Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Issue
Matter
for Decision:
The report outlined a proposal to establish an alternative
delivery mechanism for elements of the Arts & Recreation Service, namely
the Cambridge Corn Exchange, Cambridge Folk Festival, and outdoor events. The
report was based on a study completed by consultants Bates Wells Braithwaite,
(BWB) in association with Festivals & Events International (FEI). Officers
recommend a Trust is established on the basis of the business case and an
analysis of the risks and benefits in relation to the options available to the
Council. The report highlights the issues that will need to be addressed and a
process for taking these forward.
Decision of Executive Councillor for Community
Wellbeing:
The Executive Councillor resolved:
i.
To approve in principle the establishment of a
Trust to run Cambridge Corn Exchange, Cambridge Folk Festival and other events,
and to authorise work to progress this, subject to further decisions required
as part of iii. below (recommendation 2.3 of the
Officer’s report).
ii.
To approve that a Working Group should be set up as
outlined in section 3.10 of the Officer’s report, to support the work involved
in the implementation stage.
iii.
To agree that the following further work (see
section 3.10 of the officer’s report) which has wider implications for the
Council, is progressed in discussion with the relevant Directors and the
Working Group prior to discussion at Strategy & Resources Scrutiny Committee
and final authorisation by the Executive Councillor for Customer Services and
Resources:
§ Management of transfer of staff
§ Funding Agreement
§ Agreement of
property, land use and other rights
§ Expectations and
relationships between the Council and the Trust
iv.
To delegate authority for all other decisions
necessary to implement and establish the Trust (including the appointment of a
Chair) to the Director of Customer and Community Services in discussion with
the Working Group.
v.
To acknowledge the indicative timetable for
implementation, and agree that this may be varied in accordance with the
delegation in iv. above.
vi.
To bring forward proposals to the autumn 2014
committee cycle for a refreshed programme of outdoor events.
Reason for the Decision:
As set out in the Officer’s report.
Any Alternative Options Considered and Rejected:
Not applicable.
Scrutiny Considerations:
The Committee received a report from the Head of Arts and
Recreation regarding the future management arrangements for the Cambridge Folk
Festival and Cambridge Corn Exchange.
The Director of Customer and Community Services outlined
further the rationale behind the proposal. She stated that the current delivery
method was not sustainable in the long term. She stated that public consultation,
over a number of years, had indicated public support for the events but had
consistently highlighted unhappiness about any financial subsidy to support the
events.
The Strategy and Partnerships Manager would be asked to
circulate details of public
consultation using the Citizen Survey.
In response to questions from the Committee, the Head of
Arts and Recreation confirmed the following:
i.
A
decision to move to an arms-length trust should be regarded as permanent as it
would be very difficult undo once agreed.
ii.
The
relationship of the Trust Board and the Council would be key.
iii.
A strong
board with a range of skills would be needed.
iv.
The
model had been adopted successfully elsewhere.
v.
The
decision was based on securing the future of the events rather than looking for
savings.
vi.
Trade
Unions had been involved in the early discussions and risks to staff had been
considered.
vii.
A
working group would set the ethos for staff and good relationships had already
been established.
viii.
The
financial separation of the trust could include a 5 year capped subsidy which
could be reduced if not needed. Some degree of flexibility would be needed.
ix.
Whilst it was anticipated the remaining outdoor
events programme would run ‘as is’ in 2015 via the Trust, a review would take place
in 2014 to determine future arrangements
The Committee
resolved by 4 votes to 0 to endorse the recommendations.
The Executive Councillor approved the recommendations.
Conflicts of interest declared by the Executive Councillor (and any
dispensations granted)
Not applicable.