Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Meeting > Agenda item
1 Introduction (not part of active motion)
The
Green Group proposes the following motion to address resident concerns over the
state of our rivers and chalk stream. We regard the river as an integral part
of the life of our city. Threats to our rivers are threats to us all.
The purpose of
this motion is to:
·
state our city’s aspirations for
our river and chalk streams (“the declaration of the Rights of the River Cam”)
·
petition the organisations
responsible for our river to improve their performance to help save our river
and its tributaries.
·
recognise the limits placed by the
critically depleted state of our river on future growth in buildings and
infrastructure.
·
publicise the immediacy of the
water crisis, creating awareness of the need to reduce water use.
Active Motion
1 Declaration of
the Rights of the River Cam
This Council declares that the
River Cam and its tributaries should have the following rights arising from
their existence in nature:
· The
right to flow and be free from over-abstraction
· The
right to perform essential functions of flooding, moving sediment, recharging
groundwater and sustaining biodiversity
· The
right to be free from pollution
· The
right to feed and be fed by sustainable aquifers
· The
right to native biodiversity
· The
right to restoration
· The
right to maintain connections with other streams and rivers
This Council undertakes to assess
the impact of all its decisions on the health of the river and ensure that all
its decisions support these rights.
This Council calls on
all residents and organisations to act as guardians of the River Cam and engage
with the river in a relationship of respect and stewardship.
2 Responsibility
This Council notes that the
responsible bodies are:
· Environment
Agency – general oversight, including preventing environmental damage to water
and associated biodiversity
· Cambridge
Water – ensuring adequate water supply
· Anglian
Water – management and treatment of sewage
The Council proposes to write to
all three bodies to share its concerns over the state of the river and call
upon them for their assistance.
The Council further notes that
there are other bodies and institutions whose actions have significant impacts
on the health of the river, and particularly highlights the importance of:
·
The University of Cambridge and
its associated colleges, through the maintenance of their assets and the
management of their activities
The Cambridge Development
Corporation –
The Council proposes to write to
the Vice-Chancellor of the University of Cambridge and the Chief Executive and
Chair of the Cambridge Development Corporation to share its concerns over the
state of the river and call upon them for their assistance.
3. Interaction with
the Council’s own actions and the growth of the city
The Council proposes
to set up a small cross-party group to draw up a plan for the actions that it
can specifically undertake to contribute to protection of the river. This will
include:
· considering the impact of future growth in buildings and
infrastructure in the city on the depleted state of our river
· recognising the limits that may be necessary to respect the rights
of the river
· reporting back to full Council preferably prior to updating the
Local Plan.
The group will consult
with the various environmental organisations currently actively involved in
working for the improved health of the river. For the avoidance of doubt, it is
intended that this group will supplement rather than displace the work of existing
scrutiny committees.
The Council proposes
to initiate a publicity campaign to create wide awareness of the current water
crisis and the urgent need to address both the increasing over-abstraction of
water and the decreasing quality of water.
The Council will actively
publicise the Environment Agency’s recommendations to take early action (e.g,
water companies to reduce leakage as a priority, and initiate actions required
under their drought plans), and encourage the public to do all it can to use
water wisely.
End of Active
Motion
Background Notes (not part of active
motion):
1
In late 2025 the Environment
Agency announced
(https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/drought-prospects-for-spring-2026/executive-summary-and-acknowledgements-drought-prospects-for-spring-2026)
that, unless we have average rainfall or more this winter, there will again be
drought this year, with the area including Cambridge highlighted as being
particularly vulnerable.
2
On 22
June 2026, the Environment Agency announced that the Cam and Ely Ouse catchment
has been declared in an area of Prolonged Dry Weather, after East Anglia
received only 37% of the long-term average rainfall over the past three months.
3
On Midsummer’s Day in 2021,
Friends of the River Cam made the first public declaration in the UK of the
rights of the River at Jesus Green, linked to the Universal Declaration of
River Rights: https://www.rightsofrivers.org
4
The declaration is repeated on
Midsummer’s Day each year and is repeated in the text of this motion.
5
The declaration of rights is
supported by many of our local environmental and community groups including
CPRE, FeCRA, Cambridge Friends of the Earth, Save Honey Hill, Keep Waterbeach
Rural, Friends of Logan’s Meadow, Friends of Cherry Hinton and Coldhams Brooks,
and many others.
6
In 2023 Lewes District Council
passed a Rights of Rivers Motion to protect the River Ouse in East Sussex.
Momentum has been growing globally to extend legal rights to nature and in some
cases specifically to rivers.
https://democracy.leweseastbourne.gov.uk/documents/s27490/Motion%20-%20Rights%20of%20the%20River.pdf
6 Councillors Toye-Scott and Nicmanis wish
to thank the Friends of the River Cam and representatives from a number of
local environmental groups for their help in putting this motion together. Any
errors or omissions are of course our own.
Minutes:
The following amended motion was proposed by Councillor Toye-Scott and seconded by Councillor Nicmanis.
The alteration included both the Labour and Liberal Democrat proposed amendments to the original Motion (additional text underlined and deleted text struck through).
