Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Issue
Matter
for Decision: The Single Equality
Scheme Annual Report reports on progress against actions for the second year of
the scheme (2013/14); highlights some additional achievements during the year;
and proposes a number of actions for the third year of the scheme (2014/15)
Decision of the Leader:
The Leader resolved to:
i.
Note the
progress and achievements during the second year of the City Council’s Single
Equality Scheme.
ii.
Approve
the actions for the third year of the City Council’s Single Equality Scheme (as
set out in Appendix A of the officer’s report).
iii.
Approve
the proposed amendment of the Terms of Reference for the Equalities Panel to
reflect the role of the panel in reviewing and quality assuring Equality
Impacts Assessments.
Reasons for the
Decision: As set out in the officer’s report
Any alternative
options considered and rejected: As set out in the officer’s report
Scrutiny
Considerations:
The committee received a report from the Strategy and
Partnerships Manager.
In response to member’s questions the Chief Executive said
the following:
i.
As part of the process of looking at shared
services Equality Impact Assessments (EqIA) would be
undertaken to identify any potential issues. Checks and balances would also be
in place to ensure the Council’s overall policy objectives were maintained in
any shared service arrangements.
In response to member’s questions the Strategy and
Partnerships Manager said the following:
i.
Whilst the report was specifically responding to
the protected characteristics as set out in the Equalities Act, there was a recognition of the impact of socioeconomic factors. It was
suggested that this could be set out more clearly in future reports.
ii.
A wider range of information would be discussed
at Equality Panel meetings.
In response to member’s questions the Chief Executive and
the Director of Customer and Community Services said the following:
i.
Whilst the report was specifically responding to
the protected characteristics as set out in the Equalities Act, there was a recognition of the issues around discrimination against
the travelling community.
ii.
Cambridge
City Council’s Children and Young People’s Participation Service (ChYpPS) had undertaken work with the travelling community
and this had featured heavily in last year’s report.
iii.
The
travelling community had been involved in previous Black History Month and the
Holocaust Memorial Day events.
iv.
Detailed
work had been undertaken by the Head of Strategic Housing on identifying
traveler’s pitches. This information could be provided to the committee outside
of the meeting.
v.
Agreed
to review the work currently undertaken with the travelling community.
vi.
As
the Corn Exchange would not become a Trust until March 2015 Councillors
would be involved with the Trust Working Group to ensure the equalities ethos
of the Council was maintained.
In response to comments made by the committee the Leader of
the Council said the following:
i.
Equalities work had been mainstreamed across all
departments to ensure that it was engrained into everything the Council did.
ii.
Culturally the City had achieved a lot with
regards to equalities.
iii.
When investigating shared services it was
important to ensure that the City Council’s good work on equalities influenced
others ways of working.
iv.
Supported
a review of the work currently being undertaken with the travelling community.
v.
Protected
characteristics are sometimes the factors driving socioeconomic
disadvantage.
The Scrutiny Committee considered the recommendations and
endorsed them unanimously.
The Leader approved the recommendation.
Conflicts of Interest Declared by the Leader (and any Dispensations
Granted):
Not applicable.