those most in need;
j)
Prevent
homelessness and rough sleeping;
k)
Minimise
use of temporary accommodation and maximise access to longer term housing
solutions;
l)
Enable
people to make informed choices about their housing;
m)
Promote
sustained and settled lifestyles and minimise social exclusion.
iii.
Noted the ongoing and emerging actions being
pursued with partners to achieve the vision and strategic aims proposed in the
Interim Housing Strategy Statement, attached as Appendix A to the Officer’s
report.
Reason for the Decision
As set out in the Officer’s report.
Any Alternative Options Considered and Rejected
Not applicable.
Scrutiny
Considerations
The Committee received a report from the Housing Strategy Manager.
The Committee made the following comments in response to the report:
i.
Suggested that the report was aspirational but
lacked tangible targets.
ii.
Welcomed the vision
within the documents.
The Strategic Director and the Housing Strategy Manager stated the
following in response to Members’ questions:
i.
The report was intentionally an aspirational
framework pulling together various work strands. Subsequent reports would
provide the measurable detail.
ii.
Any significant changes would be brought back to
this committee for discussion.
iii.
The Strategy was an interim measure prior to more detail emerging around
government policy, and Cambridge City & South Cambridgeshire District
Councils developing a joint Housing Strategy. Confirmed that other social
housing providers also offered intermediate and other, below market price,
housing products.
iv.
Both the needs of older people, and those of
younger people with disabilities, were included in the recommendations.
v.
Expressed support for the continued delivery of
support for the vulnerable to allowed them to live as independently as
possible.
Diane Best
requested a correction as following, struck through replaced with bold:
In terms of issues relating to council
housing, tenant and leasehold representatives scrutinise both services and key
decisions: as service inspectors; through a Housing Regulation Panel; and as
members of the council’s Housing Management Board through a Housing Regulation Panel; and as
representatives on the council’s Housing Scrutiny Committee.
This was agreed nem com.
Councillor Holland sought clarification on
the provision of housing for older people. She asked if recommendations from a
recent Local Government Association paper on housing had been addressed by this
report.
Alan Carter responded and stated that the
City Council was delivering housing for the over 50s within general needs
housing stock with the aim of offering an attractive alternative that would
tempt downsizing from family housing. This approach was recommended by the Housing our Ageing Population: Panel for
Innovation (HAPPI) report.
The Committee unanimously resolved to endorse the recommendations.
The Executive Councillor
approved the recommendation.
Conflicts of Interest Declared by the Executive Councillor (and any
Dispensations Granted)
No conflicts of interest
were declared by the Executive Councillor.