Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Issue
Matter
for Decision:
To approve the undertaking of a feasibility study
and potential physical improvements to the drainage capacity of an area of
16000m2 of Jesus Green, to alleviate problems with seasonal standing surface
water.
Decision of Executive Councillor
for Public Places:
The Executive Councillor resolved to:
Financial
recommendations
i.
The Executive Councillor, in
consultation with the Chair and Spokes is
asked to approve the feasibility study and commencement of this scheme, which
is already included in the Council’s Capital & Revenue Project Plan (PR034C
- 38226).
· The
total cost of the project is £ 105,000 funded from developer contributions
·
The on-going revenue costs of the
project are £ 1,500 per annum over a 30 year period, funded from Streets and
Open Spaces Repairs and Renewals fund.
Procurement
recommendations:
ii.
The Executive Councillor approved the
commencement of the project and procurement, including the award of contract,
of contractors for the drainage improvements for Jesus Green
Subject to:
· The
permission of the Director of Resources being sought prior to proceeding if the
quotation or tender sum exceeds the estimated contract value.
· The
permission from the Executive Councillor being sought before proceeding if the
value exceeds the estimated contract by more than 15%.
Reason for the Decision:
As set out in the Officer’s report.
Any Alternative Options Considered and Rejected:
Not applicable.
Scrutiny Considerations:
The Committee received a report from the Project Delivery and
Environment Manager regarding Jesus Green Drainage Improvements.
Councillor Kightley proposed an
amendment to the financial recommendations as follow (additional wording in
bold and underlined):
·
The Executive Councillor, in consultation with the Chair and
Spokes is asked to approve the feasibility study and commencement of
this scheme, which is already included in the Council’s Capital & Revenue
Project Plan (PR034C - 38226).
Members agreed the amendment.
In response to questions from members, the Officer confirmed
the following:
i.
The
proposed works would not stop flooding but would ensure the ground drained
quicker.
ii.
Arboricultural
Officers would be consulted but no impact on the trees was anticipated.
iii.
There
would be a visual impact on the area for some months. However long term visual
amenity would be unaffected.
iv.
Discussions
were on-going with the Environment Agency.
v.
Members
welcomed the prospect of using the area as a sports facility for longer periods
of the year than currently possible.
The Committee resolved unanimously to endorse the amended
recommendations.
The Executive Councillor approved the recommendation.
Conflicts of interest declared by the Executive Councillor (and any
dispensations granted)
Not applicable.