Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Issue
Matter
for Decision:
i.
The
Council’s current sport strategy ended in 2013 and a steer was given for
the new strategy to have outcomes focussed on evidence-based need assessment,
widening access, promoting participation in sport and improving health and
well-being. There was also a need to identify
local facility investment and improvement priorities and opportunities, in
particular in relation to the use of developer contributions for outdoor and
indoor sports facilities.
ii.
Workshop sessions
were undertaken and well attended by many local sporting organisations,
National Governing Body representatives, and delivery partners, where initial
feedback was received on the emerging priority areas. Following the workshops
an online survey about these new priorities was circulated to many
organisations. The Council received a large number of responses, which have
helped shape this evidence-based focus for the new Sport and Physical Activity
Plan for 2014 – 2017.
Decision of Executive Councillor for Community
Wellbeing:
The Executive
Councillor resolved:
i.
To consider the conclusions from the recent
public consultation and approve the proposed priorities and approach
(paragraphs 4.8–10 of the Officer’s report).
ii.
To
focus the use of developer contributions for outdoor and indoor sports on
capital projects to improve existing sports facilities in order to encourage
greater participation in sports and physical activity (see paragraphs 5.5-6 of
the Officer’s report).
Reason for the Decision:
As set out in the Officer’s report.
Any Alternative Options Considered and Rejected:
Not applicable.
Scrutiny Considerations:
The Committee received a report from the Sports and
Recreation Manager regarding the Sports and Physical Activities Plan 2014-2017.
The in response to questions from the Committee, officers
confirmed the following:
i.
‘Value
for Money’ was important and was monitored.
ii.
Exercise
referrals were monitored by health professionals.
iii.
GLL had
employed an exercise referral expert.
iv.
The
service specifications had been closely examined.
v.
The Plan
targets were in line with Council priorities.
vi.
Synergies
with other services, such as ChYpPs, allowed this
discretionary service to achieve good results.
vii.
Clear
targets would be developed with partner agencies in future.
The Committee welcomed the proposals and agreed the sports
opportunities needed to be available for all levels of ability and for all
ages. However, it was recognised that it was hard to set target of the measure
progress of social goals.
The Sports and Recreation Manager undertook to circulate the
Equality Impact Assessment information.
The Committee resolved by 4 votes to 0 to endorse the
recommendations.
The Executive Councillor approved the recommendation.
Conflicts of interest declared by the Executive Councillor (and any
dispensations granted)
Not applicable.