Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Issue
Matter
for Decision: The report
detailed the budget proposals which relate to this portfolio that are included
in the Budget-Setting Report (BSR) 2014/15. The report also included recommendations
concerning the review of charges, project appraisals and capital re-phasing for
schemes in the Capital and Revenues Project Plan for this portfolio.
Decision of the Executive Councillor for Customer Services and Resources
The Executive Councillor resolved to:
Review of Charges:
a)
Approve the proposed charges for this portfolio’s
services and facilities, as shown in Appendix A of the Officer’s report.
Capital:
b)
Approve, where relevant, project appraisals (shown in
Appendix D of the Officer’s report).
c)
Seek approval from the Executive to carry forward
resources from 2013/14, as detailed in Appendix C of the Officer’s report, to
fund re-phased capital spending.
Reasons for the
Decision: As set out in the Officer’s report
Any alternative
options considered and rejected: As set out in the Officer’s report
Scrutiny
Considerations:
The committee received a report from the Director of
Resources.
In response to member’s questions the Director of Resources
said the following:
i.
Following a review of the liabilities against
the Insurance Fund, an additional contribution of £120,000 was required. It was
agreed that more detail would be provided to Councillor Herbert outside of the
meeting.
ii.
A review of the Corporate Document Management
System Project has identified £148,000 of the original capital budget as a
saving. As the original funding took into account implementation and roll out
of the project across the Council it was therefore very difficult to calculate
an accurate costing.
iii.
A detailed review of commercial property assets
is ongoing.
In response to member’s questions the Executive Councillor
for Customer Services and Resources said the following:
i.
Increasing the commercial property net rental
income has been greatly aided by having a new long term Head of Property in
post.
The committee resolved by 4 votes to 0 to endorse the
recommendations.
The Executive Councillor approved the recommendation.
Conflicts of Interest Declared by the Executive Councillor
(and any Dispensations Granted):
Not applicable.