1.Declaration
of the Rights of the River Cam
This council
declares that the River Cam and its tributaries should have the following
rights arising from their existence in nature:
This council
undertakes to assess the impact of all its decisions on the health of the
river and ensure that all its decisions support these rights.
This Council
calls on all residents and organisations to act as guardians of the
River Cam and engage with the river in a relationship of respect and
stewardship.
This Council
recognises the River Cam and its tributaries as vital environmental,
ecological, recreational and cultural assets and so will continue to have
regard to the impact of its decisions on the health of the river, consistent
with its statutory duties, powers and responsibilities.
Cambridge
City Council is a significant riverbank landowner and undertakesriverbank
management, biodiversity enhancement, sustainable drainage, flood resilience,
public access management, river infrastructure projects and partnership working
to improve the River Cam.
2 Responsibility
This Council
notes that the responsible bodies are: responsibility for the
health of the River Cam is shared between:
The Council
proposes to write to all three of these bodies to share its concerns over
the state of the river and call upon them for their assistance.
The Council
further notes that there are other bodies and institutions whose actions have
significant impacts on the health of the river, and particularly highlights the
importance of:
· The
University of Cambridge and its associated colleges, through the maintenance of
their assets and the management of their activities
The
Cambridge Development Corporation –
The Council proposes
to write to the Vice-Chancellor of the University of Cambridge and the Chief
Executive and Chair of the Cambridge Development Corporation to share its
concerns over the state of the river and call upon them for their
assistance.
The Council
further notes that the Cambridge Development Corporation – through
its influence over the scale, location and water efficiency of new development,
there are other bodies and institutions whose actions will
have significant impacts on the health of the river, and particularly
highlights the importance of:
· The
University of Cambridge and its associated colleges, through the maintenance of
their assets and the management of their activities
The
Cambridge Development Corporation –
So the Council proposes to write
to the Vice-Chancellor of the University of Cambridge and the
Chief Executive and Chair of the Cambridge Development Corporation to share its
concerns over the state of the river and call upon them for their
assistance.
3. Interaction with the
Council’s own actions and the growth of the city
The Council proposes
to set up a small cross-party group to draw up a plan for the actions that it
can specifically undertake to contribute to protection of the river. This will
include:
· considering
the impact of future growth in buildings and infrastructure in the city on the
depleted state of our river
· recognising
the limits that may be necessary to respect the rights of the river
· reporting
back to full Council preferably prior to updating the Local Plan.
requests an officer report
to be presented to one of the council’s overview and scrutiny committees to
review current Council activity, partnership arrangements, opportunities for
improvement and alignment with the Biodiversity Strategy, Climate Change Strategy,
Urban Forest Strategy and Greater Cambridge Local Plan.
The group Officers will consult
with the various environmental organisations currently actively involved in working
for the improved health of the river. For the avoidance of doubt, it is
intended that this group will supplement rather than displace the work of
existing scrutiny committees.
Council notes the extensive
evidence prepared to support the Greater Cambridge Local Plan on water
scarcity, abstraction reduction and sustainable growth. These matters have been
considered throughout the Local Plan process and will be reported to scrutiny
committee and to Full Council as part of the Submission Local Plan. All
future development should continue to be informed by evidence
demonstrating sustainable water supplies, reduced abstraction, water efficiency
and environmental capacity.
The Council proposes
to initiate a publicity campaign to create wide awareness of the current water
crisis and the urgent need to address both the increasing over-abstraction of
water and the decreasing quality of water. supports continued collaboration
through the Cambridge Water Scarcity Group, Greater Cambridge Chalk Stream
Project, Water Resources East, the Environment Agency, Cambridge Water, Anglian
Water and the Conservators of the River Cam and will work to promote all
communication campaigns regarding water quality and scarcity using the
council’s media channels and press releases.
The Council
will actively publicise the Environment Agency’s recommendations to take early
action (e.g, water companies to reduce leakage as a priority, and initiate actions
required under their drought plans), and encourage the public to do all it can
to use water wisely.
4 What
the River Cam needs
This Council
believes that the aspirations set out in Section 1 must be matched by
action.
4.1
Water in the river
This Council
notes that Cambridge Water introduced a temporary hosepipe ban on 9 July 2026,
enforceable from 17 July - the first in over thirty years; that the Environment
Agency declared the Cam and Ely Ouse catchment to be in prolonged dry weather on
22 June 2026; and that new supply for the Cambridge area is not expected from
the Grafham Water transfer until 2032, or from the Fens Reservoir until the
mid-2030s.
