Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Issue
Matter for
decision
The report addressed the specific requests for further work into the
Park Street Car Park development made by the Leader in respect of tenure mix,
preferred development option, opportunities to provide housing that is
affordable and whether to build the Affordable Housing itself or to sell it to
a Registered Provider.
Decision of the
Leader
i.
Noted the impact of different
tenure mixes on financial return for the Council and that a final scheme for
the redevelopment of the Park Street Car Park will be brought back to the
Strategy and Resources Committee recommending a tenure mix, budget and
development option.
ii.
Noted that the final scheme will
have received prior scrutiny from the Council’s Capital Programme Board and
will be the subject of a Planning and Development Brief agreed with the
Council’s planning section.
iii.
Following this interim update,
further recommendations and analysis will be brought forward in further
reports, integrating proposals for
- The
development and funding model for Park Street, including projected costs,
capital and revenue projections and budget.
- The
redevelopment content and the design for the new car park, housing, secure
cycle parking and other elements
- Detailed
proposals for affordable housing and wider housing delivery, in line with
decisions made to date.
- The
parking and transport mitigation strategy during the development period.
- The
delivery timetable and communication plan for the project including updates for
the public dialogue with traders and organisations in the Bridge Street area
before and during the project.
Reason for the
Decision
As set out in the Officer’s report.
Any Alternative
Options Considered and Rejected
Not applicable.
Scrutiny
Considerations
The Committee received a report from the Head of Strategic Housing and
Head of Specialist Services.
The Chair proposed an additional recommendation (c) (additional text
underlined)
Following this interim update, further recommendations and analysis will
be brought forward in further reports, integrating proposals for
1. The
development and funding model for Park Street, including projected costs,
capital and revenue projections and budget.
2. The
redevelopment content and the design for the new car park, housing, secure
cycle parking and other elements
3. Detailed
proposals for affordable housing and wider housing delivery, in line with
decisions made to date.
4. The
parking and transport mitigation strategy during the development period.
5. The
delivery timetable and communication plan for the project including updates for
the public dialogue with traders and organisations in the Bridge Street area
before and during the project
On a show of hands the additional recommendation was unanimously agreed
The Committee unanimously resolved to endorse the recommendations.
The Leader approved the recommendations.
Conflicts of
Interest Declared by the Leader (and any Dispensations Granted):
Not applicable.