Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Issue
Matter for
Decision
The Council has
recognised the need to change the way services are provided in the future in
order to create opportunities for innovation and provide service efficiencies.
As a result the Council has agreed to work in partnership with South
Cambridgeshire District Council and Huntingdonshire District Council to deliver
a number of shared services.
The Council also
seeks to support economic growth within the area and as a consequence needs to
provide effective and efficient services. The building control service is
responsible for ensuring delivery of safe, healthy, accessible and sustainable
buildings; and operates within a commercial and competitive arena.
A shared building
control service has the potential to be a more sustainable and resilient
business model for future service delivery and cost effectiveness. The ability
to generate additional income from new services and efficiencies will also
support enhanced competitiveness.
The Officer’s report set out the strategic benefits and outline business
case for a single shared building control service for Cambridge City Council,
South Cambridgeshire District Council and Huntingdonshire District Council.
Decision
of Executive Councillor for Planning Policy and Transport
Agreed:
i.
The outline business case for
entering into a shared Building Control service with South Cambridgeshire and
Huntingdonshire District Councils.
ii.
That a fully developed business
case is provided to the Environment Scrutiny Committee on 7 July 2015.
iii.
That recruitment of an Interim
Shared Building Control Manager be authorised to help develop the full business
case and the design of the new service.
Reason for the Decision
As set out in the Officer’s report.
Any Alternative Options Considered and Rejected
Not applicable.
Scrutiny
Considerations
The Committee received a report from the Building Control Manager.
The Committee made the following comments in response to the report:
i.
The Council Building Control Shared Service was an
important service.
ii.
The business case to share services with other councils
had some merits, but the quality of the service should not be compromised.
iii.
The service needed to be located near to customers
in order to be effective. Resilience and specialist services were also
important considerations.
iv.
Charging for the Building Control Shared Service
could be a source of income for the Council.
In response to Members’ questions the Building Control Manager said the
following:
i.
The location of the Building Control Shared Service
would be reviewed in future. The intention was to place it so that Officers
could visit city and outskirt locations.
ii.
An options appraisal would be set out in the full
business case coming to 7 July 2015 Environment Committee.
iii.
Regulations and guidelines set fees that could be
charged for the Building Control Shared Service on a not for profit basis for
chargeable activities.
The Committee unanimously resolved to endorse the recommendations.
The Executive Councillor approved the recommendations.
Conflicts of Interest Declared by the Executive Councillor
(and any Dispensations Granted)
No conflicts of interest
were declared by the Executive Councillor.