This Council
further notes that the emerging Local Plan phases new development against the
arrival of that infrastructure, but that no equivalent plan exists to improve
water efficiency in the years before it arrives. This Council therefore
resolves to:
4.2
Sewage out of the river
This Council
notes that consent for the relocation of the Cambridge Waste Water Treatment
Plant was granted in April 2025 but the funding for the escalation costs for it
was withdrawn in August 2025, with no funded alternative brought forward by the government since;
and that the emerging Local Plan, and the scrutiny committees of both councils,
identify wastewater treatment capacity as the principal unresolved risk to the
health of the river. No local plan, however carefully prepared, can
build a treatment works with a withdrawn cheque. This Council therefore
resolves to:
4.3
Locks that work
This Council
notes that Baits Bite Lock and Jesus Green Lock were closed in June 2024
because of the risk of structural failure; that Baits Bite has since been
stabilised following a £500,000 grant led by the Mayor of Cambridgeshire and
Peterborough, which met around one third of the cost, with the Conservators
meeting the rest from their own reserves; that Jesus Green Lock remains at risk
and full reconstruction is estimated at over £5 million per lock; and that the
Conservators, funded principally through navigation charges, have stated that
they do not have the money. Comparable navigations elsewhere in England receive
government funding for their infrastructure. The River Cam receives none. This
Council therefore resolves to:
On being put to the vote, it was approved unanimously, and
it was therefore RESOLVED to adopt the following motion:
1
Declaration of the Rights of the River Cam
This council
declares that the River Cam and its tributaries should have the following
rights arising from their existence in nature:
This Council
recognises the River Cam and its tributaries as vital environmental,
ecological, recreational and cultural assets and so will continue to have
regard to the impact of its decisions on the health of the river, consistent
with its statutory duties, powers and responsibilities.
Cambridge
City Council is a significant riverbank landowner and undertakes riverbank management,
biodiversity enhancement, sustainable drainage, flood resilience, public access
management, river infrastructure projects and partnership working to improve
the River Cam.
2 Responsibility
This Council
notes that the responsibility for the health of the River Cam is shared
between:
The Council
proposes to write to all three of these bodies to share its concerns over the
state of the river and call upon them for their assistance.
The Council
further notes that the Cambridge Development Corporation – through its
influence over the scale, location and water efficiency of new development, will
have significant impacts on the health of the river,
So the
Council proposes to write to Chief Executive and Chair of the Cambridge
Development Corporation to share its concerns over the state of the river and
call upon them for their assistance.
3. Interaction with the
Council’s own actions and the growth of the city
The Council requests
an officer report to be presented to one of the council’s overview and scrutiny
committees to review current Council activity, partnership arrangements,
opportunities for improvement and alignment with the Biodiversity Strategy,
Climate Change Strategy, Urban Forest Strategy and Greater Cambridge Local
Plan.
Officers will
consult with the various environmental organisations currently actively
involved in working for the improved health of the river.
Council notes the extensive evidence prepared to
support the Greater Cambridge Local Plan on water scarcity, abstraction
reduction and sustainable growth. These matters have been considered throughout
the Local Plan process and will be reported to scrutiny committee and to Full
Council as part of the Submission Local Plan. All future development should
continue to be informed by evidence demonstrating sustainable water supplies,
reduced abstraction, water efficiency and environmental capacity.
The Council
supports continued collaboration through the Cambridge Water Scarcity Group,
Greater Cambridge Chalk Stream Project, Water Resources East, the Environment
Agency, Cambridge Water, Anglian Water and the Conservators of the River Cam
and will work to promote all communication campaigns regarding water quality
and scarcity using the council’s media channels and press releases.
The Council
will actively publicise the Environment Agency’s recommendations to take early
action (e.g, water companies to reduce leakage as a priority, and initiate
actions required under their drought plans), and encourage the public to do all
it can to use water wisely.
4
What the River Cam needs
This Council
believes that the aspirations set out in Section 1 must be matched by
action.
4.1
Water in the river
This Council
notes that Cambridge Water introduced a temporary hosepipe ban on 9 July 2026,
enforceable from 17 July - the first in over thirty years; that the Environment
Agency declared the Cam and Ely Ouse catchment to be in prolonged dry weather
on 22 June 2026; and that new supply for the Cambridge area is not expected
from the Grafham Water transfer until 2032, or from the Fens Reservoir until
the mid-2030s.
This Council
further notes that the emerging Local Plan phases new development against the
arrival of that infrastructure, but that no equivalent plan exists to improve
water efficiency in the years before it arrives. This Council therefore
resolves to:
4.2
Sewage out of the river
This Council
notes that consent for the relocation of the Cambridge Waste Water Treatment
Plant was granted in April 2025 but the funding for the escalation costs for it
was withdrawn in August 2025, with no funded alternative brought forward since;
and that the emerging Local Plan, and the scrutiny committees of both councils,
identify wastewater treatment capacity as the principal unresolved risk to the
health of the river. This Council therefore resolves to:
4.3
Locks that work
This Council
notes that Baits Bite Lock and Jesus Green Lock were closed in June 2024
because of the risk of structural failure; that Baits Bite has since been
stabilised following a £500,000 grant led by the Mayor of Cambridgeshire and
Peterborough, which met around one third of the cost, with the Conservators
meeting the rest from their own reserves; that Jesus Green Lock remains at risk
and full reconstruction is estimated at over £5 million per lock; and that the
Conservators, funded principally through navigation charges, have stated that they
do not have the money. Comparable navigations elsewhere in England receive
government funding for their infrastructure. The River Cam receives none. This
Council therefore resolves to: