Issue - decisions

Matter for Decision

To note that the Local Government Ombudsman had upheld a complaint relating to the provision of temporary accommodation. The LGO found that the Council was not at fault in refusing to grant Mr Y a second sole residential license permitting him to use its riverside moorings after he separated from his partner. It was at fault through delay in considering his representations about the matter. But, he was able to continue living on the river during this period. So, he did not suffer significant injustice.

Decision of Executive Councillor for Environment and Waste

      i.          Endorsed the actions taken by officers in response to the finding of the Local Government Ombudsman.

Reason for the Decision

As set out in the Officer’s report.

Any Alternative Options Considered and Rejected

Not applicable.

Scrutiny Considerations

The Committee received a report from the Asset Manager, Streets and Open Spaces.

The Asset Manager, Streets and Open Spaces stated the following in response to Members’ questions:

       i.          The incident investigated was infrequent. However, the relevant policy needed additional information for clarity.

     ii.          A review of the moorings policy would be brought to committee later in the year.

The Committee unanimously resolved to endorse the recommendations.

The Executive Councillor approved the recommendation.

Conflicts of Interest Declared by the Executive Councillor (and any Dispensations Granted)

No conflicts of interest were declared by the Executive Councillor.