Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Issue
Matter for
Decision
The City Council,
South Cambridgeshire District Council and Cambridgeshire County Council have a
history of joint working on planning matters, particularly on plan-making. As
part of the duty to cooperate, the three councils have worked collaboratively
and in parallel on new local plans and a transport strategy for the Cambridge
area. This approach will ensure that cross-boundary issues and relevant wider
matters are addressed in a consistent and joined-up manner.
The City Council
published its Local Plan on 19 July 2013. The document is out for consultation
until 30 September 2013. South Cambridgeshire District Council published their Local
Plan on 19 July. Their consultation runs from through to 14 October 2013
In appraising the
South Cambridgeshire Local Plan, the key issue for the City Council is to
ensure that South Cambridgeshire’s policies are aligned with those in the City
Council’s local plan and the overarching development strategy that the councils
have agreed is reflected in the plan.
Additionally,
South Cambridgeshire District Council also issued their Community
Infrastructure Levy Preliminary Draft Charging Schedule. This report includes
the suggested representations to the South Cambridgeshire Local Plan and their
Community Infrastructure Levy Preliminary Draft Charging Schedule for agreement
by Members. Once finalised, these representations will be submitted to South Cambridgeshire
District Council in advance of the two consultation deadlines of 14 October
2013 and 30 September 2013.
Decision of
Executive Councillor for Planning and Climate Change
i.
Agreed the representations to the South
Cambridgeshire Local Plan – Proposed Submission set out in Section 7 of the
report and that these are submitted to South Cambridgeshire District Council as
Cambridge City Council’s formal response to the consultation.
ii.
Agreed the representations to the South
Cambridgeshire Community Infrastructure Levy Preliminary Draft Charging
Schedule set out Section 9 of the Officer’s report and that these are submitted
to South Cambridgeshire District Council as Cambridge City Council’s formal
response to the consultation.
Reason for the Decision
As set out in the Officer’s report.
Any Alternative Options Considered and Rejected
Not applicable.
Scrutiny
Considerations
The Committee received a report from the Principal Planning Officer.
The Committee made the following comments in response to the report:
i.
Supported the
recommendations in principle, subject to clarifications set out below.
ii.
Policy SS/1 Orchard Park: Orchard Park needs a high quality building that
is appropriate for the location. Asked for the term ‘landmark’ to be used
sparingly.
In response to Members’ questions the Head of Planning Services and Principal Planning Officer said the
following:
Policy S/5
Provision of New Jobs and Homes
i.
The South Cambridgeshire District Council (SCDC)
Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment (SHLAA) listed brownfield sites
SCDC had considered.
The Principal Planning Officer undertook to respond
to Councillor Blencowe’s request for clarification on
South Cambridgeshire's development strategy, particularly whether brownfield
sites had been assessed in their SHLAA and subsequently allocated in their
Local Plan.
ii.
Finding suitable sites for development was an issue
for all local authorities.
Policy SS/4 Cambridge Northern Fringe
East and land surrounding the proposed Cambridge Science Park Station
iii.
Undertook to pass on Councillors’ representations
regarding ‘appearance’ to appropriate SCDC Officers.
Proposed Representations on South Cambridgeshire’s Preliminary Draft
Charging Schedule (July 2013)
iv.
The council consulted on its own Preliminary Draft
Charging Schedule in March/April 2013.
Details regarding Cambridge’s own Draft Charging Schedule, the next stage of development of
the Community Infrastructure Levy approach for Cambridge would be taken to 8
October 2013 Environment Scrutiny Committee.
v.
It was noted that a charging schedule could set out
variable rates for the same type of development across a council’s
administrative area. However, for Cambridge, a single mid
range charging rate, not pitched too high for the lower to mid value
charging areas, was considered a more appropriate solution; it better
represents the mix and balance of local circumstances within the relatively
small overall City area, and the blurring between very localised
characteristics and values over short distances.
The Committee resolved by 3 votes to 0 to endorse the recommendations.
The Executive Councillor
approved the recommendations.
Conflicts of Interest Declared by the Executive Councillor (and any
Dispensations Granted)
No conflicts of interest were
declared by the Executive Councillor.