Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Issue
Matter for
Decision
The report
provided a review of the programme and specifically sought approval of three
year rolling programme that includes sites to be investigated 2014/15 to
2016/17.The report set this request for approval to the revised three year
programme in the context of the delivery of Affordable Housing through the
planning system, and the new Council housing programme.
Decision of Executive Councillor for Housing
The Executive Councillor for Housing resolved
to:
i.
Approve revisions to the
3 Year Rolling Programme 2014/15 to 2016/17 in the context of the wider
Affordable Housing Programme with the exception of sites that require
resident consultation for 2015/16 & 2016/17 which would be brought forward
with a revised process for engaging with residents.
Reason for the Decision
As set out in the Officer’s report.
Any Alternative Options Considered and Rejected
Not applicable.
Scrutiny
Considerations
The Committee
received a report from the Head of Strategic Housing.
The Committee made the following comments in response to the report.
i.
Queried if the process for resident consultation
was sufficient.
ii.
Questioned if the resident consultation should be
developed further for particular residents.
iii.
Asked what was the time frame for resident
consultation.
The Committee:
In response to
Members’ questions the Executive Councillor for Housing and Officers confirmed
the following:
i.
There was no reason why the resident consultation
could not be changed to meet the needs of the residents.
ii.
There was no time limit concerning resident
consultation.
Councillor Baigent proposed the following
amendment to the Officer recommendation (additional text underlined).
ii.
Approve revisions to the
3 Year Rolling Programme 2014/15 to 2016/17 in the context of the wider
Affordable Housing Programme with the exception of sites that require
resident consultation for 2015/16 & 2016/17 which would be brought forward
with a revised process for engaging with residents.
The Committee resolved
unanimously to endorse the amendment to the recommendation.
The Executive Councillor approved to endorse the amendment to the
recommendation.
Conflicts of Interest
Declared by the Executive Councillor (and any
Dispensations Granted)
No conflicts of interest
were declared by the Executive Councillor